Sure and the only difference between a 2015 MBAir and the M1 Air is that the base M1 comes with double the RAM.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Sure and the only difference between a 2015 MBAir and the M1 Air is that the base M1 comes with double the RAM.
Facebook ofcSo what are you all using an iPad Pro for? Curious.
Both the iPad Pro and MacBook Air (the Air's CPU upgrade is more significant) have received faster chips, more RAM, faster networking, Thunderbolt USB-C, better speakers, and a more advanced OS (the 2018 iPP only gets 30% of Stage Manager's functionality). Underutilizing your iPad doesn't change that fact, but on the plus side you don't have to upgrade now.I have no idea what you're talking about.
Both the iPad Pro and MacBook Air (the Air's CPU upgrade is more significant) have received faster chips, more RAM, faster networking, Thunderbolt USB-C, better speakers, and a more advanced OS (the 2018 iPP only gets 30% of Stage Manager's functionality). Underutilizing your iPad doesn't change that fact, but on the plus side you don't have to upgrade now.
If you really believed that double the RAM was the only upgrade since 2018 then why did you buy an M1 iPad which you said was disappointing? You could have purchased a 2020 and pocketed the savings.I don't have a 2018 iPad - I have the M1 iPad.
If you really believed that double the RAM was the only upgrade since 2018 then why did you buy an M1 iPad?
If you really believed that double the RAM was the only upgrade since 2018 then why did you buy an M1 iPad which you said was disappointing? You could have purchased a 2020 and pocketed the savings.
Nope, not me. iPad had potential but Apple has done nothing with the product in 10 years. They purposely make it crap so it doesn't become good enough to replace your Mac and/or iPhone. Any product that is designed to not be good will never be good. Apple purposely design the iPad as a companion device to your Mac/phone. It's the reason why iPadOS is so heavily gimped by Apple's restrictions on what they allow iPadOS to do for the user - which isn't much.We all know everyone you ready to buy this is just gonna use it to browse Macrumors and watch YouTube. Admit it! 😄
Those people can save money by not upgrading.The upgrades from the 2018 are not that meaningful to most people. Don't pretend the use cases that actually utilise the upgrade from the 2018 to the M1 actually apply to most people.
We're discussing the M2 iPads which will launch with iPadOS16 and Stage Manager. Lots of people bought the 14" and 16" MBPs at launch despite most 3rd party apps running under Rosetta instead of being ARM-native.We don't even have an OS that uses virtual memory or allows apps to use virtual memory yet. Once we have that, it'll take a decent amount of time for the apps to start coming out and utilising that.
Think of all the money you could have saved buying a refurb 2020 iPP since I'm assuming you don't utilize the M1's improvements. If you do utilize the M1 iPad, it seems contradictory to phrase it as a disappointing improvement over the 2018 iPP.As for why I got the M1 iPad, I never had a 2018.
No, I'm saying if double the RAM is the only advancement in 5.5 years, it's disappointing.
A discussion is not a fight.I never said the M1 was disappointing. Boy you are in a fighting mood today.
Those people can save money by not upgrading.
We're discussing the M2 iPads which will launch with iPadOS16 and Stage Manager. Lots of people bought the 14" and 16" MBPs at launch despite most 3rd party apps running under Rosetta instead of being ARM-native.
Think of all the money you could have saved buying a refurb 2020 iPP since I'm assuming you don't utilize the M1's improvements. If you do utilize the M1 iPad, it seems contradictory to phrase it as a disappointing improvement over the 2018 iPP.
Not really, as there is no chip and pin support without an outside device of course.
Nope. They won’t do the batteries on 2017 or 2018 iPad pros.
Apple’s currently selling around 40-50 million iPads a year. That’s currently enough for them to make a profit and keep investing in and iterating on the device. That means, outside of those folks, there could be billions that find the iPad features a dealbreaker and won’t buy one and they’ll still sell their 40-50 million.While I agree 11” or even 12.9” is not enough for true productivity, the limitation Of iOS will forever put iPadOS into an awkward spot: can do macOS things a little bit here and there but not quite. And those “not quite“ moments are going to be dealbreaker for many people, forcing them to either stop using iPad for their work or buy a Mac/PC as “supplementary” or main device.
