Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why did Apple release a half-baked iCloud Photo service in the first place? I'd rather wait for a polished, ready to use feature than be provided one which isn't ready for full use and which causes more confusion and frustration for its users.

I hate to say this but Apple's QC has definitely gone down in the recent years both in their hardware and software.

You're not forced to use it though (and it isn't turned on by default) and if you don't, then things just continue as they were before
 
I think iCloud is actually a great service and despite it's growing pains, it has now accomplished many feats of implementing cloud features for the average Joe:

- An email account
- Contact, calendar and reminder backup/syncing
- iOS device backups
- Find My iPhone

There are other features too, and newer ones that aren't quite perfectly intuitive, but they work. Photos definitely needs some cross-functional help, as it runs across iCloud, iOS and OS X.

iCloud excels for syncing non-critical data between devices. But for any situation where it has to store important data, there needs to be a way to back it up independently of the data being cached on devices.

I use it myself for device backups and syncing configuration data around, but refuse to depend on it for important data until this issue is resolved.

Keeping a full cache of the iCloud account's data on your Mac and backing that folder up with time machine would mostly resolve this issue.
 
My biggest problem with the whole iCloud Photo Library is the "all or nothing" approach Apple seems to have towards it.

For example, enabling it will disable the ability to sync photos from Aperture or iPhoto to your phone. Completely.

It's as if Apple expects me to upload my entire photo collection (several hundred GB) to the cloud to be able to continue to do what I do now, which is view selected parts of my photo library on my phone.

Not. Bloody. Likely.

Photos are among the most important data I have. They are irreplaceable. A few are private and I don't want them on the Internet. Apple has also failed to tell us exactly how we are supposed to BACK UP the iCloud Photo Library. All indications point to the cloud library being authoritative. Does Apple really expect us to trust them with the ONLY authoritative copy of our photos? Are they insane?

They did not think this through. Hopefully the delays mean they ARE thinking it through now and will implement it properly. However, I'm not holding my breath and I'm keeping my options open for now.

For everyone who thinks Apple should care about this post, forget it. iCloud photos are for people who currently keep all their photos on their phone not backed up. That's most people. If you currently are managing your photos actively, you aren't the target audience. Back off, keep doing what you are doing, don't waste your breath.
 
Just out of curiosity : what issues are you people having with iCloud Drive ?
The few times I used it ( I'm a long time Dropbox user, and rely mostly on it ) everything was smooth, I haven't noticed anything bad.

My main issue is the inability to back it up automatically like you can any other storage device. That's why I only use it as a temporary storage location.
 
My biggest problem with the whole iCloud Photo Library is the "all or nothing" approach Apple seems to have towards it.

For example, enabling it will disable the ability to sync photos from Aperture or iPhoto to your phone. Completely.

It's as if Apple expects me to upload my entire photo collection (several hundred GB) to the cloud to be able to continue to do what I do now, which is view selected parts of my photo library on my phone.

Not. Bloody. Likely.

Photos are among the most important data I have. They are irreplaceable. A few are private and I don't want them on the Internet. Apple has also failed to tell us exactly how we are supposed to BACK UP the iCloud Photo Library. All indications point to the cloud library being authoritative. Does Apple really expect us to trust them with the ONLY authoritative copy of our photos? Are they insane?

They did not think this through. Hopefully the delays mean they ARE thinking it through now and will implement it properly. However, I'm not holding my breath and I'm keeping my options open for now.

it's better than the current way.
if i need to delete a photo, i need to delete it from camera roll, photostream, recently deleted, and iPhoto (since it auto imports photostream)

explaining this to my mom is never going to happen.
 
I have always found iCloud to be a shocking mess, so I'm not sure how these "Deep Organisational Issues" are news.

Apple has a deep disrespect for customer data. No one in their right mind would trust iCould because Apple is way too welcome to say, oops we figured you did not need that anymore.

Now I have no problem with the Apple hardware single source ecosystem. But my data single sourced with Apple's 'I don't care about last years' attitude. No Way!
 
I do not think this is linked *only* with iCloud, but the rest of the company.

Apple are not structurally well placed at the moment, it's bleeding out into the product line.
 
My biggest problem with the whole iCloud Photo Library is the "all or nothing" approach Apple seems to have towards it.

For example, enabling it will disable the ability to sync photos from Aperture or iPhoto to your phone. Completely.

It's as if Apple expects me to upload my entire photo collection (several hundred GB) to the cloud to be able to continue to do what I do now, which is view selected parts of my photo library on my phone.

Not. Bloody. Likely.

