Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Chinese mobile phone company Vivo already have a fingerprint scanner which works under glass or even metal.

And there rumours the Samsung Note 8 will include an under display sensor, which will be announced before the iPhone. So we will wait and see.

The Note 8 has already leaked in full, it has the fingerprint on the back, just like the S8. And whether Vivo have come up with something that works under the display is not really relevant here. The iPhone is going to be produced and sold in the hundred of millions devices, I highly doubt that the Vivo's tech is available in the required quantities and we don't even have a clue about how good it works etc.. And whether they would charge ridiculous fees in order for Apple to license the technology.
 
The annoying thing with them rushing out the new iPhone before they've got under-screen TouchID working is it means TouchID is never coming back, it's a victim to their engineering problems. Apple won't "go backwards" as it'd effectively be admitting to having released an unfinished product and that the face sensor was a compromise instead of a progressive decision. It has to be seen as "courage" or whatever and "you don't need that silly old system where you have to go to the effort of lifting a finger"

I don't like the idea - would rather it unlocks when I take a positive action like putting my finger on it, not when I happen to look at it, and presumably only if you look at it in exactly the right way. Currently, can see myself keeping the iPhone SE going as long as possible - if only for the sake of the Apple Watch - and then eventually seeing if there's been any progress on making Android work as nicely (manufacturer-independent updates, a backup system without compromises, etc) as sadly Apple seem to have lost the plot.

What do you do if you have a burqa? I know it's a controversial thing but Apple are known for leftie kind of views which would tend to be against discriminating against religious groups.

If they remove completely touchID from this year's iPhone it won't come back, I agree on that.
Let's see how face recognition will work, I don't think Apple will release something half baked, if they remove touchID faceID will work at least as good as the fingerprint.
My main concern is sunglasses and scarfs during winter, I don't think they really care about women with burqa and using the pin will always be an option.
I'm curious about the home button. With iPhone 7 they got rid of the actual button but you can still press there, have a feedback and get home. I guess they'll use 3D touch or have some kind of toolbar at the bottom of the screen with home and other function buttons, I think that will be the only real surprise during the keynote.

Anyway I'm not sure I'll buy iPhone 8 or whatever they're calling it. I'm afraid the price will be too high so I may go for the 7s or 7s+ instead, and those models will have touchID as usual so I'll have another couple of years before worrying about the lack of fingerprint sensor
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoveToMacRumors
If FaceID is going to be so streamlined and non-intrusive as many people are hoping/suggesting (rather than press a button, hold up in front of face), then how do we think it's going to be prevented from activating all the time? If I have my phone on my desk next to me, I don't want it unlocking every time my face enters the (presumably wide-angle) IR zone. But if I've got to press a button to even activate FaceID scanning, then that's a big step back to the single-step Touch ID unlock.

Or maybe Apple will have us set up 'unlock faces' to prevent accidental unlocking; left eye closed, tongue touching nose and wiggling right ear. Come to think of it, does anyone remember this picture from one of Apples patents from several years ago? It all makes sense now!
FaceID.JPG


Incidentally, wouldn't it be good if the Apple patent artists and the Apple emoji artists did a job-swap for a while?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: trellus and jermwhl
I'm gonna laugh when WWDR yanks his developer access. There's no way to describe how mad marketing about this is right now.

You realize that you didn't need to be a developer to access this firmware. It was pushed out publicly by Apple last week as 'AudioAccessory 1,1" (for HomePod) in error. Strangely it was still available after all of these tidbits were being discovered and spoken about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aylk and jermwhl
What if this is just a modified version of iOS 11 that is more custom tailored to the homepod?! If the device doesn't have need for touchID it would not have it in the code.
Apple has put too much into the touchID to just discard it.

Maybe this is their way of hiding it in plain sight.
I thought the same.
I mean why they need to write a line of code that point out touchID is underneath the display. They just can use the same “TouchID” word and no one gonna notice that underneath the display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darth.sham
As much as I absolutely love love love Touch ID and loved the headphone jack, these are 2 things that I have learned and will learn to live without.

As others have said, you can bet that Apple's facial recognition will be superb.

And to everyone saying "what about sunglasses, scarves, hijabs etc." I'm sure they figured it out. In regards to Touch ID, what about dry scaly fingers, gloves, wet/sweaty or cold hands? Exactly.

And don't forget there's always a passcode option...
[doublepost=1501580114][/doublepost]
Passcode. TouchID wasn't all inclusive either. My father's fingertips are burnt away from working as a chef. My grandfather was a wood worker and he couldn't get TouchID to work on his iPad (from wear on fingerprints, but he's also missing a few fingers).

Thank you. Exactly what I just posted. This is not the end all be all and for the love of God I hope people stop saying that Pay requires Touch ID becauseeee it doesn't.
[doublepost=1501580299][/doublepost]
What if this is just a modified version of iOS 11 that is more custom tailored to the homepod?! If the device doesn't have need for touchID it would not have it in the code.
Apple has put too much into the touchID to just discard it.

Maybe this is their way of hiding it in plain sight.

What does HomePod have to do with facial recognition? Why would that be in the code? I guarantee that Face ID and the other features of the iPhone will be so major that people won't miss Touch ID. Just watch...
 
  • Like
Reactions: darth.sham
So the volume buttons, the home / touch id button are all going to be the same button?

No?

I said the lock button was growing to the size of the two volume buttons, ie getting longer. I never said it was replacing them.

