but that was before the terrorist trump card. the wedge has gotten a lot bigger since the 90s.They were sure they were going to win the Clipper Chip issue in the 90's, too.
If it really comes down to it, Apple could take this project as a government contract, and as most government contracts go, simply stall and not get anywhere for a long time while essentially milking the government for funding of said contract and ultimately either just don't deliver or deliver something that doesn't really do what was asked or really anything at all (again, as many government projects end up being).
If you think it is impossible for Apple to make a backdoor that only works on one iPhone, then explain how Apple can restrict apps I buy from working on someone else's iPhone.
Well I guess some employee's of Apple will be arrested...
NOBODY is asking for EVERY iPhone to have a back door, plain and simple, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying or has no clue of the scope of the legal requests here. Apple has the technology and the security to comply with this request, and they should. Let the FBI investigate into this one phone, per the court order. Yes, there may be more requests for access to different phones in future law enforcement investigations, how could one not think there would not be? But each of those would have to go through the same legal safeguards of a warrant and court order before anyone could access those individual phones.
Sorry mate, I don't agree.Good on them for sticking up for thier briefs , though if they don't do it, someone else will. Not worth loosing you job over it .
Well.... If the OP meant to use the word "too" but left off the final "o", then it's a spelling error. If the OP doesn't know the difference between "too" and "to" it is, of course, an error of grammarTechnically, that is a grammar error and not a spelling error. People in glass houses....
If Apple is forced, sooner or later Google will be forced, and Microsoft too... It's not about this specific case. It's about the precedent...I hear you...but if apple was forced to make a next ios to have back door.....well.....
Exactly this.Countries such as China, India, Turkey, South Africa are waiting to do the same, once the US forces Apple to give them a hack code. Real shame the land of the free today has no freedoms or privacy left. In spite of the bill of rights codified in our constitution here we are. The US high court has continuosly undermined state rights and individual rights by misinterpreting the "commerce" clause and "taxing authority" to allow the federal government to do what ever it wants.
That's correct. Either way....if apple lose.....then....If Apple is forced, sooner or later Google will be forced, and Microsoft too... It's not about this specific case. It's about the precedent...
Exactly this.
This is a scary scenario. China and Korea with such a piece of software available...
The "expert" bug catcher. Doesn't do to good of a job eliminating bugs...
There is no way to do this without breaking the encryption on everyone else phone. That is the problem and once done Apple can't guarantee its secrecy and safety....just like how they are unable to keep iPhones secret and data about them secret. Its just not in the cards. sorry. Apple has given up the information they have access to. Secondly China and Russia and others will want similar access once created. So no.Those employees are acting like cowards. The reason the government wants this piece of software is to investigate a terrorist shooting where 14 innocent civilians were murdered in cold blood, not to snoop on every iPhone on the planet. Good grief, if any situation compels access, it's this one. What if it was your mother or father or brother or sister or wife that was killed in the attack? Just let the killers and their comrades get away with it because, well, keeping my cat videos private is more important.
NOBODY is asking for EVERY iPhone to have a back door, plain and simple, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying or has no clue of the scope of the legal requests here. Apple has the technology and the security to comply with this request, and they should. Let the FBI investigate into this one phone, per the court order. Yes, there may be more requests for access to different phones in future law enforcement investigations, how could one not think there would not be? But each of those would have to go through the same legal safeguards of a warrant and court order before anyone could access those individual phones.
You have to get hired first.If Apple are short of willing engineers, I would be happy to take on the rôle of fully assisting the FBI single-handedly.
What I lack in experience, I would make up for in enthusiasm. I can't guarantee how long it would take me to create a version of iOS that grants easier access to people's data, but even if it takes me the rest of my life, I’ll do it. Who knows, I may not even succeed, but I’ll try my level best.
I'm sure Apple would be only too happy to pay me a handsome wage for my efforts; I'm just the man they're looking for…
If Apple was interested you'd be hired already.Sounds like some positions are opening up at Apple. Time to update the ol résumé.
Thats not in the cards and we all know it.So... if Apple loses the court case and orders its engineers to unlock the devices, and they refuse... fire them.
Sounds like some positions are opening up at Apple. Time to update the ol résumé.
