I’m still waiting for reviews on how well the new gestures for cut/copy/paste/undo work.
Mouse support is not really at all mouse support. There isnt any real contextual menu. You can't really right click. It allows you to assign a command to the right mouse button, IE. when you click the right mouse button after selecting text a popup saying copy will appear and you can click on it, now when you go to the place where you would like to insert the copied text and right click, the only thing that will appear is the pop up saying copy you can click, you cant paste. Now if you wanted to you could open settings and go to assistance, assign right click to copy, select text and copy, then reopen setting and go to assistance and then assign the right click button for paste, then flip back to the app you were wanting to paste in, right click and then click paste.... I don't see many people being happy with that at all really though.I know they don’t plan to turn the iPad into a laptop but for the mouse support, I pray theyhave some nice features for the Magic Mouse since I own an extra one which I could pair with my iPad Pro - Same goes for the TrackPad.
The general idea having support for these peripherals is awesome because sooner or later these devices tend to have hybrid usage.
I wonder thouhg, at that point if the MacBook would still make sense considering the power of the iPad?
Personally I use 1 MBP 15 inch TB 2018 and a iPad pro 11.
I would never consider a MB Air or MB simply because with iOS13 whatever MB and MB Air can do, an iPad can do the same.
This is an interesting line which MB and MB Air fit into... kinda blurry...
Nevertheless, I am looking foward to iPadOS for the USB drives and mouse support.
Mouse support is not really at all mouse support. There isnt any real contextual menu. You can't really right click. It allows you to assign a command to the right mouse button, IE. when you click the right mouse button after selecting text a popup saying copy will appear and you can click on it, now when you go to the place where you would like to insert the copied text and right click, the only thing that will appear is the pop up saying copy you can click, you cant paste. Now if you wanted to you could open settings and go to assistance, assign right click to copy, select text and copy, then reopen setting and go to assistance and then assign the right click button for paste, then flip back to the app you were wanting to paste in, right click and then click paste.... I don't see many people being happy with that at all really though.
I have a really simple solution for iPads, port over OSX and we will have a first class computer with all the bells and whistles.
The truth is the iPad, as successfully as it is, was crippled from the beginning by Steve Jobs management ideas and decisions. He kept the iOS and OS X departments separate and essentially competing against each other. He also never envisioned the pad as a desktop replacement.
Yes the iPadOS is an improvement and moving in the right direction. Can we add a mouse feature please!
Multitasking is still a nightmare. iPad is not intended for productivity.
Multitasking is still a nightmare. iPad is not intended for productivity.
Simply a wrong statement
Can you please refer to the thousands of existing posts that discuss this exact notion? Let’s skip to the conclusion: everyone’s work is different. Some people can be productive on an iPad and some people need a full, traditional computer. There, you good?
Except that it still won't allow you to run whatever software you want, from whatever source you want, like a real computer.
[doublepost=1560381396][/doublepost]
Well, multi-user sign-in and the ability to run whatever software you want from sources other than the app store. Then it will be a real computer.
This transition of the iPad from being a consumption device to a content creation device is taking FOREVER. All the iPad needs now is multi-user sign on. I know why they don't want to add it but it's inevitable at this point.
For company workstations or services (e.g., Netflix, Google, Amazon), especially on common area devices adds a grand amount of convenience and is ultimately essential. However, multi-user setups in a non-professional environment are at a very low demand nowadays. Exceptions could be a "family computer," but those scenarios are far between in recent years, or small children that adults don't want to purchase/assign a dedicated device.Yes true. I have been wanting this for years. As for now I don't want others to use my iPad.
I think there is only one reason. Apple don't want to sell one iPad to a family. They want to sell one to each family member. They are even working on a solution so they can sell one to the dog.
For me it is pure business/greed.
I have a really simple solution for iPads, port over OSX and we will have a first class computer with all the bells and whistles.
The truth is the iPad, as successfully as it is, was crippled from the beginning by Steve Jobs management ideas and decisions. He kept the iOS and OS X departments separate and essentially competing against each other. He also never envisioned the pad as a desktop replacement.
Yes the iPadOS is an improvement and moving in the right direction. Can we add a mouse feature please!
The form factor is quite different as is, so I would definitely prefer both, ideally anyway.
The current MacBook Pro chassis is arguably not big enough (or designed well enough) to make use of the high end processors in it. It is amazing how well they do when you look at the size of PC laptops with 6 or 8 core CPUs in them—but the idea that the iPad can do everything that a high end laptop can do just doesn’t make sense.
