MacRumors has been a haven for trolls for years now and as the OP here demonstrates it is officially sanctioned by the owners.
Envy is the common theme by those who can't stand Apple's consistent success.
What’s trollish here? Have you not been to Apple Insider’s forums? It’s Apple-fanatic heaven over there. If someone makes a reasoned critique of Apple, they get treated to hostile ad hominem attacks.
Oh wait; are you saying that anything critical of Apple is the trolling behavior...?
Are you finding them grating?Am I the only one who's tired of the cheese grater jokes?
This is the epitome of snowflake culture.
It's just a joke, man.
The iFixit video was more informative than the stuff we got from iJustine, MKBHD, or Jonathan Morrison, at least when it comes to showing off the insides. We got to see how the top ports and power button look without the case, how the top underside of the case fits the top of the computer, and how to get to the ram.
Yes, the lighting was too dark. Bring out the big lights!
They knew Apple had support documents online but they didn't read the one that explains how to remove the PCIe cards. That was awkward. Hopefully they'll figure it out tomorrow for the real teardown.
Questions:
How much cheese came out the back of the cheese grater Mac, or is it all stuck in the front?
What do the feet look like, so we can see how the wheels attach to them? Are they magnetic like the Apple Pro XDR display's attachment to the stand?
What’s trollish here? Have you not been to Apple Insider’s forums? It’s Apple-fanatic heaven over there. If someone makes a reasoned critique of Apple, they get treated to hostile ad hominem attacks.
^ A triumph of arguing with nothing but logical fallacies (false analogy and strawman) - - it's not easy to craft rhetoric with absolutely no substantive reasoning - - Bravo!Oh wait; are you saying that anything critical of Apple is the trolling behavior...?
Nice find. I think the life of Picasso is very instructive in this. Cubeism, being the art world equivalent of the naked emperor, nonetheless has merit because people pay ridiculous sums for exemplars. Picasso raked it in for very little effort, without even having to die first. People will find excuses on why Apple chose the cheap memory option, such as:Apple ripping off consumers once again ?
https://wccftech.com/apple-mac-pro-ddr4-ecc-memory-cheapest/
Sure they can, but that video sucked both on production quality and content. Not pro...and not fun or entertaining at all.A pro operation can’t have fun? Seriously?![]()
Apple ripping off consumers once again ?
https://wccftech.com/apple-mac-pro-ddr4-ecc-memory-cheapest/
Many buyers of the MacPro will indeed be paying for the RAM to be pre-installed so that it is covered by AppleCare. Then it's just the one step of telling Apple to fix it and getting the faulty unit back into production as soon as possible. A Mac Pro is going to be a money making tool for studios and media professionals who will just swap in a backup Mac Pro to keep production rolling. If you're the type of Mac user who's quibbling about minor variations in RAM, then the Mac Pro isn't for you.
- You aren't paying for the RAM as much as you are paying for support
The issue might be that Apple charges you 5999 for something magical and awesome and when you take a closer look you‘ll eventually find out that they sold you a piece of crap for lots of money.Apple has always sold their upgrades at a premium. You are allowed to purchase your own third party ram to upgrade, I believe, so what’s the issue again?
The issue might be that Apple charges you 5999 for something magical and awesome and when you take a closer look you‘ll eventually find out that they sold you a piece of crap for lots of money.
I can hear Tim Cook laughing „we put in a 256GB SSD combine it with a low end GPU and use cheapest RAM ever and sell it for 5999“
For those who love design, one thing is clear: Apple is not trying to make a machine that just WORKS, they’re trying to create the most perfect machine and experience from start to finish. As in the past: even the packaging is impressive.
Apple ripping off consumers once again ?
https://wccftech.com/apple-mac-pro-ddr4-ecc-memory-cheapest/
Uninformed clickbait. SnazzyQ is flat-out wrong here, and demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of how CAS latency relates to overall memory latency. In fact, Apple is using very expensive, and fast, RAM. That’s why CAS latency must be so high—because cycle time is so short.Nice find. I think the life of Picasso is very instructive in this. Cubeism, being the art world equivalent of the naked emperor, nonetheless has merit because people pay ridiculous sums for exemplars. Picasso raked it in for very little effort, without even having to die first. People will find excuses on why Apple chose the cheap memory option, such as:
And of course the buyer's remorse kicks in and anyone who points out the nakedness of said emperor gets a label such as "troll".
- Apple tested all the memory brands and found this one to be surprisingly the best
- You aren't paying for the RAM as much as you are paying for support
- There is some secret fairy magic to buying the memory from Apple
It’s not the “cheapest RAM ever”. SnazzyQ is an uninformed blogger. His tweet makes him look like an ignorant fool.The issue might be that Apple charges you 5999 for something magical and awesome and when you take a closer look you‘ll eventually find out that they sold you a piece of crap for lots of money.
I can hear Tim Cook laughing „we put in a 256GB SSD combine it with a low end GPU and use cheapest RAM ever and sell it for 5999“
What is up with this type of fact-based and informative post?!?Uninformed clickbait. SnazzyQ is flat-out wrong here, and demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of how CAS latency relates to overall memory latency. In fact, Apple is using very expensive, and fast, RAM. That’s why CAS latency must be so high—because cycle time is so short.
The -062E speed is the fastest part in that list, not the slowest. The -062E parts Apple is using could be run at any of the slower listed clock speeds, with the corresponding CL from the chart he links:
View attachment 883069
CAS latency is only one factor in the equation. The other is cycle time. You don’t know the true latency until you multiply them, as in this chart (I’ve added the data for the 2933MHz memory Apple uses at the bottom):
View attachment 883070
View attachment 883073
Crucial has a good article that discusses this in detail:
https://www.crucial.com/usa/en/memory-performance-speed-latency
[automerge]1576493590[/automerge]
It’s not the “cheapest RAM ever”. SnazzyQ is an uninformed blogger. His tweet makes him look like an ignorant fool.
This article looks like it was written by an AI trained by ingesting screeds written by 5-year-old redditors.Apple ripping off consumers once again ?
https://wccftech.com/apple-mac-pro-ddr4-ecc-memory-cheapest/
The iFixit video was more informative than the stuff we got from iJustine, MKBHD, or Jonathan Morrison, at least when it comes to showing off the insides. We got to see how the top ports and power button look without the case, how the top underside of the case fits the top of the computer, and how to get to the ram.
that thumbnail is viscerally disgusting and displeasing on many levels for me. This may be a bit melodramatic, but that's a really disrespectful thing to do