Ha ha, WRONG. Go right in the pictures folder in Leopard and you can view every picture in Icon View all at once and you can zoom the sizes.
Not the same as or as good as Windows for the last 10 years, sorry.
Wanna browse through larger size photos? Set it in Cover Flow view and thumb through all you want.
Extremely slow and inefficient. Plus Coverflow is a gimmick. It's never been useful in iTunes, the iPhone, or in OS X.
Want to view large size photos individually? Select any one pic and hit the space bar and Quicklook will zoom the picture to full size. All these ways of viewing pictures have nothing to do with Preview or iPhoto.
Now why would I do that when I can just double click one picture in Windows and scroll through the entire folder full screen that way?
Get you're facts straight, Windows can't do this.
Yeah, Windows does it better
Are you sure? Or did you just make those numbers up on the spot?...but if you have a source, I'd love to see it!
Go to HP and Dell.com and look through the specs for their systems from the last few years. HP has specs for nearly every system sold in the last decade.
More me with "I" statements, I'm sorry, but one persons experiances aren't "evidence" for any agruement
My 3 MacBooks say that its a fact.
So much personal feelings in your posts! Lovely, but meanless to the debate
Care to explain how 16x10 is better than 16x9? 16x9 is the standard for video, gaming, etc. So don't go on about "personal feelings" when all PC manufacturers and PC display manufacturers are moving towards 16x9 and away from 16x10 completely.
Again personal feelings, please stop presenting it as fact
I have yet to see someone who isn't an Apple Apologist agree that OS X is prettier than Vista.
Source? Because its not like that today!(with Vista) But either way, Apple doesn't cripple its OSes, MS does. I like Apple's way, you can feel free to like MSes way
Apple doesn't cripple OSes? Tell that to the iBook owners who couldn't control their multi-display setups.
Let me know when OS X can run video as good as Windows too
If you want proof of Home Premium and Pro being the only units available to consumers, I suggest you read the news.
Personal story, pretty worthless on such a small scale
Of course you would say that. It's a perfect example of how bad Apple's customer support it.
The burden of proof is upon you!
No, its not. I have both Leopard and Vista. I've presented many arguments across many threads in this forum discussing why Leopard is limited compared to Windows. And all I get are canned responses like yours "prove it". Uh.. I have. It's the Apple Apologist that can't admit the truth.
You wouldn't just believe me, would you? No, you'd want proof, and we want proof that OS X does less then Windows
Like I said, let me know when OS X can play blu-ray movies, modern games, handle multiple displays right, stop wasting CPU cycles.. I can go on you know, but I'm giving you easy ones.
First off, the don't cost nearly 2x equally speced PCs, when you consider the form factors they take(so compare an all-in-one PC to iMac)
Form factors? Please, thats a weak argument. Even then Macs still lose by a huge margin. The Dell Studio XPS 13, for the same price as the entry unibody MacBook, has dual GPUs running in hybrid SLI, twice the RAM, a faster processor, double the HDD space, HDMI, etc.
Also, the form factor argument fails miserably for other reasons.
One being the fact that Apple does NOT give you a choice. If you're a "consumer" and you want a desktop, you have the Mac mini and iMac. Thats it. You have absolutely no choice in what type of system you can buy. So that argument is completely invalid.
Look at the iMac. The cheapest system with a dedicated GPU, and only 256MB mind you, is $1,799.
No right minded person is going to choose that system over a separate tower and screen. First of all, the iMac screen is terrible. It's a mirror. Second, for that price, you can build a system that would mop the floor with the Mac Pro and still have several hundred dollars left over.
The form factor argument fails with notebooks too. Why? Again, choice. Apple doesn't give you a choice of what you can buy. Its either the one thing or nothing at all.
Like I've said hundreds of times, people don't buy the 13.3" MacBook because of its form factor and size, they buy it because its the only Mac they can afford. Apple does not give you a choice at all.
RAM and HDD are easy upgrades(for me, so I'm ok with a PC/Mac that ships with less...if you aren't, thats fine, buy what you like).
