Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This review sounded like he wanted to say how awesome the Pixel 3 is but is bounded by a contract to not do so lol

But really, I have to say as a long time Apple fan, the Pixel 3 is really much smarter of a smartphone than the iPhone. And it's more comfortable in the hand. Apple needs to forget about using "premium" materials that do nothing but make it more fragile and heavy, and get more utilitarian like Google.
This post sounded like a Google hardware engineer defending the ugliest phone of 2018.

Seriously, it's objectively hideous and the spyware that is Android is a big enough reason to not buy it.

I'd literally rather use an iPhone SE over the Pixel 3.
 
This would be a mistake. The iPhone is not a utilitarian product. It is a premium one for the bourgeoisie. Leave the utitilitariam for the plebeians.

Imagine the embarrassment of being seen with a cheap phone like a Pixel! It is the ultimate social status killer. As bad as driving an economy American car.

Funny, anecdotes abound from Pixel owners who say people often ask if it’s an iPhone.

Once you put your iCandy phone in a tacky case, the luxury is no longer apparent.
 
Interesting, but I am way too deep into Apple’s ecosystem to make a switch

Dan, how is the screen in comparison to the Note 9? Is it as vibrant? People think I’m weird because I like those crazy Samsung screens
 
  • Like
Reactions: roncron
I honestly cannot possibly see how anybody would want one of these over an iPhone X or XS. Google really messed up this one.

Aesthetically and functionally, there is simply no justification for that notch if it doesn’t have face recognition and an edge-to-edge display. Let’s couple that with the fact it’s still expensive as hell, chews through your personal data like Gregg Wallace at a buffet, has half the CPU performance, and has very poor support with excessive week+ repair times if something goes wrong.

Google are a massive company. If they made this at a competitive price point for marketshare, I can see the appeal. At this cost and what it offers, it doesn’t even blow other Android devices out of the water, let alone the phone it’s trying to mimick.
 
Proof that Apple's pricing is purely based on greedy profits.

Two points.

One, this doesn't offer any kind of proof of anything. It has a "better" camera and otherwise is inferior in just about every other aspect. The device is one thing. The software and associated services is another. There is undeniably a value placed on the software. The Pixel obviously doesn't run iOS. It's all subjective.

Two, Apple should get as much for the hardware it sells as the market will accept. That's basics of any business venture. They are not a monopoly. You, as a customer, have choices. Want an iPhone? Pay a premium. Can't fault them for that. Aside from this, the cost of the hardware has been pegged somewhere in the upper $400 range, which would give Apple similar margins to any other retailer, less alone a tech company with a considerably higher R&D budget. The only exception where I may agree is the cost of upgraded storage.
 
Seems like a lot of comments from people who have probably never seen a Pixel, never mind, owned one. I have an iPhone XS, I came from a Pixel 2, a Pixel before that and Nexus before them. They are very polished and a very smooth OS. Funny how a chin is now completely frowned upon, iPhones always had the biggest but little was said.

By the way, I like my iPhone XS, it's fabulous, what will be my next phone in a couple of years? Any one of the flagship devices from Apple/Samsung/Google, I don't know which one yet, but it is nice to be prejudice free.
 
It seems as if no one else (except Apple) has any idea what good design is. Like zero idea.

I mean look at that hideousness.

Don't even get me started on how all other companies are fighting over Apple Notch™ like baboons and macaques, and can't for the love of god decide what it should look like.

I mean, are they morons or something?

What I don’t understand is that on the iPhone X design language the outer rounded corners have the same radius. Compare that to this Pixel design where the top rounded corners radius is not symmetric to the bottom. It just comes across as a cheap knockoff. I would not have expected this from a multi-billion dollar company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleFan78
One could deal with the notch. But the chin? Jeebus those are some homely phones.

Google incorporates the notch because everyone is doing it now. What strikes me as odd is that like the Mii Mix 2 the components in the notch can be integrated into the chin.

The two most compelling phone designs is the iPhone X (not a fan of the notch, however not distracting as some make it out to be) and the Mii Mix 2.

Everything else seems like the design and engineering department were intoxicted and high and sent this to production without any vetting process, shameful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: picaman
Hilarious to see all the bashing of this phone. Of course if it were an Apple phone people would likely be praising it. It will definately have a better camera than the 10s and has a much better price point as well.
 
4K60 is still not available. Only the iPhone can do true 4K60. OK the Galaxy S9 can, but only for a couple of minutes, then it overheats.

Is 4K60 really something people care about in the real world? Don't most people prefer to shoot 4K content at 24 or 30 fps?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.