Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think all of this is an effort to punish Apple. They have done this with other American companies. Look what they have done to the motorcycle company Harley Davidson. 56% duty on the bike, basically totally pricing it out of the market. Maybe the US should do the same type of thing to BMW and Mercedes.

Paranoia by proxy? Why do you care if the EU were actually out to "punish" Apple? Which they’re not.

And wasn’t the Harley Davidson situation a response to punitive duties for European products, implemented by the previous US administration?
 
Didn't the EU several years back try to get Apple to switch to that crapy connector that Android phones use? I think all of this is an effort to punish Apple. They have done this with other American companies. Look what they have done to the motorcycle company Harley Davidson. 56% duty on the bike, basically totally pricing it out of the market. Maybe the US should do the same type of thing to BMW and Mercedes.

Why not let the market take care of it's self. If the Europeans don't like the connector on the iPhone, don't buy it.

That tariff didn’t go ahead and was in response to US tariffs on imported steel and aluminium. Guess what EU steel and aluminium was priced out of the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RolandGo
The eSIM only models just removed the SIM tray, rather than replacing it with a whole new part.

Sure, but it still means a whole different case part, which no doubt adds to costs at least slightly.

But you’re right about not keeping Lightning. They didn’t keep lightning on iPads in any market, why would they do so on iPhones?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DreamsOfGrandeur
NB: on the original iMac the USB was mainly replacing ports such as the ADB bus (Apple proprietary), Localtalk (Apple Proprietary) and RS 423 serial (needed a special cable to convert to RS232) so it really was a clear step forward...

No different from Lightning which is just another Apple proprietary nonsense. Arguably, they’re still up to it even today with MagSafe on Macs.
 
It’s 10Gbps on the iPad Air at least, I’ve not checked the others. But economies of scale would suggest they’ll make them all the same.

The iPad Pro with M2 gets the full Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 40 Gbps. It’s determined by what SoC the device uses as the port capabilities are built in to the chip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fat jez
Well at long last.. Turns out iPhone 14 Series is the worst iPhone to buy?

May be the last iPhone with Lightning port, a possibly scraped down Dynamic Island, and possibly all-48MP camera sensors for upcoming iPhones.
 
The iPad Pro with M2 gets the full Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 40 Gbps. It’s determined by what SoC the device uses as the port capabilities are built in to the chip.
Thank you, didn’t know it was built in, I presumed it would be a separate controller.

Just looking at the 2022 iPad, there’s no mention of what speed it supports, although you can connect an external display at up to 4K@30Hz.
 
Thank you, didn’t know it was built in, I presumed it would be a separate controller.

Just looking at the 2022 iPad, there’s no mention of what speed it supports, although you can connect an external display at up to 4K@30Hz.
USB 2.0 speed
 
  • Like
Reactions: fat jez
No different from Lightning which is just another Apple proprietary nonsense. Arguably, they’re still up to it even today with MagSafe on Macs.
Lightning made good sense in its time - much better mechanically and far more versatile than mini/microUSB - but should have been replaced with USB-C in 2016 when (a) apparently USB-C was all you needed on a MacBook and (b) they removed the headphone jack from the iPhone, so people needed new headphones anyway.

LocalTalk & ADB, offered unique features not offered by “industry standard” interfaces when they first appeared (there was no USB, and Ethernet was expensive) - but they were ready to be replaced when the first iMac came out.

As for MagSafe, the current MacBook Pro version is completely optional - the charger has a USB-C output and the MacBook Pro can be charged by it's USB-C ports. It’s also an example of when a dedicated connector can be useful on a computer with space for multiple ports - it does one job well - an easy to pull-out breakaway connector solves a particular problem - trailing laptop power cables pulling computers off desks - and avoids wasting a whole Thunderbolt port & controller just to power your laptop - but it is too easily disconnected to use for connecting disc drives etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reason077
So how could those Android phones get a USB-C connector if a micro-USB connector was required?
The MicroUSB agreement expired years ago (& also allowed the use of a dongle) and they've taken this long to produce a new directive.