Most is not all. Also, there are purchase amount limits to contactless. That's why all of the third party POS card readers include chip-and-pin support.Most cards these days are contactless. Certainly all mine are.
But the original design of the iPad is what makes it so good though. I don't want to use my laptop (a Mac) in bed or for most leisure activities. What happened was when Microsoft got the formula for the Surface Pro right it became a threat not only to the Mac, but also the iPad. But, I've had a Surface Pro 3 since 2015 and I've never had a desire to use it the way I like using my iPad. The productivity benefits of the Mac that a lot of iPad users are yearning for is maybe too much to ask from an OS that is derived from a phone OS.Nope, not me. iPad had potential but Apple has done nothing with the product in 10 years. They purposely make it crap so it doesn't become good enough to replace your Mac and/or iPhone. Any product that is designed to not be good will never be good. Apple purposely design the iPad as a companion device to your Mac/phone. It's the reason why iPadOS is so heavily gimped by Apple's restrictions on what they allow iPadOS to do for the user - which isn't much.
Yes, yes, yes, for some people it's good enough as their primary device but for the vast majority it isn't. And that's by design. Apple's design.
When the M1 iPad Pro was announced I genuinely thought the upcoming iPadOS that year would finally be feature rich and they'd be power apps like Final Cut etc available to take advantage of the ridiculous power of the M1.
How wrong and disappointed was I/we all? Same old tired useless crap, year after year.
All that wasted potential. It's so frustrating.
This is truly absurd. The iPad was never meant to replace a desktop or laptop or phone. And why should it? If you need a desktop, laptop or phone then you buy a desktop, laptop or phone.iPad had potential but Apple has done nothing with the product in 10 years. They purposely make it crap so it doesn't become good enough to replace your Mac and/or iPhone.
You're right. Those users can keep happily using their iPads.It's a well discussed point at this stage that the upgrades since the 2018 have had a relatively minor impact on the user experience for the majority of users.
This is what Tim Cook himself said:This is truly absurd. The iPad was never meant to replace a desktop or laptop or phone. And why should it? If you need a desktop, laptop or phone then you buy a desktop, laptop or phone.
Yeah, all the issues with iPad are software ones. The hardware is flawless & it always has been.But the original design of the iPad is what makes it so good though. I don't want to use my laptop (a Mac) in bed or for most leisure activities. What happened was when Microsoft got the formula for the Surface Pro right it became a threat not only to the Mac, but also the iPad. But, I've had a Surface Pro 3 since 2015 and I've never had a desire to use it the way I like using my iPad. The productivity benefits of the Mac that a lot of iPad users are yearning for is maybe too much to ask from an OS that is derived from a phone OS.
Maybe what Apple needs to do, just like how they took a lot of the plumbing of macOS to make iOS (networking, cocoa etc), they likely need to directly build a future iPad OS directly from macOS, instead taking a lot of desktop power and optimizing them for touch.
The iPad is meant to replace some, but not all computers; and there is nothing inferior about your computer use if an iPad can replace your computer.This is truly absurd. The iPad was never meant to replace a desktop or laptop or phone. And why should it? If you need a desktop, laptop or phone then you buy a desktop, laptop or phone.
The 9.7-inch iPad Pro was announced on March 21, 2016 and released on March 31 that same year and they’ll change the batteries on that. They should also do so on the 2017, 2018 and others since.
View attachment 2095945
iPad Repair and Service - Apple Support
Need to repair your iPad? See your service options, their costs by coverage type, and how long they take.support.apple.com
Yes, for a lot of people a tablet is perfectly suitable device for their needs. But it was never meant to be a complete replacement for all computer needs.The iPad is meant to replace some, but not all computers; and there is nothing inferior about your computer use if an iPad can replace your computer.