Even if you use the failing form factor argument, you still lose. Like I said, the Dell Studio XPS, for the same price as the cheap unibody MacBook, has a faster processor, twice the RAM (DDR3 as well), dual GPUs, twice the HDD space, etc.
Go look at reviews on a large scale, consumer reports...Apple wins their consumer service often. This isn't all about one person
Again, as I've said many times before, Apple's customer service surveys aren't reliable. You have people on this form who have had their systems and components of their systems swapped out/repaired more than half a dozen times and they're still happy with Apple just because it is Apple and not a PC. Apple's customer service ratings are greatly skewed by brand loyalty. PC users have no brand loyalty. If something goes bad on their PC then they're done with that brand no matter what. Yet Apple could punch someone in the gut, kick them in the crotch when they're down, spit on them and laugh at them and that person would still be happy with Apple because its not a Windows PC.
Shocking as it may be, not everyone is looking for the same things you are. This is a time when your wants/needs might be different from others!
Thats why theres more people out there with blu-ray players than Apple TVs or Roku Netflix boxes

Thats why blu-ray is being adopted faster than DVD was.
Starting to ship and standard aren't the same
Nice job cutting out the rest of my post where I talk about how HDMI has been shipping on PC GPUs and notebook PCs for years now, and became the standard years ago.
This is 2009, not 2003 like your post quoted. HDMI has been in PCs for over half a decade now. Time to admit the facts.
Wait, wait.....when someone suggested playing with Finder to fit your wants better, that was bad because it didn't ship like that, these extra worthless programs are fine? Double Standard?
Somebody who took my post out of context completely.
I was talking about monitors and built-in functionality, such as being able to properly set up multiple displays and change sleep settings. That sort of functionality is built into EVERY OS that is NOT Mac OS.
Again personal touch is nice, but consumer reports and other studies aren't backing you up, sorry
Consumer Reports? Oh you mean the publication that no intelligent person pays attention to?
What studies? The ones where Apple Apologists say they love Apple support?
Blanket statements with sources to back them up are fun! And easy!!
Do more reading around this forum and do some googling. You'll find all the proof you need to show that USB card readers are slower than built-in.
Really? Can you point me to software that works as well as iWeb with Apple's MobileMe...because thats what I'm looking for?(if you aren't, thats fine, but don't pretend iWeb alternatives are universally better for all)
MobileMe? No thanks. I don't need to throw away $100 a year on services that are superior elsewhere and free.
Two whole copies of popular software? Oh, no! Could you handle dragging them to the trash can? Certainly no PC has this issue on a much larger scale
Yeah I had to drag them to the trash can and then hunt down all the little plist files left behind in the other various Library folders.
The funny thing is my HPs have only shipped with two pieces of trialware. Norton, which has a complete uninstaller, and Office, which also has a complete uninstaller.
These personal storys are just great! And meaningless for the debate!
Do some googling.
Personal stories stay great! And meaningless for the debate!
Again, do some googling. You'll find thousands with the same experience as me.
This is simply not true, you just are using OS X/Preview incorrectly(if goal through lots of pictures is your goal). Preview is an app where you open the file. To just see the file, click it once, and press the space bar. Then you can move left and right as you please.
Then the file is small and not full screen. In Windows I can just double click the file, it opens in Windows preview app, and I can go through the entire folder IN FULL SCREEN. Wow!
Well here it is...point by point, calling you out on worthless personal stories and pointing out when you missed features of OS X
Actually, all you've done is given me more of the same canned responses as all of the other people. All you do is say "personal experience" despite the fact that hundreds of links on google will back up everything I say.
More with the "me, me, me", enough already!
Again, go google. You'll find that, outside of dedicated Apple fan communities, OS X is quite crash prone.
So blanket statement(Mac run hotter then PCs) followed by one personal example? Wow...thats great, but only proves that one example, nothing else
You should follow the links I've posted in other threads. I personally like this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv38uGj0PhY
But your stating the Bluetooth isn't useful, and multitouch is a gimmick, yet you state the fingerprint readers aren't? C'mon man. Those things are hardly reliable and passwords are far more secure; obvious propaganda.
