I know it's useless to argue with you, but please explain how the start menu is easier than this - I'd say it's about the same:
The problem is you have to actually make the stack. It's not like that out of the box in OS X.
I couldn't find anything that could match the MacBook Pro in those characteristics. Windows based laptops at that time were generally 3kg (without power adaptor), 2.5 inches thick
2.5 inches thick 2.5 years ago? I don't think so. PC notebooks have been averaging about 1.5" thick for a few years now.
2.5 hours of battery life
All of the HPs I've had in the last 3 years have gotten 3-3.5 hours of battery life. Which is the same real world battery life as the MacBook and MacBook Pro, seeing as how you have to have the screen set to 50% brightness on the Mac to get it to be usable.
I was also happy with the screen resolution of the MacBook Pro as it was a lot higher than those found on Windows based laptops.
Not in the same price range. 2.5-3 years ago, $1,000 15.4" PCs had 1280x800, but above that they had already moved on to 1680x1050.
Now you'd be hard pressed to find a $1299 15.4" system that doesn't sport 1680x1050. Some cheaper 16" systems sport 1366x768, but thats better than the MacBook Pro because its actually a 16x9 aspect ratio and not 16x10.
Aero defaults to the butt ugly basic theme if a program is incompatible with the Aero interface. I thought interface consistency was at the forefront of Aero? On an unrelated note starting up CardSpace always disables Aero so it ends up using the butt ugly basic theme.
Who uses CardSpace?
Besides, even Vista Basic still looks better than the depressing grey of OS X.
By the way, how much will it cost for someone to buy the "full" version of Windows 7? When I mean "full" I mean the "ultimate" or "extreme" version that will be available.
Only Home Premium and Pro will be available to consumers. Ultimate and the other versions will only be available to specific customers.
An OEM copy of Home Premium should run around $100 the same as it has for XP, Windows 98, Vista, etc.
When you compare hardware you are essentially comparing the least important part of the computer.
I'm sorry but that couldn't be any further from the truth. If hardware is the least important part, then try running iMovie on an old Celeron 566.
Sure it's nice to have a well designed computer with excellent hardware (guaranteed with every Mac)
Thats why it took 2 replacements after 8 trips out for repair for me to finally get a problem free Mac.
But if software was efficiently coded, like it was in the old days, we wouldn't need $500 graphics cards to play games
You don't need $500 GPUs to play games. Those are just high end products for the people who want the best. Cheaper GPUs that cost around $200 can play any game at high settings and will be able to for at least a couple of years to come.
He's claims that OS X is limited compared to Windows don't seem to have a backing, he just says it, and acts as though it is true.
I have yet to see anyone prove that OS X does as much as Windows does.
If you're looking at the whole package, I'd be hard pressed to find a laptop I like more then the MacBook family(thats for me, if anyone would rather a windows laptop, go for it!)
When you look at the whole package, you'll see that Macs fall even farther behind PCs. Not only do they tend to cost twice as much as equally spec'ed PCs, but you'll see that you're getting a far more limited system in terms of specs and connectivity. A $1299 PC will have twice the RAM of a $1999 MacBook Pro, will have the same CPU, twice the HDD space, blu-ray, HDMI, card readers, VGA, eSATA, higher screen resolution, etc. etc. Then you look at the software and you'll see that OS X doesn't have nearly the same amount of third party software available, or even the quality of 3rd party software, and the pack-in software is mostly software you won't use.
If you hadn't noticed, HP just had a recall on batteries that caused fires? I suppose I should say that they have a lacking customer support, then?
70,000 batteries compared to the millions that were recalled by Apple a few years back
And Apple's customer support, again, is no better than the rest. I've never had any company other than Apple have an "executive" customer relations person call me up and accuse me of trying to scam the company out of a refund when all I wanted was my system repaired and I had made that very clear in my emails, phone calls, and voice mails.
I don't watch Blu-Ray because I don't believe it's nearing the new standard. The way technology is today, I won't need to.
Well, thats where you're wrong. If you compare blu-ray at this current point in its life to DVD at the same point in its life, you'll see that blu-ray adoption is happening at TWICE the rate of DVD. At the same point in its life, DVD had 4% marketshare. Blu-ray currently has 8%. So it will become the mainstream standard faster than DVD did. It took DVD 6 years to have 51% marketshare. We should see blu-ray reach that goal at least a bit faster than that.
And what do you mean you won't need to? Downloaded movies from iTunes and Amazon and Netflix can't even begin to compare to blu-ray quality. You're comparing half the resolution with sometimes as little as 1/10th the bitrate as well as overly compressed audio (compared to lossless and uncompressed on blu-ray).. theres just no comparison, blu-ray is light years ahead of downloadable movies. Plus you have to take into consideration the fact that the average broadband connection worldwide (even in the US) isn't even capable of streaming one of those so-called high definition films in real time.
