Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I disagree entirely. Yes, the financial companies may not be happy until facial recognition is a proven technology but they won't pull-out entirely, more likely to say "passcode only on those new phones" and throw the ball back into Apple's court until they either sort out TouchID or demonstrate the security of their facial recognition implementation.
Don't forget they still have to support 7s/7s+ buyers.
But think of this. In that case, there is no way for financial companies to restrict these phones to only using passcodes. The only solution (until facial recognition is proven) would be for Apple themselves to disable biometrics as a verification method for ApplePay in the iPhone 8, or for providers to restrict ApplePay use to only phones with a fingerprint scanner (and depending on how the tech works, I'm not sure if that's possible). In both situations, iPhone 8 owners largely lose the use of ApplePay, which will drive down iPhone 8 demand and hit Apple where it hurts most, their wallet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
Why does anyone think Apple would refer to it in their own software with something really attention-grabbing? Did he really expect to see a string of code with "NEW SUPER ULTRASONIC TOP SECRET FINGERPRINT SCANNER YES ITS UNDER THE DISPLAY" in it? It could still be referred to by the Home Indicator area, which is at least something new. Or perhaps its still called Touch ID. In general, I find it highly, highly unlikely that Apple would remove Touch ID. Many services depend on it and facial recognition does not match Apple's finger print reading capabilities for the sake of identity authentication.
 
Anyone else find it odd that homepod software contains so much data about an unreleased upcoming iPhone? Seems really weird to me... This is either a deliberate Apple controlled leak or something weird is going on. Perhaps some misdirection?
 
It goes without saying, faces are much more complex than fingerprints. Also, fingerprints have been used throughout history to identify people. It's entirely possible that they could have created a completely reliable facial recognition software, but I have a hard time believing companies will back the tech (especially in the beginning). Lastly, I hate to play into your "it's faster to type in a password" argument, but scanning your face when making an in-store person does seem very cumbersome and awkward...

Faces have been used to identify people for far longer through history because, you know, we look at them.

You have absolutely no clue how the technology you’re talking about works and it seems like you’d rather keep your eyes closed than even look at the details supplied in this leak...
 
Hard to say that something that hasn't been released yet is less reliable. They have been working on this for years, maybe it works better than touch ID?
True, which means for now we can only go off of the current tech available today, which I don't think anyone would argue even comes close to TouchIDs reliability. Also, there are many things that can change the way you look on a day-to-day basis (i.e. glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). Faces are much more complex than fingerprints, which are just two-dimensional images that largely remain the same your entire life.
 
It's not the removing of TouchID that's the issue, it's the replacement of it with a less reliable biometric scanner. If companies aren't comfortable with facial scanners, and there's no way for them to ensure that you can only use a passcode as a method of verification, they will pull out completely.
Samsung Pay can use the Iris scanner. If banks are ok with that. I'm pretty sure they're going to be ok with what Apple puts out. Apple isn't some fly by night company. Apple Pay if I remember correctly forces you to put a pin code on your phone. That's still better than using a regular bank card that you might lose and person can swipe as credit and clean you out before you realize that your card is missing. Cashiers hardly ever ask for ID
 
Last edited:
You have absolutely no clue how the technology you’re talking about works and it seems like you’d rather keep your eyes closed than even look at the details supplied in this leak...
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?

Faces are MUCH more complex than two-dimensional images of a fingerprint, and like I said before there are factors that change the way you look daily (glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). We as humans have trouble recognizing people who go from full bearded to completely shaven overnight, you think a computer is going to see through that?
 
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?

Faces are MUCH more complex than two-dimensional images of a fingerprint, and like I said before there are factors that change the way you look daily (glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). We as humans have trouble recognizing people who go from full bearded to completely shaven overnight, you think a computer is going to see through that?

