I know that. I'm just stating that people will have to buy a $19.99 adapter for any laptop (be that macbook or macbook pro) that will convert the firewire 800/1600 port to a firewire 400..
Its short for this:
![]()
Sorry, this thread shoots down your theory entirely.
That's fine for the MBP in these pics, but the based on the leaked images, it doesn't look like the MB will have any FW connection, 400 or 800.
and in a strangely ironic fashion, when he asked what "facepalm" meant... i definitely resembled the above picture.
how so? can you explain what it says? it now says that "the page you are requesting cannot be found"...
well if that's the case.....darnit apple..
well i do live in a teepee in oklahoma so...i don't know much
you guys make me feel like an idiot now lol..![]()
you guys just wait.....i also think there is a possibility that Apple purposely told someone to take these pics and post them (they have been known in previous years to leak false images) just so that the event will be a larger shock than it would have originally been...![]()
Why are people so against the chiclet keyboard!Hope so, I want a full size DVI port on the MBP..... and the current keyboard. Not the chiclet one.....![]()
If a new MB w/o FW is true, will there be any out-crying by the mac community like the missing FW800 on the first gen. MBPs?
Why are people so against the chiclet keyboard!
More like mass-suicide of the mac cult.
Am I the only one who for the first time thinks "I won't get my hopes up about this event. As long as we get something at least equal to what we have now, it's all good.", then it ends up being worse?![]()
Ah well, we don't know anything for sure until Tuesday/Wednesday.
Well, I just prefer the current one.....![]()
Oh, they do list specs on some products.
But anyway... that's why I looked up specs at manufacturer's sites.
Oh.... I can see why you're pointing this out.
But I really knew this (1394b being FW800, just for the record).
OK, you got me.
But these DV cameras aren't the stylish, small and "cool" new ones to entice consumers, I suppose?
I mean... nowadays cameras recording on some flash device are the hot stuff, right?
This is also somewhat indicated by the fact that Canon only have 3 miniDV models at the bottom of the page.
So this seems to be yesterday's tech (for the consumer market!).
Well... how come Sony don't say so?
On the specs page it clearly says:
USB Port(s) : Hi-speed (2.0 compliant)
Digital Audio/Video Output(s) : Yes (via USB)
i.LINK® Interface : N/A
At least one of them supports USB streaming.
(And yes, I know about their compatibility issues and them being non-standard as I have experienced this first-hand, the only time I tried some video cutting on my Mac).
Sure.
That's a very valid point ...for becoming a problem for some users.
But not for Apple to keep FireWire.
I don't think they give much about that.
Cause the fancy new cameras work with USB.
The point is that you can get new cameras which work without FW.
And even if you're new to all this, you're more and more likely to get a camera without FW.
Seems like that's what companies want to sell to you, while FW gets phased out on these cams.
And Apple itself is notorious for ceasing support for older tech.
(Don't get me wrong. Personally I'm all for Apple to keep the FW ports on the MacBook. Just don't think that's what Apple has in mind)
Well... how come Sony don't say so?
On the specs page it clearly says:
USB Port(s) : Hi-speed (2.0 compliant)
Digital Audio/Video Output(s) : Yes (via USB)
i.LINK® Interface : N/A
At least one of them supports USB streaming.
(And yes, I know about their compatibility issues and them being non-standard as I have experienced this first-hand, the only time I tried some video cutting on my Mac).
Sure.
That's a very valid point ...for becoming a problem for some users.
But not for Apple to keep FireWire.
I don't think they give much about that.
Cause the fancy new cameras work with USB.
The point is that you can get new cameras which work without FW.
And even if you're new to all this, you're more and more likely to get a camera without FW.
Seems like that's what companies want to sell to you, while FW gets phased out on these cams.
And Apple itself is notorious for ceasing support for older tech.
(Don't get me wrong. Personally I'm all for Apple to keep the FW ports on the MacBook. Just don't think that's what Apple has in mind)
A random guess - A finger print scanner?
I always thought these were a bit naff. But who knows. Its the right position for it, convenient location for the users hand but out of the way so as not to detract from the visual appearance of the design.
On second thought it would be hard to scan with. Tricky to get the left thumb to and requires a hand-cross over move to get the right thumb to.
Ok - maybe a dumb idea.
Why are people so against the chiclet keyboard!