Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It just occurred to me though that *maybe* we’ve been looking at this backwards. Could be that keeping TouchID was the backup plan for Apple, in case FaceID couldn’t be made to work well enough. And dropping TouchID has more to do with FaceID being a success than with problems adding TouchID to the iPhone 8. Maybe.
That's the type of original thinking we need more of around here. People give Apple so little credit when it comes to making changes to a product. I'm sure Apple prototyped ever conceivable configuration/combination/location of Facial recognition and Touch ID and came to the conclusion that facial recognition is the way to go. Do you really think someone said "Ah, Mr Cook TouchID is tricky under the screen", "Hey, don't worry about it just throw on facial recognition, it's all good!".
And for those who insist on moaning, hey no-ones forcing you to buy it. Perhaps the iPhone's no-longer for you.
 
I'm still not convinced that no TouchID is a forwards step...... but is it possible that FaceID could be implemented in a way that means that it works in place of TouchID as in, all current apps that use TouchID could just use FaceID without any developer work. (It just works) That's the only way I can see the benefit. Assuming FaceID actually works as well as it should.
 
Great. Now all the cops have to do to get into my phone is grab it and unlock it with my face. At least Touch ID required more cooperation and 10 finger options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: big-ted
Great. Now all the cops have to do to get into my phone is grab it and unlock it with my face. At least Touch ID required more cooperation and 10 finger options.

Yup. It's a DREAM for all governments and regimes worldwide.

Automatic face scanning is quite literally the main horror in all dystopian literature. And here it is becoming actual mainstream reality and people are cheering it.

Philip K. Dick is lucky enough to not experience his scariest fantasies coming to life.
 
Last edited:
Let me just say this again.

All one needs to do to unlock your phone is grab your phone point it quickly towards your face and unlock it. My nephew did that to me today and ran off with my phone.

So when your asleep anyone can get in your phone by hovering it less than a second near your face without you ever feeling a thing.

NO TOUCHID = NO SALE
 
  • Like
Reactions: RipsMctits
but is it possible that FaceID could be implemented in a way that means that it works in place of TouchID as in, all current apps that use TouchID could just use FaceID without any developer work. (It just works)
That's exactly how it works. When an app requests validation from TouchID it knows nothing about your fingerprints, it's simply waiting for a "yes" or "no". The fingerprint scanner compares the image of your fingerprint on the sensor to the fingerprint images stored in the secure enclave on your phone. If it's a match it says "yes" and authorization goes through, if not then it returns a "no".

Now replace the word "fingerprint" with "face" in the above example and that's how FaceID will work.

Apps will not need to be re-written one bit, they'll still request authentication and sit there waiting for "yay" or "nay".
 
Last edited:
Really hope this isn't replacing Touch ID and is being introduced alongside as an alternative
Why are so many people worried ?
Before removing Touch ID, Apple will obviously do an engineering study to see if this is an equal or better alternative in terms of usability and security, and if not, how to make it equal or better.
 
This seems like a nice feature. My concern would be, what if someone picks my charging phone up off the table while I’m asleep and put its in front of my face to unlock it. At least with TouchID, they would have to grab my hand and chances are, I would wake up to notice it.

Just a random thought...definitely first world problems.

That can easily be sorted. Like your eyes must be open for it to work.

It fastanates me people here coming up with some concerns (not necessarily you) as thought Apples engenieers have not thought over and over thousands of possible scenarios.
 
That's exactly how it works. When an app requests validation from TouchID it knows nothing about your fingerprints, it's simply waiting for a "yes" or "no". The fingerprint scanner compares the image of your fingerprint on the sensor to the fingerprint images stored in the secure enclave on your phone. If it's a match it say "yes" and authorization goes through, if not the it returns a "no".

Now replace the word "fingerprint" with "face" in the above example and that's how FaceID will work.

Apps will not need to be re-written one bit, they'll still request authentication and sit there waiting for "yay" or "nay".

This makes sense and I feel better about the Touch ID removal. Apple just HAS to get facial detection bang on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
Let me just say this again.

All one needs to do to unlock your phone is grab your phone point it quickly towards your face and unlock it. My nephew did that to me today and ran off with my phone.

So when your asleep anyone can get in your phone by hovering it less than a second near your face without you ever feeling a thing.

