I don’t think a meta service is a better alternativejust get a damn iphone or use whatsapp etc.
I don’t think a meta service is a better alternativejust get a damn iphone or use whatsapp etc.
so basically, you are mad that Apple is pulling a “Google Chrome”.Really fun when it’s a hot take to want apple to fully support encryption for all messages and better quality photos and images. I don’t care about the protocol, and yes the involvement with google is questionable. They’re correct to not give data to google like that. I just really don’t like them using their market position to prevent any kind of unified progress outside the iMessage world.
If you really think it is't you've never exchanged media with a non-Apple person. It's better, more secure for both sides and no open-minded person who isn't an Apple martyr could think otherwise.lol RCS is ****ing stupid.
if you *really* think RCS is a good idea, you have no idea what you're talking about.
I don’t think a meta service is a better alternative
What politics? Is Apple dead naming Google and not using their pronouns?It's political reasons if you did not already notice that.
Should make Apple users mad too. Your experience is downgraded sending (and receiving) things outside the garden. Less secure too.I just enjoy how mad it makes people who buy an Android.
It’s like people who buy a massive SUV and then complain about gas prices. You knew what you were signing up for and now are mad that this obvious consequence to your actions exists?
I find it very ironic that google is the bad guy of the thread, but meta is a perfectly viable option. Am I missing something here?Funny... the USA is the problem? In the USA, the 2 most popular messaging apps are... WhatsApp in the #1 position... and FB Messenger in the #2 position. Hell, we have enough Chinese ex-pats here that WeChat makes the list.
This is a problem that's long been solved. The problem is in a vocal minority.
Apple has been increasing their encrypted traffic year after year. Almost every hole that was pointed out two years ago when this RCS made yet another round here on MR has now been moved to E2E.Just because I want a better standard than RCS doesn’t mean I support or trust google. I absolutely don’t want my messages to go through google’s servers. It didn’t have to be this way. I’d bet if apple had been involved from the beginning, SMS would be dead and carriers would operate the servers. It’s the refusal to participate in a conversation around improved messaging and potentially encryption for everyone that has me questioning their motives. Google isn’t better, not saying that at all, but it gives me pause around apple’s privacy marketing.
I find it very ironic that google is the bad guy of the thread, but meta is a perfectly viable option. Am I missing something here?
Meta is every bit as awful as Google, but I have no say in what other people use. I have no social media whatsoever (aside from a couple forum memberships), but the facts are clear that “the market” has spoken for alternatives to SMS 🤷♂️I find it very ironic that google is the bad guy of the thread, but meta is a perfectly viable option. Am I missing something here?
No, because my contacts are smart and use third party apps.Should make Apple users mad too. Your experience is downgraded sending (and receiving) things outside the garden. Less secure too.
No one's mad. Both sides could enjoy a more high quality multimedia experience.
But let's go with this (as usual) false equivalent car analogy.
Not if you ever sent any media to anyone outside your iPhone strata.one can be for iMessage on android and against rcs
rcs is not better.
It's a hassle and another hoop to jump through while not being as seamless but if they are happy doing it good for them. I never will. I prefer less friction and 3rd party apps are just that. iMessage and Google messages are great as is. Except for Apple caring more about their bottom line than user-experience.No, because my contacts are smart and use third party apps.
I guess? I mean it’s also ridiculous that chrome and all browsers on iOS are just safari with some paint. I don’t like chrome but on almost every platform I have the choice to use it or not. I choose not to! I’d love the choice to use RCS and actual Firefox on my iPhone but I guess that’s sacrilegious to even think about 🤯so basically, you are mad that Apple is pulling a “Google Chrome”.
What stigma? Are you saying Apple is stigmatizing some people? I am not really sure Android users care about this that much (or at all). They may not even know about this Apple phenomena. It's all in Apple fan heads: fake superiority complex (as if blue bubbles were better than green bubbles).The Green Bubble stigma must really be hurting Samsung.
Did you misread the part where that poster you quoted said you can be FOR iMessage on Android?Not if you ever sent any media to anyone outside your iPhone strata.
It's better and more secure. It's an unassailable fact. Unless you so pro-Apple you cut your nose off to spite your face.
I too would like Firefox to be able to use its own engine. Unfortunately I don’t trust browsers on mobile to be anything but poorly coded security targets as everyone and their mother rushes to reskin chromium when that door opens up.I guess? I mean it’s also ridiculous that chrome and all browsers on iOS are just safari with some paint. I don’t like chrome but on almost every platform I have the choice to use it or not. I don’t! I’d love the choice to use RCS and actual Firefox on my iPhone but I guess that’s sacrilegious to even think about 🤯
Blue Bubbles. It's what makes iPhone iPhone.I don't really care what other people use, but if they care so much, they can switch to iPhone.
Unfortunately as demonstrated by this thread, there is NO secure standard to fall back to. That’s not laziness by Apple, that’s just the reality of the telecom industry. The telecoms are responsible for delivery, they use SMS. THERE IS NO FINANCIAL INCENTIVE FOR THEM TO CHANGE THAT, so it won’t happen.Honestly outside of news stories here I have never heard anybody complain about bubble color. Ever. And I know many Android and iPhone users that text just fine.
That said the fact iMessage calls back on an un-encrypted option is a failure by Apple. Either use existing options or develop one. Doing nothing is just stupid and lazy.
Google does nothing but kill things it creates. No one in their right mind is going to trust Google to keep RCS some kind of standard. There’s tons of webpages dedicated to every project Google killed.It's so shocking how people here are genuinely opposed to better interactions between iPhones and Androids. I don't understand that. SMS is terribly limited and outdated, and not E2E encrypted. And it's not like Androids are going away, so why keep the experience this bad on iMessages?
Not that I think this ad campaign will have any effect on Apple at all, but that doesn't mean that Apple should do nothing on improving communication standards on iPhone
Totally agree on the one browser engine thing. I use safari on all my apple devices and Firefox on my pc. I have to use a chromium-based browser for work so I use arc. I think other browsers could pretty easily work on iOS without too many security concerns, esp since third party apps are already sandboxed. I do hate that if that happened, more people would be using chromium, increasing the market dominance. From that perspective I can understand why apple does it.I too would like Firefox to be able to use its own engine. Unfortunately I don’t trust browsers on mobile to be anything but poorly coded security targets as everyone and their mother rushes to reskin chromium when that door opens up.
I like Firefox and Safari in general because they offer the only real two browser engine alternatives to Chromium which is taking over everything (edge is now chromium based). Given Google controls chromium (look what they just did with their 3rd party cookie “alternative” that gives away data by default!) I think it’s dangerous for the world to solidify on one browser engine…