Well, if you look into Apple's investments into technology for the last few years, which includes camera processing, AR development, 3D camera input, AI development *specifically* for facial recognition: I'd say that they've got a better foundation than you're giving them credit for... and mainly from your posts I'd say it is because these topics are outside of your skillset or knowledgebase. You're just offshotting things that could go wrong without much credible point other than what if.

You also fail to consider the level that Apple must have achieved to felt confident to remove Touch ID from their flagship with something like this as a replacement.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mescagnus and Syk
But think of this. In that case, there is no way for financial companies to restrict these phones to only using passcodes. The only solution (until facial recognition is proven) would be for Apple themselves to disable biometrics as a verification method for ApplePay in the iPhone 8, or for providers to restrict ApplePay use to only phones with a fingerprint scanner (and depending on how the tech works, I'm not sure if that's possible). In both situations, iPhone 8 owners largely lose the use of ApplePay, which will drive down iPhone 8 demand and hit Apple where it hurts most, their wallet.
Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!
It's not beyond the realms of possibility for Apple to screw a model up. It's a first generation product, a next-generation iPhone, compromises are to be expected and of course even if the worse came to the worse and ApplePay was restricted to a passcode for now Apple would simply point you to a 7s/7s+ if you found the situation unacceptable. Hell, maybe that's why they're keeping those models around until the iPhone 8 is sorted out. Think of this years model as a sneek-peek into the future.
 
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?

Faces are MUCH more complex than two-dimensional images of a fingerprint, and like I said before there are factors that change the way you look daily (glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). We as humans have trouble recognizing people who go from full bearded to completely shaven overnight, you think a computer is going to see through that?

If it's someone I know and have dealings with, no I don't have trouble recognizing them from going from full beard to clean shaving or even different hair styles. Our brains process certain facial features and says hey that's so and so.
I'm just guessing here but I'm going to bet the more a person uses the facial software the better it becomes at learning who it's seeing.
 
True, which means for now we can only go off of the current tech available today, which I don't think anyone would argue even comes close to TouchIDs reliability. Also, there are many things that can change the way you look on a day-to-day basis (i.e. glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). Faces are much more complex than fingerprints, which are just two-dimensional images that largely remain the same your entire life.

I think we should just wait and see what Apple does to implement. No point arguing over and over that their solution won't work when we have no idea what it will be like. Your points aren't some revelation, I am sure Apple is aware of them.
 
Weird question - Say the facial detection is a near instantaneous thing.... What is preventing somebody from grabbing your phone and holding it up to your face to unlock it. Not to sound crazy but that is much easier than grabbing somebody's hand and forcing their finger onto the home button, and I can actually see it being a problem.
I was thinking the same thing... you're in a crowded place, sitting at a table or bar, attention is elsewhere or in a conversation, someone could angle your phone at you without you noticing at lot easier than they could grab your hand...
 
Well, if you look into Apple's investments into technology for the last few years, which includes camera processing, AR development, 3D camera input, AI development *specifically* for facial recognition: I'd say that they've got a better foundation than you're giving them credit for... and mainly from your posts I'd say it is because these topics are outside of your skillset or knowledgebase. You're just offshotting things that could go wrong without much credible point other than what if.

You also fail to consider the level that Apple must have achieved to felt confident to remove Touch ID from their flagship with something like this, new and/or horribly implemented prior, as a replacement.
It's less I fail to consider their achievement, and more that I've lost faith in them. You're right, I'm not an engineer and don't know exactly how it works, but they sure as **** haven't been instilling confidence in the last few releases.

My main gripe comes with the iPhone 7. They copped out on redesign for the 7 and I was OK with that being under the impression they were taking their time to completely redesign the 8 and make it leaps and bounds ahead of anything else. To now discover they are getting rid of TouchID on the 8, it feels more like damage control than confidence in their new tech. I whole-heartedly believe Apple spent 3 years trying to implement TouchID under the display and they couldn't do it. Now they're playing catch up.