When Blu-Ray prices drop alongside their players, that's when I'll start worrying that my Mac is unable to play the discs. Which, I'm assuming they will.
Well, blu-ray costs no more now than DVD did at the same point in its life. The players now cost the same as DVD players did in 1999 and 2000, and blu-ray discs cost the same as DVDs did then. I remember buying plenty of DVDs for $20 and $25 the same way the average blu-ray disc is $20 now.
And I don't know if Apple will be able to support blu-ray in OS X, unless they finally get with the times and finally enable full bitstream decoding on the GPU.
I have had tons of software incompatibles under my switch to Vista, as a pre-bought machine.
I've had none. And I'm playing 10 year old games like the original Unreal!
Even my original first pressed Half-Life CD works fine.
HP's own webcam didn't work until I went to the HP website and downloaded them (mind you, the control panel didn't automatically download it, nor manually). Don't you know where all this Vista crap is stemming from?
HP has been using the same webcam module for about 3 years now. I've had it on several different systems as well as XP and Vista. I have NEVER had it not work.
There have already been benchmarks showing that XP had/has considerable more FPS when running games in comparison to Vista. I did not like the operating system regardless of the media. Sorry.
Those are two year old benchmarks from when Vista was first released. Check out the benchmarks from 6 months after launch, as well as SP1 release. You'll see Vista is equal to XP in gaming performance.
HDMI has just become the standard. I have no idea how you can say that it's everywhere.
HDMI has just become the standard? No. PC GPUs started shipping with HDMI way back in 2003. Those desktop GPUs couldn't pass audio, but they did support the video standard. In 2006 desktop GPUs started passing audio as well. In 2006 after HD DVD and blu-ray launched, PC notebooks started shipping with HDMI that could pass audio, with HDMI becoming standard fare in 2007. LCD monitors started having HDMI inputs around 2005. Apple is pretty much the only company NOT supporting HDMI at the moment.
Adapters are more than plastic and signal conversion and obviously take more than $1 to make. You need to map the pins and upload firmware. Then worry about the signal conversion.
Okay, so Apple pockets $27 of every $30 adapter they sell
The point is that they don't support standards. Why? Profit. It's better for Apple to sell and make a $27 profit off an adapter than pay the 3 cent licensing fee to include HDMI in their systems.
Ok? So you're arguing about which standard is better? Obviously HDMI wins because it's been around longer and has more adaptations. Why is this relevant?
Because of the fact that HDMI has been standard on other systems for years now, while Apple refuses to support standards in the name of profits.
HP Wireless Service (which does nothing Windows can't do) takes up 1GB itself. Then you have the HP tools to make sure you PC is running fine (which does nothing apart from telling you when you need to update your warranty and to calibrate the battery) take up anther few GB.
Wrong and wrong. Both services only take up a few hundred megabytes. Both can be uninstalled easily.
I'm unsure why, knowing these downsides, you bought a Mac in the first place.
Because I didn't know the downsides when I first bought it. You see, Apple and the Apple Apologists don't tell you the real story about owning a Mac or the hardware limitations. All you hear about is how great it is. It isn't until after you buy it and use it in your own home do you realize that you didn't get as much as you could have hardware wise and the software is incredibly limited and unstable.
Honestly, I take solace in the fact that I am not speaking to men in India whom I cannot understand and they cannot understand given my accent.
No, you'll just talk to someone in the United States with a very thick Spanish accent that is just as difficult to understand.
I have been hung up numerous times by Dell's "customer support" and one fellow went as far as saying "you are wasting my time."
Just like when Ken Bell called me and told me I was trying to scam Apple out of a refund when I had told him in numerous voice mails and emails that all I wanted was a repair.
I should not have had to go that for for three defective machines that were rendered useless, not a minor issue.
The same way I had to end up on my third Mac before finally getting one without problems?
Thats after getting yelled at by "Executive Customer Support" mind you.
Macs can handle external displays VERY well, don't BS.
I use Windows on my mac, with my external, i have to reconnect it 2-3 times to get it to work, and sometimes it screws up the resolution, sometimes it mirrors my display, and sometimes it just gets rid of the display on my MacBook and uses the external as a primary display!
I use multiple external displays on my Mac. In Windows, it remembers each display and how each one is configured and defaults to that configuration each time. In OS X I have to start the system up and close it extremely fast for it to only use the external display, or I have to wait for it to finish booting and then close it and then wake it back up.
I have never encountered any of the above issues on OS X, and i don't even think you can calibrate displays properly on Windows, unless there are not any obvious ways to do it.
Windows is properly calibrated by default. But nvidia and ATI provide very in-depth tools with their drivers to calibrate the display if you do want to tweak it. More in-depth than the calibration tool in OS X.