I don't think its going to happen honestly because its an election year. Apple could use their money to run people out of congress. Who knows what other tech companies would do in response...Judges have significant latitude to compel compliance of those found in contempt. Here are some remedies I believe that could be employed by justice:
I certainly hope that the case is settled in Apple's favor because this has the potential to get really ugly.
- Apple could be fined significantly if they exceed their previously stated timeline of a few weeks to comply. The fines could be increased or doubled over time. The fines would be set to create a significant impact.
- The "Corporation" cannot be put in jail, but the officers of the corporation certainly can. However, video of marshals perp-walking Tim, Craig, Eddy and Jeff would pretty much lead to the next American revolution.
- I can't imagine that the engineers mentioned could be personally compelled to comply, however Apple could be compelled to hire or contract the talent necessary to comply with all penalties mentioned above used to enforce.
Why do people keep bringing up privacy? Its not a winning argument. The only winning argument here is security of everyone else's phones from terrorists, criminals and other hackers. Anonymous just hacked ?Donald Trump today. I wonder who in the FBI is next....No and here is why, they didn't have the kind of money Apple does. The FBI was not smart about how it went about this. Rather than waiting until a phone from a smaller company (say HTC for example) with similar features we needed to be unlocked, they decided to go up against Apple. Why would this have made a difference? HTC most likely would not have had enough money to fight the FBI as far as Apple can, unless Apple and other companies decided to back them and to be honest, they might have as it is a pivotal case in legal terms. And unless the other companies did back them, the FBI would have had an almost automatic win with very little publicity and legal precedent would have been set and they could have forced Apple to comply already.
Instead they are going after Apple, which they knew would have major publicity AND they also knew Apple had enough money to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. What they were hoping was that the public would be on their side and not Apple's, which was a major misstep for them. So in the end, legal precedent will be set, I just hope it is in Apple's favor, as anything else spells doom for privacy matters.
What was he going to be impeached for? being black while president... tearing down the wall of white privilege...If Congress was working for the people, President Obama would already have been impeached years ago, removed from office and imprisoned for life. This isn’t the Hope and Change that was voted for.
Apple is not a telecommunication company.
Put simply, CALEA is entirely inapplicable to the present dispute [because] Apple is not acting as a telecommunications carrier, and the Order concerns access to stored data rather than real time interceptions and call-identifying information
What was he going to be impeached for? being black while president... tearing down the wall of white privilege...
I'll say that I think Obama's stance on prosecuting whistleblowers is absolutely disgusting as well as the raids on pot dispensaries going up, but everything else sounds like some crap Rush Limbaugh would say with a vein popping out of his head. I think he's agreed to do some terrible things that aren't good for the country, but to say he's the worst president ever and should be impeached? Meh. He's a cog in a big machine. And he's not even the worst of it. If anything, I'd view him as a scapegoat to distract us from the real bad guysYour Race Card® expired in 2010. One thing, would be his illegally spying on over 100,000,000 Americans daily. And from the start of Obama’s presidency, he has continued and expanded Bush’s illegal spying programs worse than what Bush did. Another thing, from the very start of Obama’s presidency, he has been committing treason by intentionally withholding the 28 pages on foreign government(s) involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Not only has he continued to protect 9/11 co-conspirators, he has conspired with those very 9/11 co-conspirators in arming terrorists in Syria to attempt an overthrow of the legitimate Syrian government (a government that has not attacked the U.S. or even threatened to). That is treason x2. Something else, Obama has continued and expanded by at least 10x the extrajudicial mass murder drone program, that has killed over 90% civilians, thousands of civilians, and resulted in the murdering of at least four American citizens including an American teenager. Obama deserves to be in ADX Florence for life, with other terrorists and anti-American traitors, for those and many other crimes he also has committed.
Sorry mate, I don't agree.
If you really believe in something, it worths fighting for it...
I'll say that I think Obama's stance on prosecuting whistleblowers is absolutely disgusting as well as the raids on pot dispensaries going up, but everything else sounds like some crap Rush Limbaugh would say with a vein popping out of his head. I think he's agreed to do some terrible things that aren't good for the country, but to say he's the worst president ever and should be impeached? Meh. He's a cog in a big machine. And he's not even the worst of it. If anything, I'd view him as a scapegoat to distract us from the real bad guys