Let's just wait and see before we are all doom and gloom. I am sure Apple has thought of the same things as you.
I'm sure you're right. Or at least, I hope you are.
Let's just wait and see before we are all doom and gloom. I am sure Apple has thought of the same things as you.
But think of this. In that case, there is no way for financial companies to restrict these phones to only using passcodes. The only solution (until facial recognition is proven) would be for Apple themselves to disable biometrics as a verification method for ApplePay in the iPhone 8, or for providers to restrict ApplePay use to only phones with a fingerprint scanner (and depending on how the tech works, I'm not sure if that's possible). In both situations, iPhone 8 owners largely lose the use of ApplePay, which will drive down iPhone 8 demand and hit Apple where it hurts most, their wallet.I disagree entirely. Yes, the financial companies may not be happy until facial recognition is a proven technology but they won't pull-out entirely, more likely to say "passcode only on those new phones" and throw the ball back into Apple's court until they either sort out TouchID or demonstrate the security of their facial recognition implementation.
Don't forget they still have to support 7s/7s+ buyers.
It goes without saying, faces are much more complex than fingerprints. Also, fingerprints have been used throughout history to identify people. It's entirely possible that they could have created a completely reliable facial recognition software, but I have a hard time believing companies will back the tech (especially in the beginning). Lastly, I hate to play into your "it's faster to type in a password" argument, but scanning your face when making an in-store person does seem very cumbersome and awkward...
True, which means for now we can only go off of the current tech available today, which I don't think anyone would argue even comes close to TouchIDs reliability. Also, there are many things that can change the way you look on a day-to-day basis (i.e. glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). Faces are much more complex than fingerprints, which are just two-dimensional images that largely remain the same your entire life.Hard to say that something that hasn't been released yet is less reliable. They have been working on this for years, maybe it works better than touch ID?
Samsung Pay can use the Iris scanner. If banks are ok with that. I'm pretty sure they're going to be ok with what Apple puts out. Apple isn't some fly by night company. Apple Pay if I remember correctly forces you to put a pin code on your phone. That's still better than using a regular bank card that you might lose and person can swipe as credit and clean you out before you realize that your card is missing. Cashiers hardly ever ask for IDIt's not the removing of TouchID that's the issue, it's the replacement of it with a less reliable biometric scanner. If companies aren't comfortable with facial scanners, and there's no way for them to ensure that you can only use a passcode as a method of verification, they will pull out completely.
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?You have absolutely no clue how the technology you’re talking about works and it seems like you’d rather keep your eyes closed than even look at the details supplied in this leak...
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?
Faces are MUCH more complex than two-dimensional images of a fingerprint, and like I said before there are factors that change the way you look daily (glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). We as humans have trouble recognizing people who go from full bearded to completely shaven overnight, you think a computer is going to see through that?
Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!But think of this. In that case, there is no way for financial companies to restrict these phones to only using passcodes. The only solution (until facial recognition is proven) would be for Apple themselves to disable biometrics as a verification method for ApplePay in the iPhone 8, or for providers to restrict ApplePay use to only phones with a fingerprint scanner (and depending on how the tech works, I'm not sure if that's possible). In both situations, iPhone 8 owners largely lose the use of ApplePay, which will drive down iPhone 8 demand and hit Apple where it hurts most, their wallet.
And you do?! Do you secretly work for Apple?
Faces are MUCH more complex than two-dimensional images of a fingerprint, and like I said before there are factors that change the way you look daily (glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). We as humans have trouble recognizing people who go from full bearded to completely shaven overnight, you think a computer is going to see through that?
True, which means for now we can only go off of the current tech available today, which I don't think anyone would argue even comes close to TouchIDs reliability. Also, there are many things that can change the way you look on a day-to-day basis (i.e. glasses, hairstyling/haircut, shaving/growing a beard, makeup, lighting, etc.). Faces are much more complex than fingerprints, which are just two-dimensional images that largely remain the same your entire life.
Let's talk about how ugly that cutout looks at the top of the screen!