If you want to compare a MacBook, MacBook Air or similar, there’s absolutely a point to be made however. And I’m not sure how long customers will be okay having features not accessible to them on their ~$1K iPad Pro that exist on their ~$1K MacBook Air.
If Apple were to be brave here they could potentially make a big leap beyond Microsoft and their sorta compromised “PC as a tablet” that’s found in the Surface. But if Apple drags their feet then the Surface could really make the iPad look like a horribly hobbled device with the potential to be so much more.
Yes but that's exactly the point, you HAVE to buy 2 different pieces of hardware because something combining them doesn't exist. I don't see the Surface as a compromised PC at all, it's a PC and it functions quite well as one while IMO being the best tablet out there. But even then you can still refer to something like the surface book if you want more of a high end laptop feel.
It's fascinating to see Apple slowly but surely walk back everything they said was bad about combining the 2 worlds, just as slowly but surely Microsoft keeps advancing and getting better and better. Apple is just piece mealing this kind of stuff so consumers get excited, but not enough so they realize why can't they just have one device. PC users have already figured this out. Watch and see, hiding mouse support as an accessibility function will slowly but surely bloom into full mouse support, maybe next WWDC.
For company workstations or services (e.g., Netflix, Google, Amazon), especially on common area devices adds a grand amount of convenience and is ultimately essential. However, multi-user setups in a non-professional environment are at a very low demand nowadays. Exceptions could be a "family computer," but those scenarios are far between in recent years, or small children that adults don't want to purchase/assign a dedicated device.
Let me put it this way... How often do you leave your smartphone, tablet, or even computer available for others to use? Probably rarely if ever. Why? Foremost, due to privacy concerns by you and anyone that would utilize the device. If you do share a device, such as an iPad in the kitchen for recipes, it has little personal information stored in it and thus doesn't warrant the need for multiple sign-ins anyway.
How about when you have 3 or 4 kids in the house that you share an iPad with and you don’t want to see your screen cluttered with their apps or have access to your personal email, messages, etc. Sounds like a perfectly good use case to me.
[doublepost=1560428816][/doublepost]
Yes, I realize that but I don’t manage a school. I manage 4 kids who all share the same iPad and I don’t have the cash flow to buy one for them all.
[doublepost=1560429224][/doublepost]
Why does it not make sense for a family that shares an iPad to each have their own login with their own content, emails and messages separate from everyone else’s? I think it makes perfect sense. And you’re wrong about families buying a single iPad and sharing it. I can’t be the only one. Apple loves to think we’re all loaded with so much cash that we can just buy iPads like they’re candy but sadly that’s not the case (at least not in my household).
Personally, I'd rather have the two pieces of hardware. But I sort of agree that Surface nailed the best basic design. Apple was right that touch screens on a conventional laptop form factor suck, but seems to have been wrong about a lot of other stuff.
I’ll respectfully disagree (see my replies below). I have a 9 year old iMac that my kids use daily and an iPad with Apple Pencil that they all use as well. Why is it too much to ask for mult-user iPad support in this situation when my 12 year old son and 8 year old daughter have completely different tastes in apps and games? And what if I would like to use it as well? It would seem that no one that’s replied to my comments has a family or kids to speak of.
I disagree that touch screens on a conventional laptop suck. You don't have to necessarily use that function, but it's still nice to have for many reasons. My wife has a Dell touchscreen laptop, she doesn't want a surface pro but has become a touchscreen convert big time. As a banker she has to use all kinds of financial programs and such and feels the touchscreen adds functionality in certain scenarios. While I believe Apple is dead wrong about touchscreens on a laptop it seems pretty obvious to me that they didn't omit touchscreens because they thought it wasn't a good fit. They omitted touchscreens because, once again, they didn't want consumers questioning why they had to have 2 devices.
[doublepost=1560453034][/doublepost]
Multi user sign in is a HUGE HUGE deal when you have a family sharing the device, even if it's just you and a spouse. Not only for convenience, but there is a lot of stuff I don't necessarily want my kids to access. I'm really baffled that Apple hasn't implemented this yet, other than assuming it's their way of differentiating this from OSx and the need to buy 2 devices. But seeing how piss poor Apple's support for parental control of kids use on iOS is, it doesn't surprise me either. I stopped letting my kids use their ipads a while ago because I didn't feel I had any level of control over what they did. Really the model to follow is how Amazon handles parental control on their devices.
FINALLY, someone is backing me up. Everyone else here thinks I’m crazy asking for multi-user support on the iPad. Ha!
People don’t think you’re crazy - they’ve said you are a minority case and as such, that feature will likely not make it to the iPad anytime soon. Apple themselves have already stated the main use case for the iPad is as an individual device. Yes, your use case is different but it is still a minority amongst the user base. Just like Apple have stated that a touch screen isn’t ergonomic on a Laptop, yet there are a minority of users here stating they like the touchscreen of the Surface Pro.