So when I bash facial recognition, it's not that I'm against the tech, it's that there is still a use for a fingerprint scanner. It's not a mature product yet, this isn't the headphone jack "courage" bit. It's Apple failed and is now picking up the pieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!
It's not beyond the realms of possibility for Apple to screw a model up. It's a first generation product, a next-generation iPhone, compromises are to be expected and of course even if the worse came to the worse and ApplePay was restricted to a passcode for now Apple would simply point you to a 7s/7s+ if you found the situation unacceptable. Hell, maybe that's why they're keeping those models around until the iPhone 8 is sorted out. Think of this years model as a sneek-peek into the future.
And that's my biggest issue with it all. I'm not against facial recognition, I think it's the tech of the future. I just don't believe we're there yet. In conjunction with TouchID, facial recognition is great. But let's be honest, what's happening here is Apple failed to implement TouchID under the display and is trying to find another way to bring a fullscreen iPhone to market.
 
Anyone else find it odd that homepod software contains so much data about an unreleased upcoming iPhone? Seems really weird to me... This is either a deliberate Apple controlled leak or something weird is going on. Perhaps some misdirection?
Yes and no. I think all of these things run various iterations of iOS so it's not the weird. Sloppy coding (lack of cleanup) is essentially what leads us here.

I'd be very surprised if this was intentional misdirection, but maybe.
 
To now discover they are getting rid of TouchID on the 8, it feels more like damage control than confidence in their new tech. I whole-heartedly believe Apple spent 3 years trying to implement TouchID under the display and they couldn't do it. Now they're playing catch up..
To be fair they have to release something with an edge-to-edge OLED screen or they're going to look old-fashioned next to the competition; people really are that guidable and finicky and will buy on looks alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!
It's not beyond the realms of possibility for Apple to screw a model up. It's a first generation product, a next-generation iPhone, compromises are to be expected and of course even if the worse came to the worse and ApplePay was restricted to a passcode for now Apple would simply point you to a 7s/7s+ if you found the situation unacceptable. Hell, maybe that's why they're keeping those models around until the iPhone 8 is sorted out. Think of this years model as a sneek-peek into the future.
My main concern is anyone being able to point my phone at my face and unlock it from there. Mind you, the concern isn't astronomically high, but I can see privacy issues arise from this. Plus, how easy would it be for a police officer to just point your phone at your face and get whatever they want off your phone in the spot? Again, not a huge concern of mine, but curious how it is addressed.

At the end of the day we were having similar discussions before Touch ID. Thatworked out fine. So I'm absolutely willing to let Apple show me what I don't know. Itnwill suck to have to dunk touchid though. If true of course.
 
And that's my biggest issue with it all. I'm not against facial recognition, I think it's the tech of the future. I just don't believe we're there yet. In conjunction with TouchID, facial recognition is great. But let's be honest, what's happening here is Apple failed to implement TouchID under the display and is trying to find another way to bring a fullscreen iPhone to market.

Perhaps integrating it under the display caused more problems than solutions: without a ring, maybe aligning fingers without explicitly looking at the screen was a hassle. Maybe, since it was under the display, fingerprints became an even larger problem. The what-ifs can extend in both directions so asking them without credible answers is pointless. It seems as though Apple found a solution that they are willing to be big on.

You say you expected a full redesign for 8 and that is what you are getting. Something that is redrawn and outside the box. You can't ask for those things then throw a tantrum when the small preview you get doesn't match what existed before.
 
My main concern is anyone being able to point my phone at my face and unlock it from there. Mind you, the concern isn't astronomically high, but I can see privacy issues arise from this. Plus, how easy would it be for a police officer to just point your phone at your face and get whatever they want off your phone in the spot? Again, not a huge concern of mine, but curious how it is addressed.
Isn't Apple's whole remit "solutions for the 90%"? (at least it was under Jobs). There are always going to be scenarios where it "fails" in a given situation. The simple truth is if these concerns are paramount to you then it's simply not the phone for you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.