So why is the EU doing this? To make peoples life better? So say I bought a new iPhone with a USB-C connector. I already have a bunch of lighting cables, and use them on my AirPods charging case, iPad, Apple Pencil, and an adapter for 1/8 headphone, Apple magic mouse.
Everybody is spinning this as EU vs. Apple, when Apple isn't really the big offender. Their iDevices have always used chargers with USB sockets so its only cables that get "wasted" (I've been travelling with a single adapter and a mix of Apple and Android devices for years) and they've only gone through 3 connectors (Firewire, 30 pin, Lightning) in the entire history of iDevices.

People seem to have forgotten the bad old days of the 90s/00s when every brand of phone, media player, digital camera - sometimes even different models from the same brand - came with its own idiosyncratic power & data sockets and (usually) a charging brick with a captive cable. These days, one USB-A adapter and 3 cables (lightning, microUSB, USB-C) and you're usually sorted.

Whether the EU had any influence on this - or whether USB was going to emerge as the de-facto standard low voltage power/data interface anybody is harder to say, but at worst the EU directive is irrelevant and just pushing on an open door.

However, the reason for such directives is "the tragedy of the commons" - the majority of consumers don't look at the big picture and if one manufacturer can gain a competitive edge with the old "cut the sticker price and make up by selling expensive proprietary chargers" they'll all fall for it, and soon other companies will be forced down the same road by competitive pressures. The more discerning consumer won't have any choice. When done properly, these sorts of rules level the playing field for manufacturers who want to do the right thing and can actually improve competition.

If you're choosing (say) a phone, you want to make your decision on things like the merits of iOS vs. Android or the relative quality of the cameras - not whether you'll have to replace all of your accessories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: madeirabhoy
When Danny’s friends asked him why he finally started using skin moisturizer, he claimed it was because his Mom made him.
 
Apple could have avoided the EU debacle if they just did the right thing years ago. They manufactured this problem.
oh did they ... hmm let me see how many times the 80% of the Producst have changes the connector sice apple changed it from 40pin to lightning ... lets count, MiniUSB, MicroUSB, then some PropriateUSB and now last 3to4 years USB-C which still is not the same as the first one.

So what the hell are you talking here, you dont even know what you have written not that apple should have done something.

If you believ that you will change the USB-C iPhone with a standard USB-C cable from china ... LOLOLOLOLOLOL ... the be prepared for a surpise. YOU WONT :-D
 
There won’t be a replacement for USB-C. It’ll be USB-C and then wireless protocols. There is no need for a new standard connector as USB-C (assuming 3.0 speeds or higher) has enough data and energy bandwidth that will be sufficient for 99% of users and devices for the next 30 years.

If a better connector comes along, do you think that Apple would be in a rush to adopt it given they’ve stuck with Lightning for so long?
Yes there was such information long time ago ... 256KB should be enough for everyone ... :-D
 
There won’t be a replacement for USB-C. It’ll be USB-C and then wireless protocols. There is no need for a new standard connector as USB-C (assuming 3.0 speeds or higher) has enough data and energy bandwidth that will be sufficient for 99% of users and devices for the next 30 years.

If a better connector comes along, do you think that Apple would be in a rush to adopt it given they’ve stuck with Lightning for so long?
after 30 years you wont even know what USB-C is nor you could connect something with or to it.
 
For all of you complaining about the prospect of a better connector that may come in the future...
Guys the legislation is not set in stone. It can adapt if something better comes along!

At the moment usb-c is the best we have.
And just how this will be done ? on which product this can / could be, before the "LEGISLATION" will be adapted ? are really thinking what you have just written ... because this is impossible to do.

And just on behalve of what the EU said that the USB-C is better that Lightning ? ... on nothing and no one, the "Standard" is and was never a theme for politicians but for the manufacturers and the cunsumers what they want preferr and how convient is it to use.
 
oh did they ... hmm let me see how many times the 80% of the Producst have changes the connector sice apple changed it from 40pin to lightning ... lets count, MiniUSB, MicroUSB, then some PropriateUSB and now last 3to4 years USB-C which still is not the same as the first one.

So what the hell are you talking here, you dont even know what you have written not that apple should have done something.

If you believ that you will change the USB-C iPhone with a standard USB-C cable from china ... LOLOLOLOLOLOL ... the be prepared for a surpise. YOU WONT :-D
My guy… Are you drunk?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.