NO TOUCHID = NO SALE


Tell me how different is when someone scans your face while you’re sleeping or use your finger at the same conditions? I’ve seen a lot cases when people put the finger of someone sleeping to unlock their iPhone. Anyway, you can restar your phone before going to sleep, this disables Touch ID (and probably Face ID) until you type the passcode again.
 
Apple is soaking this all in. This is a highly Clever way for them to leak iPhone 8 information and keep the HomePod relevant in the news. It's marketing at their finest and this is what they are so good at. It's Building hype and excitement all before the launch in approximately a month. I give them credit and this no is an accident with all this leaked information. Well played Apple.

Sorry, but I just don't buy all this "deliberate leaks" stuff. Putting aside the fact that many people just can't seem to accept that people do mess up, there's the one big question... why didn't Apple just formally announce this if they wanted to stir up hype? You could maybe say that they want to keep the formal announcements for the Keynote as the magic and surprise of Keynotes are an important part of the Apple 'aura' - but if you subscribe to that, what do you think these leaks have now done for September's Keynote?

The only places these leaks are being talked about is on techie sites like this - the one part of Apple's demographic that doesn't need whipping into a frenzy - we all know that there's a new iPhone coming and it'll be announced at Apple's Keynote next month, I don't see these leaks influencing any of 'our' buying decisions in a way that the Keynote wouldn't have anyway. Apple's big target demographic isn't the non-Apple diehards, it's the average man or woman who's maybe thinking of changing his phone in the next couple of months. This person is not going to even be aware of some iOS firmware code leaks, never mind being hyped/influenced by them.

Then there's the Keynote itself - it's only about a month away. Do you really think Tim Cook & Co are going to feel good about getting up on stage and trying to surprise us with the 'magic' that they know damn well everyone in the audience and online has known about for the last few weeks. Apple's reputation for secrecy and surprise is one of the company's USPs, and while it's not going to lead to any overnight plummeting in the share price, the fact that they've subjected themselves to such a massive leak can only harm that magic in the long run. You really think they'd leak everything?

All these people saying that Apple have done this deliberately as 'hype=good' need to put a bit more substance into that to make it stand up to any scrutiny. And blindly saying that "you can't explain Apple's reasons because they're just too clever", I'm afraid you'll need to give a bit more detail than that to convince me this isn't anything more that appears at face value - a monumental cock-up by someone.
 
The only way I imagine this being viable is if the iPhone is constantly verifying your face; the phone will lock or not allow Apple Pay as soon as it detects an unrecognized face in front of it. It just isn’t physically possible that a flat camera can scan a face that isn’t in its field of view, i.e. when the phone is on the table and I want to unlock it without sticking my face over it.
[doublepost=1502048902][/doublepost]
Tell me how different is when someone scans your face while you’re sleeping or use your finger at the same conditions? I’ve seen a lot cases when people put the finger of someone sleeping to unlock their iPhone. Anyway, you can restar your phone before going to sleep, this disables Touch ID (and probably Face ID) until you type the passcode again.

How can you not see the difference in those situations? I can point a phone at your face from a distance without touching you at all; I can’t scan your fingertip without grabbing and moving your hand.
 
When it comes to TouchID: maybe they are integrating the home and power button into one and it'll be on the side, seamless as ever.

As for the face scanning: it's a nice option but I'd rather continue using my fingerprint.
 
I also suspect that FaceID won’t be a background thing, and will need a (virtual) home button press for it to trigger. If so (and if it works properly) that would make it feel indistinguishable from TouchID. Or even better than TouchID, if you have wet hands etc.

Buy what if your face is wet & shiny? Or covered with shaving cream? Or you have a birthday cake on your face?

:D
 
Gee man, I can't wait to see how the device reacts to that mob of nearly identically capped youtube freaks preparing to hack (or bend, blend, bury, drop) it...
Maybe they can all have the same faceID (seems the same breed anyway...)
 
Last edited:
This seems like a nice feature. My concern would be, what if someone picks my charging phone up off the table while I’m asleep and put its in front of my face to unlock it. At least with TouchID, they would have to grab my hand and chances are, I would wake up to notice it.

Just a random thought...definitely first world problems.

Valid concern. I can see a rise in break-ups and divorces :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.