Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, no. iPhone sales disappointed Wall Street. AAPL took a big hit even though Apple reported better than expected earnings. AAPL did not recover until April when the stock split was announced.

iPhones sales beat estimates the past two quarters. The stock split really did nothing to invigorate the share price.
 
Didn't the 5C bomb? What's the point in confusing consumers and hurting the brand with garbage devices that nobody wants?

The 5C did not 'bomb' and neither is it a garbage device.

However, I'm all for lineup clarity. If there are going to be two screen sizes, they need to leave it there. Sure, pick capacity, but not high-end AND low-end for both screen sizes.
 
my Iphone is a tool and i dont have time to baby it.

so yes there are people that would like scratch resistant and not spend money on those stupid screen protectors.

I am happy with the thickness of the 5 if they put more battery in there thinness doesn't matter so much to me it's thin enough.

Oh but apple will no doubt make it thinner with the same amount of battery life

I don't put stupid screen protectors either

In fact apple needs to make a more durable casing. One that doesn't chip nor crack(glass)

Seriously apple gets such a pass on their crappy paint that flakes off.

How about work on those issues first
 
There are a lot of parallels between the smartphone and auto markets. Plenty of people will buy commodity cars (Kias, Toyota Corollas, Ford Focuses, etc) yet luxury automakers who sell far fewer cars reap immense profits from the market.

The top 10% of the population has well over half of all the money. It's very profitable to have products that cater to these customers and that are completely unaffordable to the bottom 50% or more.
 
i want the best, but i have no desire for a 5.5" phone (as i'm sure a lot of people feel) and it will be super disappointing if i have to get a 4.7" phone that is lesser in terms of specs/display/etc

Yeah, I completely understand. It would be nice for folks like you to have certain “high end” options across model lines, so it was a totally open choice of size + display + etc.

I guess we’ll see in less than a month :cool:
 
The top 10% of the population has well over half of all the money. It's very profitable to have products that cater to these customers and that are completely unaffordable to the bottom 50% or more.

Absolutely. But it also makes sense not to dilute the brand image. BMW doesn't make a 10k car because of a conscious decision, not because they can't.
 
How so?

And you re not really sucking it up because sapphire isn't something you want anyway. What if the 4.7" model had the better camera technology?

I still don't get it. Who says the technology in either will be bad? It won't so what's the point of crying? Jeez, both will be good phones and I don't care what either have. I got a 5c over the 5s. I have had no problems whatsoever with this phone, then again I don't worry about what someone else got. It's about whether mine does the job or not and I have yet to see a new iphone that didn't..

To me it seems childish to worry about if if one model has slightly better hardware unless there's proof of the phone not working well. Makes me think of kids on a playground worrying about what everyone else has.
 
I've seen price discounts on the 5S. Did it not do well?

I see Android constantly in "buy 1 get 1" deals - flagships. Did they not do well?

As others have pointed out, Cook's words had to do with the MIX of iPhones - they expected the demand for the 5S and 5C to be more equal when it was more skewed the 5S's way. You take that to mean the 5C tanked - or perhaps the 5S was just a bigger success than people thought.

Regardless of what you say, there isn't a smartphone ever that can be the second best selling smartphone in the world (only behind its beefier brother) and be considered a "failure".

Cook's word "mix" is corporatespeak for "sale did not match our expectations; we made too many 5C's and not enough 5S's." If those people who like to quote Cook on that want to take it as something else like a lemming, that's fine, but financial world who parses corporatespeak did not. Having been in the PR world, I'm with the financial world's interpretation. Executives are never crystal clear about mediocre news unless they have a legal obligation to be so. Cook did not here.

The discounts on the 5C in Jan were not tiny ones, like the 5S, they were rather significant. And yes, all those Android sales you see are because it's not doing all that well in the U.S. where the iPhone rules. Take a look at Samsung stock because of not so great sales of its Android phones in the U.S., esp. the Galaxy.
 
Apple know that iphone 5c was a fail compared to 5s given the high price. Its crazy to think that Apple will increase the prices given that all smarthphones got cheaper in the recent years. Apple is trying to enter deeper in China, India and other huge markets where the price is an important factor. And when I say price i mean non contract device.
 
Cook's word "mix" is corporatespeak for "sale did not match our expectations; we made too many 5C's and not enough 5S's." If those people who like to quote Cook on that want to take it as something else like a lemming, that's fine, but financial world who parses corporatespeak did not. Having been in the PR world, I'm with the financial world's interpretation. Executives are never crystal clear about mediocre news unless they have a legal obligation to be so. Cook did not here.

The discounts on the 5C in Jan were not tiny ones, like the 5S, they were rather significant. And yes, all those Android sales you see are because it's not doing all that well in the U.S. where the iPhone rules. Take a look at Samsung stock because of not so great Android sales in the U.S.

No, it means that the consumer, faced with the choice between the 5c and the 5s choose the 5s at a rate higher than Apple's expectations. The 5c massively increased sales in the midrange segment for Apple (look at 1 year old 4s sales).

What is not doing well in the US? Owning more than 50% of the market with a year over year increase in sales? Because those two things are fact.
 

Want me to show you the data? You don't seem to believe me on information that is publicly available.

----------

Luxury is 4X more than you can afford (for all categories of you). The guys who own the 15 meter yachts think the 30 meter ones are the luxury ones. The guy driving the 15 year old beater thinks a brand new Camry is luxury. And so on.

You don't believe Apple is considered the luxury phone brand in the world?
 
So, this suggests that there will be variety between iPhones that's not color or size of storage? I don't know why, but that seems unlikely since the average joe may not know the difference. Also, I'm sure most people would opt to buy the "cheaper" one anyway.

Exactly; over 95% of the iPhone user base have no clue what a sapphire glass is and what the benefits are. And over 80% don't know that the iPhone is increasing to 4.7". Many people will be genuinely shocked during the announcement.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.