Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

How many of you don't have a Twitter or Facebook?

  • I have neither

    Votes: 63 40.9%
  • I have both

    Votes: 41 26.6%
  • I have Twitter

    Votes: 23 14.9%
  • I have Facebook

    Votes: 27 17.5%

  • Total voters
    154
I have Facebook. I've found it to be a useful tool in staying in touch with family/friends across the country. It's also a good outlet for immediate news updates, sports updates, things of that nature. Lately though I've found it to be increasingly...annoying. People spamming my newsfeed with "multi level marketing" garbage (Thrive, Isagenix, Herbalife, etc). People sharing clickbait and other garbage links and fake articles. My feed has become about half useful/half garbage. Maybe I just need to go through and start thinning out the people and brands that I follow.

I have a Twitter but never use it. Very few of my friends/family have it, and those that do have it don't use it (they use FB as it is far more functional).

I have Instagram and I'm starting to use that more and more. It's obviously good to share and view photos in a simple "bare bones" type of format.
Half of my family acts like I don't exist because I'm not on FB. Apparently, a phone call or a text message is too antiquated for some people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratsg
We use FB for a communication tool to manage groups (for example, setup crews for an event, get a headcount/commitment), as a way to share photos and videos to a group (close family and friends), to get news and info (particularly local) with some immediacy, and to get some insight into local offerings (restaurants, concerts, runs).

We also use direct, more intimate modes of communication when that's a better option, be it a text, voice or video call, or something written.

I use a hammer for nails and a wrench for bolts ...
 
I have ONE site where I can comment (this one). Other than that, NO social media at all.

Oh, and get off my damn lawn!

Until relatively recently, this was the only social media site I ventured onto.

Nowadays, I keep an occasional eye on Twitter, too, as it is handy for political sources, and occasional literary stuff.
 
If that's all you got out of my post then you pretty much misunderstood it completely. Here's where I won't insert a snide comment about your background, however.

The poster to whom I replied had some concerns about who would see pictures of him doing things like drinking, getting drunk, etc. My advice was not to do something (or, at the very least, don't post pictures of something) that you don't want people to judge you for. If you feel like you need to hide it from someone, you probably shouldn't do it.

(BTW - not because I'm an American, but getting drunk and posting pictures of yourself as such is, in my opinion, childish and immature, regardless of one's nationality or calendar age.)
 
Never bothered with either and really don't see the point of people that i used to go to school with adding me lol .

Couldnt stand most then so I'm pretty sure much hasnt changed .
 
Facebook wasn't to bad when it first started out, but now it's just full of spam and pointless status updates, not to mention the politics that swamps it around elections.
 
In the end there are mostly just many generalizations and it all really comes down to how different people use it and what they use it for.
 
Surely it depends upon how much real life experience you have? To put it into another context, that of war games on playboxes, if the nearest bomb to you killed five little kids who had alredy been bombed out once previusly, if the nearest sniper bullet missed by less than a yard, and if you were rescued from being hacked to death by a Gurkha patrol, who needs 'pretend" living? Similarly if you spend lots of time happilly helping frail and disabled people, who needs folks who deliberately stunt their mentality in darkened rooms? I no longer have any jobs on offer, but if I did I would look very closely at people who spend hou after hour on blind-alley posting before I hired them.
 
I don't have either. I lost contact with everyone after college so I didn't see the purpose to having either, and removed them both around 2012. Often times I do think about rejoining facebook to see if anyone would remember me, but then I realize I have nothing exciting in my life to share, so I'm better off.
 
I have ONE site where I can comment (this one). Other than that, NO social media at all.

Oh, and get off my damn lawn!
We're in good company:

BuzzAldrinMarsColonies.png

("Buzz Aldrin, Apollo 11 moonwalker, would like a word with you")
 
I am far too old to do happy handsprings around the room - but after seeing these latest posts, I feel liike trying!
 
I have created both accounts to test the waters, and then I ran in the other direction as fast as my legs could go. :)
 
If that's all you got out of my post then you pretty much misunderstood it completely. Here's where I won't insert a snide comment about your background, however.

The poster to whom I replied had some concerns about who would see pictures of him doing things like drinking, getting drunk, etc. My advice was not to do something (or, at the very least, don't post pictures of something) that you don't want people to judge you for. If you feel like you need to hide it from someone, you probably shouldn't do it.

(BTW - not because I'm an American, but getting drunk and posting pictures of yourself as such is, in my opinion, childish and immature, regardless of one's nationality or calendar age.)

Yes, but the poster to whom you replied @Apple fanboy - made the valid point that when he was 18 (and drinking and getting drunk legally), it was almost unheard of to take photographs of yourself - or have photographs taken - unless it was at a party. That was something that his generation, and mine, rarely had to even think of.

I remember once taking my lovely Pentax camera to the pub, merely to take a few photographs of some friends and myself, before we had too much to drink - this was the early nineties - because I had so few pictures of them. Likewise, I took it onto the university campus a few times, just to snap a few 'ordinary' pictures, of day to day activity.

These days, obviously, it is very different, but some of it does come down to how you define your personal boundaries, and whether, merely because you are in a public space (such as a pub) you can be viewed (by others and yourself) as something to be 'consumed' on social media, or whether you see your life in terms of something which should be lived in the public space, hence 'selfless' and so on.
 
I have neither.

I don't have time to post pix of my kid and contrary to popular opinion, people don't care when I'm taking a dump.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.