Maybe you should look at the surface pro as it seems to tick your box of multi-user login at a similar price to an iPad?
How about when you have 3 or 4 kids in the house that you share an iPad with and you don’t want to see your screen cluttered with their apps or have access to your personal email, messages, etc. Sounds like a perfectly good use case to me.
[doublepost=1560428816][/doublepost]
Yes, I realize that but I don’t manage a school. I manage 4 kids who all share the same iPad and I don’t have the cash flow to buy one for them all.
[doublepost=1560429224][/doublepost]
Why does it not make sense for a family that shares an iPad to each have their own login with their own content, emails and messages separate from everyone else’s? I think it makes perfect sense. And you’re wrong about families buying a single iPad and sharing it. I can’t be the only one. Apple loves to think we’re all loaded with so much cash that we can just buy iPads like they’re candy but sadly that’s not the case (at least not in my household).
I’m not arguing that shared accounts are a bad thing. I was just explaining that for the most part we have moved away from the shared family computer model to everyone has their own smartphone (computer). Keep in mind that in the early days there was no user account for the family computer either. User accounts were more something that enterprise or library used. Your “user account” in the past was most likely your individual AOL or Compuserve account (email and IM). That model still persists today (gmail, yahoo mail) via web browser instead of dial up. Mac and Windows still to this day have shared programs and that’s the default installation model and that would be the case for iPad too if it got multi user accounts.
There’s a lot of fringe cases that have to be solved for shared iPad user accounts:
How does the user get logged out? Is it a time delay? Does the lock screen always show all the user accounts?
How does that affect Find My... app. If the user logs out what account takes over for locating lost or stolen iPad?
iPad serial or UUID is tied to individual iMessage account currently and also tied into iPhone for forwarding messages. How does all that get resolved? How does 2 factor authentication prompt work if another used is logged into the iPad? What happens to photos when they need to sync and the iPad doesn’t have enough storage? Delete other user accounts data to free up space? How does the system securely access a users data while another is logged in? It’s a very complicated programming problem.
Apple TV doesn’t have any of these problems because there’s no email or iMessage or 2 factor cruft to figure out. It does have photos but there’s never a guarantee that they are stored locally so it’s not a hard change to say that thumbnails and photos will always be downloaded and to toss the photos cache out when a new user logs in.
You will also need a Digital Ocean paid account with an instance of at least 8GB RAM for running Docker (that Coder is being installed to) and VS Code extensions - $40+/month. And if you work over LTE you will pay $$$ for your cellular data. Lag will highly depend on your connection.
You won't see the lag on the videos because it's a lag between your click on the keyboard and the screen change. I tried Coder with 200Mbps fiber Internet 100 meters between workstations, not even cellular, and the lag was extremely noticeable.
I don't think it's a solution for coding on the iPad, it's just one of the playgrounds for testing small code edits for simple web app development.
I already have the iPad and I really don’t think my use case is that different from many families who own an iPad. I would just like multi-user support on the iPad now. Maybe it will arrive with iOS 14.
I’m not arguing that shared accounts are a bad thing. I was just explaining that for the most part we have moved away from the shared family computer model to everyone has their own smartphone (computer). Keep in mind that in the early days there was no user account for the family computer either. User accounts were more something that enterprise or library used. Your “user account” in the past was most likely your individual AOL or Compuserve account (email and IM). That model still persists today (gmail, yahoo mail) via web browser instead of dial up. Mac and Windows still to this day have shared programs and that’s the default installation model and that would be the case for iPad too if it got multi user accounts.
There’s a lot of fringe cases that have to be solved for shared iPad user accounts:
How does the user get logged out? Is it a time delay? Does the lock screen always show all the user accounts?
How does that affect Find My... app. If the user logs out what account takes over for locating lost or stolen iPad?
iPad serial or UUID is tied to individual iMessage account currently and also tied into iPhone for forwarding messages. How does all that get resolved? How does 2 factor authentication prompt work if another used is logged into the iPad? What happens to photos when they need to sync and the iPad doesn’t have enough storage? Delete other user accounts data to free up space? How does the system securely access a users data while another is logged in? It’s a very complicated programming problem.
Apple TV doesn’t have any of these problems because there’s no email or iMessage or 2 factor cruft to figure out. It does have photos but there’s never a guarantee that they are stored locally so it’s not a hard change to say that thumbnails and photos will always be downloaded and to toss the photos cache out when a new user logs in.