Look at the leaked images. Volume buttons on one side, elongated "lock" button on the other which could easily house touch id.
 
TouchID is just a more convenient way to unlock the phone, there is denial on that. I know how good OLED looks (I have a LG OLED), but that's 55 inch. There is now way a bezelless 5.8 inch OLED iPhone justifies a price tag which is 2/3 of my TV.

I'm pretty much in the same boat, I do like the smaller iPhone with larger screen, but $1000, hell no!!!
Actually $1000 is affordable in the USA, but you have to realize that in EU and other parts of the world this equals €1300 = $1500...

Lool you keep throwing up a price tag the phone is not revealed we don’t know **** about the price.

The iPhone 7 Plus 256gb is £969 so that’s over $1000 already lool

I doubt this iPhone will be £1000 base model price. I’m guessing it will have 3 models based on the usual storage capacities an the 128gb version which I’ll be getting will probably cost £699 that’s my estimation. And I’m fine with that. £799 max price I’m betting for 128gb iPhone.
 
No?

I said the lock button was growing to the size of the two volume buttons, ie getting longer. I never said it was replacing them.

Look at the leaked images. Volume buttons on one side, elongated "lock" button on the other which could easily house touch id.

So the on / off button is going back to the top?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
I just can't see how "faceID" would ever work as well as TouchID for Apple Pay. I now use apple Pay more than I ever use my contactless bank cards. Food & drink purchases during the day, payg on the tube, fuel... I can't get my head around how it work logistically.. So I would now place the phone on top of the rf reader/terminal and then lean over it so I'm looking down at it (or where most shops have them at hip/desk level) lean down so my face is in line with the device? its just bonkers... TouchID and the fingerprint technology underpins the confidence for banks to allow use of their payment cards with Apple Pay.. I know I work for one. They'll take a zero risk approach and not trust face Id is as secure as Touch ID until its tested and proven by themselves. This will likely mean a lot of banks not supporting apple pay from Day 1 on the new iPhone until they are convinced around the security framework it provides.
 
I just can't see how "faceID" would ever work as well as TouchID for Apple Pay. I now use apple Pay more than I ever use my contactless bank cards. Food & drink purchases during the day, payg on the tube, fuel...
Same here.

These days I leave home with my keys and my phone.
That is it.
Wallet languishes in my desk drawer.

If this face recognition thing does not work 101% and retailers get jittery about ApplePay or gets withdrawn I will be seriously pissed off at Apple.

I trust Apple have done their job… so… let's see. o_O
[doublepost=1501582017][/doublepost]
Facial recognition has already proven to be unreliable. Without Touch ID there is no Apple Pay.
I have the same fear.
Fingers crossed…
 
I just can't see how "faceID" would ever work as well as TouchID for Apple Pay. I now use apple Pay more than I ever use my contactless bank cards. Food & drink purchases during the day, payg on the tube, fuel... I can't get my head around how it work logistically.. So I would now place the phone on top of the rf reader/terminal and then lean over it so I'm looking down at it (or where most shops have them at hip/desk level) lean down so my face is in line with the device? its just bonkers... TouchID and the fingerprint technology underpins the confidence for banks to allow use of their payment cards with Apple Pay.. I know I work for one. They'll take a zero risk approach and not trust face Id is as secure as Touch ID until its tested and proven by themselves. This will likely mean a lot of banks not supporting apple pay from Day 1 on the new iPhone until they are convinced around the security framework it provides.

I use Apple pay solely with my Apple Watch. I enter the pin in the morning and that's it, as long as I keep the Watch on my wrist I'm able to pay.
If banks accepted Apple Watch why wouldn't they accept face ID, if it works correctly?

I think the use case will change, you'll have to bring up Wallet by looking directly at the phone so your face is recognised, then you have X seconds to get to the terminal and pay.
 
Facial recognition has already proven to be unreliable. Without Touch ID there is no Apple Pay.

Which is the reason I find this even more absurd.. for their new flagship phone to not include Apple Pay (the most dominant mobile payment tech on the market) just doesn't sit right with me. They've invested significantly to drop it all together there.

what I fear is that there will be a compromise, touch ID on the rear or elsewhere which again ergonomically ruins the experience.
 
I use Apple pay solely with my Apple Watch. I enter the pin in the morning and that's it, as long as I keep the Watch on my wrist I'm able to pay.
If banks accepted Apple Watch why wouldn't they accept face ID, if it works correctly?

I think the use case will change, you'll have to bring up Wallet by looking directly at the phone so your face is recognised, then you have X seconds to get to the terminal and pay.

works if you have a watch (probably the master plan to increase their sales? :D)

A change of UX would be on the cards yes, but the way you describe it just slows it all down. at the moment the software knows if the phone is near the RF reader and flips to the wallet and detects your fingerprint without me having to do anything apart from resting my finger on the home button.

If i now need to stare at my phone to unlock it, click to go the wallet, stare at my phone to authorise my payment and then place the devise on the terminal.. thats just rubbish.

I already get grief from commuters behind me on the tube for using Touch ID for payment as it is slower than traditional contactless cards (oyster or bank card).
 
  • Like
Reactions: trellus
It was actually, it made me move away from those stupid wires. Moving to Bluetooth headphones was a needed decision.

You didn't move to wireless headphones before the iPhone 7, which suggests that wireless was not a priority to you.
However, with the iPhone 7 they tricked you to spend even more money on wireless headphones, and you consider this as an achievement without realizing that you could have purchase wireless headphones waaaay before the release of the iPhone 7.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.