I have no use for an HDMI input when the MDP to HDMI, to DVI, and VGA are far more useful given we have a mix of projectors, LCD's, and regular monitors. 4GB of RAM is what, $45 these days? Wow, I think I can swing that cost. Let me look under my couch cushions.
Let's see here. Windows notebook PCs ship with HDMI and VGA. HDMI can be converted to DVI with a $2 adapter. So on a Mac, you need a $15 adapter (MDP to HDMI), and then another $30 adapter (MDP to DVI) and yet another $30 adapter (MDP to VGA) to get all of the same connectivity included with a PC. Yeah that makes sense. Oh, and every respectable display made in the last 3 or so years has included HDMI.
Card readers are unnecessary for me and a lot of peole when there's this thing called a card reader.
USB card readers are slower than built-in card readers. Plus they eat up the already extremely limited number of USB ports on a Mac.
Here, since we're lofting personal anecdotes over the net: I'm looking at a Thinkpad T61p with an nVidia Quadro that Win7RC auto installs the driver, but it blue screens every once and awhile. nVidia's driver won't install either, because it finds "no suitable device" (even though it's for the same identical card on Windows 7). Hmmm, ain't that odd?
Then theres something else wrong with your system. Nvidia offers mobile Quadro drivers on their website for Windows 7 and they DO work.
No driver for the fingerprint reader either.
Nearly all built-in fingerprint readers on notebook PCs are made and sold by AuthenTec. Thats what I've had in every HP, and thats the one I have now that works fine under Windows 7. So you're either being dishonest or you have a different manufacturer.
And a lot of people watch American Idol, that doesn't mean it's the golden standard for musical talent.
Theres a big difference between an entertainment TV show and reporting news.
Unlike HP, wants you to take down a server in the middle of the day just to make sure a blown redundant power supply is really dead.
Just like Apple's executive support calling you and yelling at you
XP is not as secure as Vista, but it is every bit as stable and definitely faster than Vista on the same hardware.
Thats funny because every benchmark from the last year and a half has proven otherwise.
The very existance of iWeb created sites points to proof that iWeb is not "useless". If some people find it useful, then it's not useless. You may not like the site, you may feel the need to insult the site owners (and you do that quite well), but it most certainly shows iWeb is useful to many people.
iWeb is nothing more than a paid version of free tools that are available for Windows. It's nothing special and every site looks the same.
GarageBand: again, as evidenced by the forums and sites dedicated to it, it is a useful app for many. I use Logic, but GarageBand is still very capable. No, that crap application by M-Audio you keep posting does not touch GB, and your continual posting of it shows your lack of experience with digital audio workstation apps.
Good job making me laugh
I'll take the opinion of actual contracted recording artists that say that M-Audio's app is better than Garageband by a long shot.
To get something equivalent to iMovie would require buying Vegas Movie Studio (which I own) or Adobe Premiere Elements. No, the apps included with camcorders aren't as good as iMovie; they're often trialware, seriously lacking in features, have serious usabilty issues, or all 3. Having purchased 2 Sonys and 2 Canon HD units within the last 2 years, I highly disagree that anything included with a camcorder is worth the CD it's burned on.
We've gone over this before. I've already proven that the apps included with digital video cameras are FULL versions. And, again, that $50 TV tuner I bought 5 years ago came with full version video and DVD editing software that is still more advanced than iMovie or iDVD.
Even when in Windows I never touch it. Also, after 3 MacBooks, 2 MacBook Pros, and 2 Mac Pros, none of them came with any trialware such as Office or iWork. Just iLife, which is used often.
Two of my Macs did ship with Office and iWork trials. They also shipped with some nonsense board game trialware.
Show me a fingerprint reader than works reliably. HP and Lenovo aren't correct answers.
Mine have always worked every single time. Works perfect on the first swipe.
I watch Blu Rays all the time......on my big screen HD TV, where you can really see the HD difference. I play L4D all the time on my MBP quite nicely, thank you.
The increase in quality blu-ray offers can be seen on any non-SD display. That is a fact. Blu-ray downsampled to the roughly 1 million pixel display of the MacBook will look better than DVD's 345,600 pixel display that is upscaled by over 2 times.
You're in denial again. You've never heard of Vista driver issues? Really? Is Google broken on your computer?
Vista hasn't had any driver issues since about 1 month after release. The "Vista driver issue" is even more overblown than Apple claiming its easy for someone to get a virus.
It's useless? Wow, I must be imagining the Logitech mouse I'm using right now then. Figment 'O my imagination!
I have the Bluetooth Logitech MX Revolution, as well as the MX5500 keyboard. If I use OS X's built-in bluetooth I lose the connection all the time and it's impossible for me to wake the system up without opening the lid and causing the multiple displays to get messed up.