Lastly, I hate to play into your "it's faster to type in a password" argument
I was thinking the same thing... you're in a crowded place, sitting at a table or bar, attention is elsewhere or in a conversation, someone could angle your phone at you without you noticing at lot easier than they could grab your hand...Weird question - Say the facial detection is a near instantaneous thing.... What is preventing somebody from grabbing your phone and holding it up to your face to unlock it. Not to sound crazy but that is much easier than grabbing somebody's hand and forcing their finger onto the home button, and I can actually see it being a problem.
It's less I fail to consider their achievement, and more that I've lost faith in them. You're right, I'm not an engineer and don't know exactly how it works, but they sure as **** haven't been instilling confidence in the last few releases.Well, if you look into Apple's investments into technology for the last few years, which includes camera processing, AR development, 3D camera input, AI development *specifically* for facial recognition: I'd say that they've got a better foundation than you're giving them credit for... and mainly from your posts I'd say it is because these topics are outside of your skillset or knowledgebase. You're just offshotting things that could go wrong without much credible point other than what if.
You also fail to consider the level that Apple must have achieved to felt confident to remove Touch ID from their flagship with something like this, new and/or horribly implemented prior, as a replacement.
The power button has been made longer for reach ability.
Sony tried and it sucks.
And that's my biggest issue with it all. I'm not against facial recognition, I think it's the tech of the future. I just don't believe we're there yet. In conjunction with TouchID, facial recognition is great. But let's be honest, what's happening here is Apple failed to implement TouchID under the display and is trying to find another way to bring a fullscreen iPhone to market.Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!
It's not beyond the realms of possibility for Apple to screw a model up. It's a first generation product, a next-generation iPhone, compromises are to be expected and of course even if the worse came to the worse and ApplePay was restricted to a passcode for now Apple would simply point you to a 7s/7s+ if you found the situation unacceptable. Hell, maybe that's why they're keeping those models around until the iPhone 8 is sorted out. Think of this years model as a sneek-peek into the future.
Yes and no. I think all of these things run various iterations of iOS so it's not the weird. Sloppy coding (lack of cleanup) is essentially what leads us here.Anyone else find it odd that homepod software contains so much data about an unreleased upcoming iPhone? Seems really weird to me... This is either a deliberate Apple controlled leak or something weird is going on. Perhaps some misdirection?
To be fair they have to release something with an edge-to-edge OLED screen or they're going to look old-fashioned next to the competition; people really are that guidable and finicky and will buy on looks alone.To now discover they are getting rid of TouchID on the 8, it feels more like damage control than confidence in their new tech. I whole-heartedly believe Apple spent 3 years trying to implement TouchID under the display and they couldn't do it. Now they're playing catch up..
My main concern is anyone being able to point my phone at my face and unlock it from there. Mind you, the concern isn't astronomically high, but I can see privacy issues arise from this. Plus, how easy would it be for a police officer to just point your phone at your face and get whatever they want off your phone in the spot? Again, not a huge concern of mine, but curious how it is addressed.Well they better have a convincing argument about the validity/security of 3D facial recognition then!
It's not beyond the realms of possibility for Apple to screw a model up. It's a first generation product, a next-generation iPhone, compromises are to be expected and of course even if the worse came to the worse and ApplePay was restricted to a passcode for now Apple would simply point you to a 7s/7s+ if you found the situation unacceptable. Hell, maybe that's why they're keeping those models around until the iPhone 8 is sorted out. Think of this years model as a sneek-peek into the future.
And that's my biggest issue with it all. I'm not against facial recognition, I think it's the tech of the future. I just don't believe we're there yet. In conjunction with TouchID, facial recognition is great. But let's be honest, what's happening here is Apple failed to implement TouchID under the display and is trying to find another way to bring a fullscreen iPhone to market.
Isn't Apple's whole remit "solutions for the 90%"? (at least it was under Jobs). There are always going to be scenarios where it "fails" in a given situation. The simple truth is if these concerns are paramount to you then it's simply not the phone for you.My main concern is anyone being able to point my phone at my face and unlock it from there. Mind you, the concern isn't astronomically high, but I can see privacy issues arise from this. Plus, how easy would it be for a police officer to just point your phone at your face and get whatever they want off your phone in the spot? Again, not a huge concern of mine, but curious how it is addressed.