Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
not if they wanted people to actually make the transition. I believe there would have been a lot of resistance. Hi, here is the new Mac. If your favorite apps arent in the App Store, you won't be using them anymore.

I am guessing you do not use Hazel or Little Snitch because you don't seem to grasp what they can do..

Actually, I have been using both for years and I am aware of how powerful they are. I don’t see them going away anytime soon. In fact, Hazel 5 has native M1 support.

Your comment confirms a common case on this forum: if someone disagrees with you, they must not know what they are talking about, they are not “pro users”, etc. Though, I don’t expect anyone using the term “sheep” unironically to respect the opinions of others.

Anyway, Apple has a very clear path for the Mac and nothing they did with the platform in recent years suggests they will stop apps like this from working.


sorry I hurt your feelings but it is accurate when it concerns locking down a computer like a phone. we already have s "computer" with diapers, its called an iPad.

iPad is, of course, not as complex or open as a Mac, but it is an awesome companion device that offers a lot for certain workflows. Calling such a great device “a computer with diapers” seems childish. Not every device is good for everything, and iPad is not a Mac and it’s not supposed to be. This is why you shouldn’t worry about the fate of certain Mac apps by looking at the iPad - these are different platforms intended for different things, with some things overlapping.
 
Last edited:
They are probably saving it for the "pro" models. They need differentiating features to justify the "pro" moniker and price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
Apples Face ID is more secure than Microsoft’s Face ID. Apples Face ID is 3D, whereas Microsoft’s Face ID is 2d. I can get a picture of myself and it will unlock on the pc.
Thank you and several before you… a bit tired of those comparisons.
To exaggerate, it feels a bit like: “Yeah, well, Henry Ford already had ‘cars’ with wheels and a steering wheels decades ago… these Teslas are just too late in the game”, or “well, Intel already had Pentium 4 at 4.2GHz… these M1s are nothing new”. Or “my snapdragon Samsung has 12 cores and 8GB of Ram while yours has 4 cores and 2GB of RAM, higher effective benchmarks on iOS doesn’t count”.

Same with the 1080p cameras from 6 years ago and today’s Apple’s 720p. Heck even today’s comparisons on the Max Tech YT channel between competing M1 Air like laptops: their supposed higher tier 1080p cams and microphones pale in comparison to Apple’s outcome.
 
I'm feel like Gurman is more predicting than actually giving new information in these newsletters.

Exactly.

I like rumors when they are based on something tangible... leaks from manufacturing, info found inside beta software, etc.

But a lot of these stories are just plain guessing, "Apple could do this, sometime, maybe..."

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
I would love FaceID. I hate TouchID. I was always having it fail and to retrain. I suffer from very dry hands and eczema. All my id woes went when Face ID came along.
Getting new iMac soon and concerned if Touch ID stresses return. I just hope unlock with watch stays!
Can’t understand why iMac cannot do it given my iPad Pro and iPhone pro max both manage it in small form factor displays. Can’t they just put the iPhone or iPad camera in an iMac?
 
Don’t understand why this is taking Apple so long. The Mac is arguably the strongest use case for FaceID.
Because iPhones/IPads are better selling items than iMacs/MacBooks/Air’s are.

And getting new processors into their Laptop/Desktop line is a higher priority than FaceID is right now. Yes they could probably do both, but introducing multiple physical features seems to be limited to IOS products.
 
I don’t believe it. They’ll stick with TouchID as it provides a more secure interaction. With TouchID, you have to intentionally and physically interact with the machine which is a single interaction. If they did FaceID, you’d have to present your face and interact physically with the machine (ie double press a button like with your iPhone or iPad) which is more complex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r
That's like calling a socket wrench an s "tool" with diapers because it's not an adjustable wrench. Different tools for different uses.
I will clean it up for you.

If you had a socket wrench and apple decided the only socket sizes you could use are the ones they choose for you, yes you are correct, that would be an S tool.
 
Last edited:
the fact that you think this is about the chips calls into doubt everything you are saying..

Again you go with the assumptions. No, it’s not about the chips or hardware capabilities, it’s about business decisions. This was an example to show you that “life goes on”. The developer clearly believes in the sustainability of their business, we just got a new version that works great on new Macs, and things are the same as they always have been - even with the biggest change for the Mac since the Intel transition, at the height of Apple’s power, capability and, in some ways even hubris. If things change down the line, there are no signs of that happening at the moment and you even have Apple publicly saying they have no intention of changing how things work in this regard.

The fact is, and I keep repeating this, Apple hasn’t done anything to indicate things will change on the Mac, unless you have some preset narrative that you want to push, while dismissing other people as sheep.

Also, how you sidetracked the conversation to this gloom & doom scenario just based on the rumor Macs are getting Face ID is beyond me. Macs will be fine.
 
Again you go with the assumptions. No, it’s not about the chips or hardware capabilities, it’s about business decisions. This was an example to show you that “life goes on”. The developer clearly believes in the sustainability of their business, we just got a new version that works great on new Macs, and things are the same as they always have been - even with the biggest change for the Mac since the Intel transition, at the height of Apple’s power, capability and, in some ways even hubris. If things change down the line, there are no signs of that happening at the moment and you even have Apple publicly saying they have no intention of changing how things work in this regard.

The fact is, and I keep repeating this, Apple hasn’t done anything to indicate things will change on the Mac, unless you have some preset narrative that you want to push, while dismissing other people as sheep.

Also, how you sidetracked the conversation to this gloom & doom scenario just based on the rumor Macs are getting Face ID is beyond me. Macs will be fine.
As stated many times by senior Apple execs, publicly.

At this point, what does it matter what some internet anon says?
 
Folks, you heard it from me first:
- new Mac will keep coming in the next couple of years
- they will have thinner bazels and newer screen tech
- As they will be launched, they will be the best Mac to date
That would’ve been bad forecasting if you did this several years ago. The 2016-2018 MacBook Pro are some of the worst Macs Apple has ever made with terrible keyboards and display backlight issues.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.