Fingerprint readers aren't at all about security. They're completely about convenience. Want to log into the OS? Swipe your finger. Log into MacRumors? Swipe your finger. They do store your passwords in encrypted files, so you don't have to worry about that. Like I said, they're about convenience.
Bluetooth, like I said, is unreliable on the Mac. And aside from using a bluetooth keyboard and mouse, what is it good for? Even the iPhone doesn't use Bluetooth file transfers or anything other than using it for a headset.
The touchpad is good for.. what? Flipping photos. Thats about it. I don't use Safari because its too slow and incompatible. Pinching to zoom in and out isn't as fast as just clicking to zoom in and out.
so i can't install the latest driver updates for the 9400m on the windows partition? see there is too much conflicted posts about it runs as its own and others seem to post that it is a diluted experience... can someone please clarify what i can and can't do?
Yes you can install the nvidia driver for the GPU in Windows. First you'll need to uninstall ONLY the display driver, then install the new one.
has anyone used something like this with a unibody macbook and how is the sound quality? does it even output sound?
The built-in speakers are junk compared to PC notebooks, but the headphone out is okay.
yes, dp to hdmi doesn't support sound. solution?
There is none. You have to use a mini-TOSLink to TOSLink adapter if you want digital audio out. Which means an optical cable plus adapter. You can also use a stereo "Y" adapter that is mini-jack to RCA.
Blu-ray is yet another Sony failure, the prices of the players is too high, the disks are too high and the lack of overall industry support will kill it.
Lack of industry support? Are you kidding? Blu-ray has the same support now as DVD did at the same point in its life.
Right now, blu-ray players cost the same as DVD players did when DVD was 2.5-3 years old. Same for the blu-ray discs.
On top of that, blu-ray has TWICE the marketshare now as DVD did when it was the same age.
Overall, blu-ray is being adopted at twice the rate DVD was. It took DVD more than 6 years to gain that magic 51% marketshare. After 2.5-3 years it had 4%. Again, same point for blu-ray right now and it has 8%.
Downloadable video is the future. I don't about quality as much as the ease of getting 20k titles instantly from netflix.
Downloadable video is definitely NOT the future. Not with bandwidth caps becoming regular all over the world, as well as the DRM problems that come with digital distribution.
Let's look at iTunes. If I buy an HD movie on iTunes I can only watch it on an Apple TV, which I don't own, or on my MacBook. If I want to watch it on a bigger screen I need the right adapters and cables or else HDCP kicks in and I can't watch it. I also can't transfer it to disc to watch on another player.
Out of the hundreds of HP business laptops I've worked on, NONE have ever gotten that kind of battery life. How many you owned? 2?
I'll take my own experience plus the experience of thousands over at notebookreview over your word.
Personal anecdote != fact
Again, google. You'll find plenty of people complaining about ken bell as well.
Tracktion, Vegas Video and Reason are three examples of apps that ran on XP that needed paid upgrades to run on Vista. There are many more. Again, you're avoiding reality if you think that all XP software is compatible with Vista.
And how many pieces of software needed paid upgrades to run on OS X coming from OS 9?
But you don't like benchmarks. Or is it you only like them when they support your skewed vision of reality? If you like benchmarks, you'd see that Vista, even SP1, gets floored by XP, 7, and Ubuntu quite handily.
And what benchmarks would those be? More by ZDNet where they don't even list system specs?
There you go, broad generalization again. Not all laptops ship with HDMI, particularly business models. And not all decent displays from the last 3 years have HDMI, you're making stuff up again. Your precious HP still made tons of high line monitors without HDMI as of just a few months ago.
Nobody buys HP monitors
Show me some laptops that don't have HDMI please. Nearly all Dell and HP models ship with HDMI, or at least have it as an option.
And yes, ALL decent displays in the last 3 years have had HDMI. If you had one without HDMI, then you bought a piece of junk. Simple.