Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
so Disney, Paramount (to name just a couple) are not "major" companies, ok. And in your mind the 2 "major" ones are YouTube and Netflix, ok.
I don't really think you know what the Pro is, but feel free to continue to post "facts" ... you are entitled to your opinion
You must be an existing Apple employee.

As a former Apple employee of six years, follow the light and exit the tunnel.

Stop being such a pretentious snoot for a company that does not care about your existence; they just want to rip your existence off and make money from it.
 
I am actually surprised that Apple didn't bother to port Pages and Numbers.

Yes, yes, use the iPad apps people say… sure.

But if Apple is to show it is serious about this AVP being a productive tool and not just a passive consumption device, then they really should have put in a few hours to just get that done.

Because if even Apple couldn't see how Pages would be an improved experience locked in to an AVP, then heck, why should we?
 
But they've been developing this device for something like 7 years.
It doesn't make sense to start porting most apps until the decision has been made that the hardware/concept is now good enough to be released, and that probably wasn't that long ago (not much more than a year). And for certain apps there are diminishing returns to specifically adapt them for the AVP. It's not like 15 years ago where there were only a dozen relatively simple apps.

What's more disappointing is that there doesn't seem to be much that would take advantage of the "new spatial computing paradigm", apart from Dinosaurs and Meditation.
 
I think I remember the same posts about the iPhone, iPad, watch etc......


I thought their stock was up this week because of Vision (goes off to look)

"Apple (AAPL) stock rose Thursday after BofA Securities turned positive on the consumer electronics maker, citing artificial intelligence and the company's upcoming Vision Pro headset as sales drivers. BofA analyst Wamsi Mohan upgraded Apple stock to buy from neutral and raised his price target to 225 from 208"

So not everyone agrees with you...I'm happy to put a reminder on my iPhone for 2 years to see where we are with this tech then.....
 
Last edited:
I think apple changed the smart watch from niche tbh -


I'm saying that a watch was common. Switching to a smartwatch, from a regular watch, was an easy move for people. Same as switching from a t9 flip to a smartphone.

My point is, this isn't replacing an existing category like watches and smartphones did/do. It's not upgrading or fixing an existing category.
 
Good point, sadly this is probably the best hope for iPadOS to get some real attention.
Possible, but I doubt it.

If Apple's first products were the phone & tablet with a desktop platform coming later, we wouldn't have the flexibility we do today with macOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarAnalogy
I'm saying that a watch was common. Switching to a smartwatch, from a regular watch, was an easy move for people. Same as switching from a t9 flip to a smartphone.

My point is, this isn't replacing an existing category like watches and smartphones did/do. It's not upgrading or fixing an existing category.

It all keeps coming back around to the idea that what we want is smart glasses in the current glasses form factor, but that tech is so far in the future right now we can’t even see it. I don’t know if this is going to be close enough or even get us close enough. I don’t know if it’s even physically possible. Seems like this is how we find out.
 
"Regularly-sized glasses" have to solve the power problem: in such a tiny amount of area, where's the energy source? For that you need wireless energy which seems to be electrified pie in the sky. Else some kind of insanely efficient solar cell innovation. Else bring back beanie hats with propellers in very high wind environments. Else, some kind of magic.

Otherwise, there are basically existing cracks are regular glasses products now. See XReal for one good, fairly-polished example. Here's the latest version coming soon...


How do they solve the power problem? They must connect to a computing device that houses the battery. And how do they process the video one sees? The other device does that. How do you block out the bright light environments to not "cloud" the view? You would need some kind of other type of thing to wrap all around the exposed edges. Else bright light will get in between eyes and screens and dampen-to-overpower the virtual stuff you want to see.

So instead of a little battery with Vpro, you need a big battery and computer for XReal. You won't look as "odd" with XReal since they look more like glasses, but you will have to have this other tech to use them... and seek out (I wear my sunglasses at night) darker areas unless you can come up with some idea to keep the edge brightness from sneaking in underneath the lenses: like the old thick towel over one's head trick when trying to check a mobile screen at the beach... which then makes one look odd to complete strangers on that beach... even if the glasses look more typical.

I think the want would have great trouble in "regular glasses" too for the light intrusion and obviously the battery issue. So what we probably actually want is some kind of implant that won't need the glasses and is- in effect- invisible to others. That too still faces the powering problem but overcomes light intrusion. Which comes first: wireless energy or VR implants that work as well? Obviously, one of those must come first. So then the question is when?

And then does user of implant look like they may be dead when watching something in VR with their eyes open (that glazed over look)? Or does user look like they are asleep with eyes closed? If the latter, do they look odd to seem like they may be asleep but plunking away at the keyboard on the tray table while they type an email or WP document? As you can imagine, even the probably pie in the sky implant hypothetical has these "do I look stupid" scenarios.

The moral of the story??? Perhaps take a C.S.N classic message to heart...

 
Last edited:
Apple’s VR is dead on arrival.

This is a result of Apple’s poor relationship with app developers and competitors.

As we have now seen all the major companies Apple desperately needs are not only not developing for Vision Pro but are yanking their iPad versions from being compatible too.

I suspect their behaviour with the 27% third party app store fee this week has been the straw that broke the camels back.

Downvote me all you want but these are facts… they have no interest at all supporting Apple’s entry into another new category and for once Apple needs them more than they need Apple.

Apple are screwed.
Vision Pro is dead on arrival.
Save this post and look at it again in two years.
I think it’s too soon to conclude that. They have a video where they announce the availability of more than a million apps. Sounds great. Granted, most are iPad apps.

The bigger question is: are there compelling use cases and is it comfortable. Personally, I don’t see any advantage in making or viewing Keynotes with this thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gleepskip
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.