Finally we have a date to look forward to. Hopefully it is the correct day. I’m always super excited for Apple’s events. The production value is always top notch.
The long delayed 27" iMac successor is what next for a Mac release, but they are now saying that is delayed from the original April time frame. Of course that could just mean everything happens including LG displays in May.SE 3 and new iPad Air are boring updates. Mac Mini Pro will be the star of the show. Would also be an ideal time to unveil some Apple displays.
The M series of chips is referred to as a "System on a Chip", or SOC for short. If the "system" is an upgrade, why do you care about a speed gain? It sounds like you haven't gotten off of the Intel "MHz/GHz train", and that's a train that left the station what, 15 years ago?The most intersting takeaway when they eventually release the M2 will be the actual speed gain over M1. If it is not substantial, I’ll start to worry.
3. Replacement base level MacBook Pro with M2, no touchbar with old model discontinued. Immediately released.
4. M2 MacBook Air with old model discontinued. Immediately released.
None of the iMacs have been a WWDC announcement. If not in May, they could do a July/Aug announcement?I also doubt they would announce an iMac(Pro) to be released later, I'd rather expect those to be a WWDC "one more thing".
June 2017 was wwdc.None of the iMacs have been a WWDC announcement. If not in May, they could do a July/Aug announcement?
![]()
Now THIS will not happen. For sure.I have a sneaking suspicion the Mac Pro will stay intel for a few more years.
Your right. That WWDC was unusual they used it to annnounced a iMac, MacBook, MBA, and MBP.June 2017 was wwdc.
I’m betting will see:
1. 27” M1 pro/max iMac. Available in 2 months.
2. M1 pro/max Mac mini (which will overlap the current Mac Pro market). Immediately released.
3. Replacement base level MacBook Pro with M2, no touchbar with old model discontinued. Immediately released.
4. M2 MacBook Air with old model discontinued. Immediately released.
I’m interested in (1). Big time. If that doesn’t materialise then (2).
Given how late we already are in A15-gen AS I'd expect anything M2 to be released after the next iPhone (with the M2 sharing IP with the A16).
It would also look odd releasing budget/consumer HW on a new gen at the same time (or even before) high end stuff still on last gen.
I also doubt they would announce an iMac(Pro) to be released later, I'd rather expect those to be a WWDC "one more thing".
None of the iMacs have been a WWDC announcement. If not in May, they could do a July/Aug announcement?
![]()
June 2017 was wwdc.
lol no. They will not release any M2 devices until late summer
You never know. Remember this time when Apple announce the MacBook Pro with a Retina display. This was all during WWDC. This was the big thing. It honestly seems like yesterday 😔😔Your right. That WWDC was unusual they used it to annnounced a iMac, MacBook, MBA, and MBP.
We certainly are not helping the perspective that March 8 will offer much.You never know. Remember this time when Apple announce the MacBook Pro with a Retina display. This was the big thing. It honestly seems like yesterday 😔😔
i think it will. i think the BIG mac pro will forever be intel because apple silicon cannot support that form factor as far as we know. those pcie slots will be useless. i think the plan is that they make a smaller mac pro or bigger mac mini that supports the strongest apple chip, and leave the desktop computer case sized mac pro for intel. there were rumors that they was gonna update the intel chip.Now THIS will not happen. For sure.
Exactly what are you getting at here?The M series of chips is referred to as a "System on a Chip", or SOC for short. If the "system" is an upgrade, why do you care about a speed gain? It sounds like you haven't gotten off of the Intel "MHz/GHz train", and that's a train that left the station what, 15 years ago?
You should reconsider whether or not you're putting too much emphasis on speed ratings in your thinking and/or purchase decisions.
i think it will. i think the BIG mac pro will forever be intel because apple silicon cannot support that form factor as far as we know. those pcie slots will be useless. i think the plan is that they make a smaller mac pro or bigger mac mini that supports the strongest apple chip, and leave the desktop computer case sized mac pro for intel. there were rumors that they was gonna update the intel chip.
The PPC architecture and ISA wasn’t massively scalable at the time. That’s why it died. ARM is a little different as it’s just an ISA and the implementation is vendor specific. Apple have total design control here.Exactly what are you getting at here?
I could not care less what clock speed any cpu (or SoC for that matter) has, heck I don’t even know what clock speed the M1 has.
The interesting thing is what speed (as in computational speed, not raw Hzs) gains Apple can squeeze out for every ”generation” of the M-series.
If the speed gains of a new generation is not substantial, that does not bode well for the future of the M-series. The M1 is amazing, but can they keep it going? It’s not like Intel and AMD is sitting on their asses doing nothing. Sure the M1 is great, but I would hate for the M-series to not develop in a timely manner and we lost x86 compatibility for 1-2 gens of better tech, and then relive the whole PPC debacle again.
When the G3s came out, they toasted the Intel stuff, and even the G4 and G5 matched or surpassed anything Intel brought to the market. Then it all went downhill from there, quickly.
There is little to speculate on with a high confidence factor. There was discussion of a discrete GPU, then we have the much larger SoC M1 Max with 32 GPU cores. Apple can certainly create a expandable architecture away from a single SoC. It's believed the next Mac Pro could have 2 or 4 or more Max 1 SoC's on boards. They could certainly engineer high speed data storage that is upgradable, not limited to soldered on like with the SoCs. They could certainly make it either in workstation form or server form. Silicon Graphics had examples of massive RISC based processors arrays that could achieve processing feats that were far from the usual workstation back then. Why does the comparisons to what is announced so far predict how far Apple could go in the same direction towards super computing using ARM?i think it will. i think the BIG mac pro will forever be intel because apple silicon cannot support that form factor as far as we know. those pcie slots will be useless. i think the plan is that they make a smaller mac pro or bigger mac mini that supports the strongest apple chip, and leave the desktop computer case sized mac pro for intel. there were rumors that they was gonna update the intel chip.
Agreed. What Apple should do is keep the MacBook Air M1 in the line-up as their entry-level MacBook offering, reducing the price to $899. The new MacBook design will slot in above at $1,099 or $1,199. It will have the M2 chip as well as all of the other rumored changes.
In addition, Apple should (not saying they will - but they SHOULD) bring on a 15" MacBook. This new family would eclipse the necessity for that 13" MacBook Pro configuration.
This would seriously quell our Apple product line-up OCD proclivities...
MacBook Air 13"
MacBook 13" & 15"
MacBook Pro 14" & 16"
Simple. Done.
Goodbye Touch BarGoodbye Touch Bar
It’s been nice
Hope you find your paradise
I kept “nice” because “pointless” doesn’t fit and “dumb” doesn’t rhyme.
We certainly are not helping the perspective that March 8 will offer much.![]()