Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because it is an obsession with apple. For years they didn't even allow you to remove stock apps from your list of apps on your phone. You still can't change the default apps on iOS... you've been able to do this on every other mobile or non mobile OS for absolutely any piece of software since forever, but not on iOS, but have to have mail and safari set as default.

I really think it just puts more people off when you try to force people to use something, that strategy just doesn't work. It's failed for other companies... just look when xbox tried to force people into using kinect when the xbox one first came out. Yeah that worked well.
That seems like a business decision. Not a clinical "obsession". I suppose Apple's business decision could fail (some of them have), but if you're saying that Apple's default apps decision is a failure, reality disagrees with you so far.
 
I expect that the HomePod will have much higher quality sound than the competition. It will be great if Apple has brought top tier audio technology to the $350 price point!
 
I look forward to reading the reviews and owners comments on this. I had wanted one but it didn’t come out in time for Christmas and meanwhile my husband filled the house with Echos and our two free Google Home minis arrived. It’s hard to beat Alexa for verbal control over our music library.

Wow, that marketing blurb is so deja-vu inducing. I think Phil or someone else at Apple wrote a template for product release announcements and they just fill in the blanks at this point.

I loved Siri once a long time ago. But she doesn’t hear me well any more and doesn’t give me enough time to complete text dictation or commands. It’s like talking to someone who doesn’t really want to listen to you but can’t wait to interrupt to tell you about their day. So I’m extremely eager and curious to find out from Mac Rumors how well Siri works on a device that I hope has been designed from the ground up to take in voice input.
 
Good thinking. Probably do that.

Isn't that the case with any Apple product though haha. You think "why would I need something like that or I've gone this long without it why do I need one or a new one" then a week later you wonder how you ever lived without it.

Exactly. I remember when the first iPod and iPhone were released, and then subsequently trashed. Too little, too late, too expensive, buh blah, buh blah, buh blah. And here we are...
 
I have questions....

1. Will it tie in to an AppleTV, such that I can watch a movie and have the sound come through the HomePod? and will that be wired, or WiFi?

2. Will we be able to Airplay from our phones, to listen to Pandora, Spotify, and the like?

3. Will it support multiple voices for families?

4. How will it handle guest voices?
 
I’m kind of skeptical of that... if you have multi-room support, you would have potential buyers attempting to buy two instead of one.

And the Apple crowd would buy 2 of these in a heart beat. You don’t want to give customers a reason to wait... you want to have those features ready to use.

Apple doesn’t seem to focus around giving their products all the features at once.
To me version 1 is to introduce a product, getting it into the hands of the user.
Version two is to look at the customers usage, then refine and introduce a few high desired features with a couple obscure features to plant future concepts.
Third revision bam, what we hoped for in the first release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wide opeN
You can actually snag one for 79 if you time it right, Amazon seems to discount it often and that's the issue I have. I'm happy with my Echo, what does the the HomePod give me that the Echo doesn't? Especially given the exorbitant pricing

better sound quality i bet
 
For those who are comparing it to the Amazon thing - try listening to the two side by side. It's like comparing a AM radio with a decent speaker!
It's a bit like saying "Why is that Ferrari so expensive when I can buy a mainstream Ford Focus cheaper". The Amazon is cheap, nasty with poor quality components. It'll end up in landfills very soon!
Enough said guys!
Have you listened to them side by side?
 
  • Like
Reactions: coffeemadmanUK
For those who are comparing it to the Amazon thing - try listening to the two side by side. It's like comparing a AM radio with a decent speaker!
It's a bit like saying "Why is that Ferrari so expensive when I can buy a mainstream Ford Focus cheaper". The Amazon is cheap, nasty with poor quality components. It'll end up in landfills very soon!
Enough said guys!

So you already have one such that you can speak so factually about the quality of sound superiority?

Otherwise, you are just spinning anything & everything to help Apple sell this product (and they really don't need people like us working so hard for free to help them sell their products). So far, all we know is Apple Marketing saying it has superior sound... + hand-picked (say nice things or no more invites to Apple events) guests getting a few minutes to hear these in an Apple-controlled environment playing Apple-selected content.

If this is a Ferrari at $349, what car analogy fits speakers at 2X, 3X, 10X as much? Let me guess, ALL other speakers are hereafter inferior, regardless of price, brand, guts, experience & focus. Only this one speaker from Apple is NOT made of "cheap nasty with poor quality component" parts.

At least you are consistent. In every thread, Apple's offering is perfection in every way- all competing options are inferior junk. Apparently here- before you've even had a chance to hear or use one of these- it's already crowned the King.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coffeemadmanUK
It can be simulated but you need two speakers for true stereo. Even Apple are saying that.
According to Apple's site, you need 2 for stereo sound (and that's only available later this year as already mentioned)

Looks like we have our definitions of stereo crossed. I consider stereo as two tracks on the audio file, but it seems others are interpreting it as those two tracks coming from different locations.

I guess the reason I see it the way I do, is when I was growing up, this was a stereo, and it's technically two tracks coming from one source.

s-l300.jpg
 
I'd like to own one because of how awesome the sound everyone has said it has. However I simple refuse if it doesn't support spotify.
It’s a streaming speaker. You have an iPhone with Spotify that can stream to the speaker. Problem solved.
 
Since you can use your phone with "hey siri" and that can change your music, etc., and you can use any Bluetooth speaker with your phone (from bad sound quality to good), I'm kind of missing the point of this.
 
I like the fact that it can be used with phone calls as well, I wonder what stock will be like I’m assuming Apple have only made a few in order to test the waters and see what sales are like.
 
Looks like we have our definitions of stereo crossed. I consider stereo as two tracks on the audio file, but it seems others are interpreting it as those two tracks coming from different locations.

I guess the reason I see it the way I do, is when I was growing up, this was a stereo, and it's technically two tracks coming from one source.

s-l300.jpg
Technically, each track is coming from a separate speaker - aka stereo.
 
Apple doesn’t seem to focus around giving their products all the features at once.
To me version 1 is to introduce a product, getting it into the hands of the user.
Version two is to look at the customers usage, then refine and introduce a few high desired features with a couple obscure features to plant future concepts.
Third revision bam, what we hoped for in the first release.

Wait a min... they sold us on this feature when it was first announced. It’s not as if this is a feature Apple is holding off to version two.

Even though I’m not in the market to buy one... I’m disappointed in the omission by Apple. If they delayed it for the Holidays at least make it “ready” when released. Instead delay it for the holiday season and when released, let’s make customers wait for a highly sought after feature.

Not a good way to start off the New Year.
 
For me, this is more of a competitor to Sonos than Echo as Sonos also emphasises the quality of its sound. I've got a lot of Sonos devices (several Play:1 pairs, a Sonos:5, Sonos:3 and a soundbar) and they sound absolutely fantastic (particularly when playing FLAC files).

The HomePod is going to have to be a seriously good bit of kit for me to consider junking my $2K+ investment in Sonos and it's also going to have to support multi-room, stereo pairing and FLAC (or ALAC) files from a local network share to have feature parity on the audio side. Because of this, I'll wait until later in the year when the software for the first 2 has been released and maybe take a look then
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wide opeN and logib
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.