Photos are among the most important data I have. They are irreplaceable. A few are private and I don't want them on the Internet. Apple has also failed to tell us exactly how we are supposed to BACK UP the iCloud Photo Library. All indications point to the cloud library being authoritative. Does Apple really expect us to trust them with the ONLY authoritative copy of our photos? Are they insane?

They did not think this through. Hopefully the delays mean they ARE thinking it through now and will implement it properly. However, I'm not holding my breath and I'm keeping my options open for now.

iPhoto and Aperture are dead. Am I the first to tell you this?
 
For everyone who thinks Apple should care about this post, forget it. iCloud photos are for people who currently keep all their photos on their phone not backed up. That's most people. If you currently are managing your photos actively, you aren't the target audience. Back off, keep doing what you are doing, don't waste your breath.

I'd be happy to continue doing what I'm doing, however Apple has stopped development on Aperture (which I paid for) and iPhoto. There's probably a good chance that the ability to sync photos from your computer to iOS devices will eventually be removed too.

I've been fairly happy with Apple and their products, but have concern that they may eventually become a hostile to people who need to manage their own data. I have great hope that they don't.
 
The whole photos in the cloud thing is confusing. It would be nice to see a coherent vision.

Currently we have some cloud services, like Facebook and Tumblr where we store photos and then the camera roll on our phones. I think I'm alone among my friends in actually using iPhoto to create events and manage photos, keeping my camera roll as clear as possible.

Do we need another cloud service where our photos live? Or a cloud service to keep our devices in sync?
 
I don't see any good reason why you can't opt in to iCloud Photo Library AND also be able sync albums/events from iPhoto and Aperture to your devices. It seems like a completely unnecessary restriction on Apple's part.
 
I like iCloud Drive, it makes sense to me how it works within the ecosystem (the files way up in the actual cloud are left alone and only imported/copied within a specific app; if files need to be deleted from that app, it doesn't trash your originals). More apps on iOS need access though, Mail comes immediately to mind.

Photo Library? I barely even know anything about it, only that 1. it seems to be a cluster, 2. when can I just create a folder, move *selected* photos to it, and designate only THOSE to sync? And sure, you could say just do that via drag and drop to iCloud Drive, but now the issue makes itself present.... what is Library going to do or not do VS Drive and so forth...............

Please simplify this Apple...
 
I'd be happy to continue doing what I'm doing, however Apple has stopped development on Aperture (which I paid for) and iPhoto. There's probably a good chance that the ability to sync photos from your computer to iOS devices will eventually be removed too.

I too use iPhoto to manage my photos. I don't think we'll be forced to stop using iPhoto (or in your case, Aperture), until there is a final, non-beta, finished product.
 
I'm waiting to see iBooks folder in icloud drive to sync PDFs collections between devices. Also music/iTunes integration with icloud drive to access, add, delete MP3 files and seamlessly be synchronized across all devices. iTunes match for tv shows and movies please? Also overhaul on family sharing with more credit card options, and I haven't tried to ponder how gift cards fit into the plans payment system.

Get it together! Ever since Siri, they have been releasing too many betas. I liked apple because everything was structured by its release, but it seems like they've been lacking the development completion aspect of it.
 
iCloud is the biggest piece of garbage Apple has ever come up with,
followed closely by iTunes...

What about Ping? Or the original iPod earbuds? Not many agree with me, but I would vote for iTunes Match. Horrible for me though it seems most people had a better experience.
 
I was thinking about 10.10 and 8.1, and how every year they pile on features, which I appreciate, but they don't fix them up or polish them, they just keep blazing away.

Apple, take 1.5 years, fix everything you have right now, optimize the software, give us some great working services, then implement your new stuff again.
 
Just out of curiosity : what issues are you people having with iCloud Drive ?
The few times I used it ( I'm a long time Dropbox user, and rely mostly on it ) everything was smooth, I haven't noticed anything bad.

On iOS you can't rename, delete or move documents about in iCloud Drive because the only real access you have is that stupid document picker.

You can't remove things like numbers, pages folders etc from the picker even though you don't have those apps installed.

Why they couldn't have made the iCloud Drive iOS version the same as the OS X version is beyond me.
 
Just out of curiosity : what issues are you people having with iCloud Drive ?

In short, it has nowhere near the level of functionality that it should do. Apple clearly want to compete with established services like Dropbox and OneDrive, but rather than emulating the simplicity of file-folder hierarchies and similar management on mobile devices, they've built upon the convoluted system of apps having 'containers'. This makes no sense at all - if you turn iCloud Drive ON, why should you have deal with these containers and their aliases?

What's worse is that Apple expect people to use their service on a day-to-day basis for work. Unless they get real and sort out the file management on iOS, they'll continue to trail behind.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.