This really confuses the smartphone market 
How will Samsung know which one to copy?
How will Samsung know which one to copy?
And yet, ironically, they look nothing alike. Funny eh?Sorry sir but you are mistaken. The copying actually began by HTC in full force in Mach 2013 When they released the HTC One (M7)
![]()
A full 6 months after the iPhone 5 was released in Sept. 2012
![]()
Sorry sir but you are mistaken. The copying actually began by HTC in full force in Mach 2013 When they released the HTC One (M7)
A full 6 months after the iPhone 5 was released in Sept. 2012
Your post points to the ridiculousness of this entire thread. (thread ridiculous, not your post) Yes, the iP6 has similarities to the iPod. But it's undeniable that it also has similarities to the M7. It's equally undeniable the A9 has similarities to iP6. Point is, contrary to some hyperbole in this thread, companies are inspired by other companies all the time. Hard as it is for some in this forum to believe, not every idea at Apple originates in Cupertino.imo iPhone 6 is a riff on this:
![]()
That iP6 design is ugly enough to be worth nothing. How can you then devalue it?So HTC are the new Samsung.
What is the point of patent laws? This blatant copying of the antenna bands and protruding camera shows that the laws are impotent. Whilst I don't care for the design of the iPhone 6, what it means is that design is devalued. Designers will be deterred from creating brilliance, knowing that if they do, their designs will get ripped off with no penalty.
We can therefore look forward to bland design in the future, all because of the inability of the American courts to carry out justice.
HTC is entirely the reason I switched to Apple. My first smartphone back in 2009 was an HTC Eris. It was the biggest piece of junk one could imagine. Tiny screen, awful bluetooth, lack of internal RAM, super slow processor, you name it. I rooted and overclocked it and it was still extremely slow. After 2 years of suffering I said "no more Android crap" and bought iPhone 4S. Been on iPhones ever since and you can't make me go back.
So should the ones at Apple in all truth.There is inspiration from a current design and then there's straight up copying. Those who work at HTC and did this 'design' should be embarrassed of themselves.
And yet, ironically, they look nothing alike. Funny eh?
Again, the 5 and the M7 look NOTHING alike, if you honestly believe they do, get your eyes checked.Well, the HTC One M7 copying of the iPhone 5 really can't be denied. A full 6 months after the iPhone 5 came out. Especially when you compare the One M7 to the POS design of the HTC One S that they came out with earlier in the year before the iPhone 5:
![]()
This is the crap they were making BEFORE they saw the iPhone 5. Case closed.
To be fair, Android phones have come a long way since then.
Can't be denied?Well, the HTC One M7 copying of the iPhone 5 really can't be denied. A full 6 months after the iPhone 5 came out. Especially when you compare the One M7 to the POS design of the HTC One S that they came out with earlier in the year before the iPhone 5:
![]()
This is the crap they were making BEFORE they saw the iPhone 5. Case closed.
Nope. Samsung used A8 as the name budget phone. It would be hard for HTC to use A9 as a processor name. Same with Apple using Force Touch in a phone. It would be pretty hard since Huawei uses Force Touch in their Mate S phone.Doesn't Apple have a trademark on their A9 processor name? Wouldn't that make it hard for HTC to use 'A9' in a cell phone product name?
Is that around $700 US dollars for you? If so, damn! Lol.