If Congress was working for the people, President Obama would already have been impeached years ago, removed from office and imprisoned for life. This isn’t the Hope and Change that was voted for.
Well it's hard when you gotta catch em all. He wants to be the very best; that no one ever was. To catch them is his real test, to squash them is his cause.The "expert" bug catcher. Doesn't do to good of a job eliminating bugs...
I knew that would happen, These guys are heroic. Apple and it's employees are literally at gunpoint to produce x because the government wants it. What the hell is happening in The Land of the Free...
A Farce Stopping a Farce? How would that work exactly?This farce has to come to an end... US Congress has to stop this.
Obama would have to sign it. No way!
We have to consider a "common law filing" which bypasses DoJ. Is it even legally possible?
The current POTUS routinely pushes away proffered documents that would deny permission for drone strikes -- strikes which often result in the death of innocent people. At least one instance caused the death of an American citizen. He was killed without trial or any due process under law, because a faceless bureaucrat said he was tied to "terrorists".
Given this backdrop, does anyone think the same federal government will simply give up and shrug its shoulders should Apple lose their legal battle and still refuse to comply with a court order to create the software?
President Obama has murdered four Americans with drones, one was 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki. So not only has Obama murdered more civlians with drones than Osama had murdered civilians with planes (technically making Obama a worse terrorist than Osama, at least in civilian kill count), Obama murdered an American teenager with drones, to boot.
Well, try opening your mouth and saying the word "No". Now imagine you are an employee at Apple and your manager tells you to write this code. You just repeat what you've just done. You open your mouth and say "No".
No and here is why, they didn't have the kind of money Apple does. The FBI was not smart about how it went about this. Rather than waiting until a phone from a smaller company (say HTC for example) with similar features we needed to be unlocked, they decided to go up against Apple. Why would this have made a difference? HTC most likely would not have had enough money to fight the FBI as far as Apple can, unless Apple and other companies decided to back them and to be honest, they might have as it is a pivotal case in legal terms. And unless the other companies did back them, the FBI would have had an almost automatic win with very little publicity and legal precedent would have been set and they could have forced Apple to comply already.Is there going to be another Waco, TX in Cupertino. Grabbing the popcorn
They would be arrested for contempt of court at bare minimum, but I don't think they would stay in jail long, as I would imagine Apple's legal team would be at their disposal.That would make sense, but I expect the FBI to go fully mental and try to detain these engineers.
They should just write really buggy code... The kind that prevents iOS from booting.
Apple and it's employees are literally at gunpoint to produce x because the government wants it.
1. There're are other methods to extract the data the FBI refuses because this is about a precedent, not a case. 2. there is no valuable data. 3. Apple is protecting the very concept of security against all governments, with USA as the test case because they can compel. Apple can of course, dissolve as a corporation in response.Why can't Apple make this hacked version of iOS, and keep it offline, keep it from leaking, and only install it on this one iPhone to hack into it, extract the data, then just delete the hacked version of iOS so no one ever gets a hold of it? I'm sure there's more to it, but I don't know what. Or does the FBI actually want this version of iOS pushed onto all iPhones??
OkIf apple lose... I'm done with iPhones and iPad or any idevices. If they ask Apple to unlock people's computer.. I'm done with Apple. It wouldn't be any different that iPhones and Galaxy phones or window 10 spying or broken OS X.
He does a better job than some do at catching spelling errors...
Those employees are acting like cowards. The reason the government wants this piece of software is to investigate a terrorist shooting where 14 innocent civilians were murdered in cold blood, not to snoop on every iPhone on the planet. Good grief, if any situation compels access, it's this one. What if it was your mother or father or brother or sister or wife that was killed in the attack? Just let the killers and their comrades get away with it because, well, keeping my cat videos private is more important.
NOBODY is asking for EVERY iPhone to have a back door, plain and simple, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying or has no clue of the scope of the legal requests here. Apple has the technology and the security to comply with this request, and they should. Let the FBI investigate into this one phone, per the court order. Yes, there may be more requests for access to different phones in future law enforcement investigations, how could one not think there would not be? But each of those would have to go through the same legal safeguards of a warrant and court order before anyone could access those individual phones.
They would be arrested for contempt of court at bare minimum, but I don't think they would stay in jail long, as I would imagine Apple's legal team would be at their disposal.
Congress already did, in 1994.
Section 1002.b.1 of the CALEA (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act) specifically forbids the government to "require any specific design of equipment, facilities, services, features, or system configurations from any phone manufacturer:
(b) Limitations
(1) Design of features and systems configurations
This subchapter does not authorize any law enforcement agency or officer—
(A) to require any specific design of equipment, facilities, services, features, or system configurations to be adopted by any provider of a wire or electronic communication service, any manufacturer of telecommunications equipment, or any provider of telecommunications support services; or
(B) to prohibit the adoption of any equipment, facility, service, or feature by any provider of a wire or electronic communication service, any manufacturer of telecommunications equipment, or any provider of telecommunications support services.
More about CALEA below:
https://www.fcc.gov/public-safety-a...ng-division/general/communications-assistance
This was passed by Congress in 1994, and trumps the All Writs Act.
BL.
So then bottom line is no government should be trusted anyway around the world, yet everyone socially relies on a government to support the growing up.If apple lose... I'm done with iPhones and iPad or any idevices. If they ask Apple to unlock people's computer.. I'm done with Apple. It wouldn't be any different that iPhones and Galaxy phones or window 10 spying or broken OS X.
Apple is not a telecommunication company.
However, Apple is a provider of telecommunications equipment.
BL.
Moot point as Apple is not going to lose this case.
But there's also nothing the court can do if these employees simply resign and no longer work for Apple at that point.
Doesn't matter.