If iLife '11 is cloud-based, will anyone stick with '09 until the concept matures? I can understand getting rid of iDVD in a cloud-based version of iLife if broadband can approximate DVD transfer rates. But cloud computing in general makes me nervous, especially with the idea of cloud-based OS's.
Unless they modified Time Machine to also be able to browse the web in the future, I doubt they could make iWeb fully HTML5 compliant. At most, I can see an integrated video tag player that you just need to include (and it includes all relevant Javascript code required) and a few Canvas template apps which would still be a good step forward for people that rely on it or things like Dreamweaver (which already has these HTML5 features).
HTML5 right now is far from finalized, except the video and canvas tags. And those are mostly just a big bunch of Javascript to manipulate the DOM to get them to do anything worthwhile.
Personally, VI is the best website maker and it supports all features of every HTML release, even future updates to the spec, so I don't see a reason to use anything else.
Touch on a device with a connected mouse is much inferior and much less precise. A touch based drawing app would require a seperate hardware purchase for most Macs and would be a toy if anything. I still say a image manipulation app is one of the best guesses so far, but it's not going to be touch based that's for sure.
I think he means Vi, the ancient and pretty much universal UNIX text editor.What website maker do you mean? What is VI?
iLife'10 will be released at the September 1st event. Available to buy after the event.
Cheers,
Clinton.
Not really that odd. The MacBook Air update has been imminent for about 6 months, with dozens of threads. They all eventually die.
I don't seen any iLife update coming this year now; surely they would have announced it at the event.
11 pages.Will someone explain to me why this topic generates an 18 page thread.
What is wrong with the current version of iLife that causes such angst?
It's as if you are disappointed that Apple won't give you the opportunity to give them more money to replace a perfectly functioning suite of apps.
It's as if you are disappointed that Apple won't give you the opportunity to give them more money to replace a perfectly functioning suite of apps.
11 pages.
For instance, iWeb is desperate for an update (a major one):
- Flash/HTML5 animations
- more shadow, reflection, rotation options (e.g., skewed, curled, angled)
- rollovers
- optimised coding
- comment box
- more sophisticated counter (hits vs. unique visits)
- Vimeo, Tumblr integration
- Mobile optimisation (iPhone, iPad, etc.)
- member page creation (e.g., visitors creating their own personal page [password-protected or not] on one's iWeb site)
- obviously, more themes, more image frames
- MP3 streaming player (vs. progressive)
- multi-coloured lettering (e.g., top half one colour, bottom half another)
etc. etc. etc.
Actually, according to a very reliable Vietnamese source, iLife '11 has been cancelled. Instead, Apple is working on iLife '12 for January 2012 release.
they need to do a major upgrade to iWork to compete with the new Office