Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bubbasteve said:
That would almost be enough for me to buy an iMac -- I hate to sound like a complete noob though but what do they mean by the iMac HD?

That was my question too, I'm glad it was answered right away so I didn't embarass myself:)
 
minimax said:
Yeah right you click a button or read a line from your peripheral vision.
If you can't read my justification read again, it's clearly there. You use data on your computer screen most of the times. Not for games perhaps but I can't think of many applications besides games that would make proper use of your 'peripheral' factor. In fact, when I use CAD / VIZ I can imagine using peripheral vision to a certain point, but I don't need my peripheral in wide screen but all around, preferably 3:4 and not the 1:2 that's left with all the toolbars etc. with a WS.
I've already said that peripheral vision is better to the sides rather than 'all around'. Therefore if you keep toolbars etc to the side they will be easier to get to, therefore widescreen display would be better. If you honestly prefer 'all around', fine, but that's not the way most things are set up, for reasons I've already gone into.

If you don't think we use peripheral vision all the time, get some plain-lens glasses, and paint out all but a small clear hole in the middle. Try using anything wearing them. How do you think you know where to move your mouse to to hit a button or menu or something you're not directly looking at? It's not all memory.
 
eji said:
...but what about the flipping iMac GPU, eh? I've been holding off for 6 months since the initial release, anxiously clicking refresh on the MR and AI RSS feeds and waiting on word of a RevB that doesn't "feature" a graphics card that was low-end two years ago.

I'm not a gamer. I'm not a video or digital editing professional. I'm just a schmoe who doesn't want to buy a computer that's crippled from the outset. Yeah, the GPU may be fine today. It may be fine next year. But in two years' time it'll be even more ridiculous and won't be able to handle the newest graphics advances in, say, 10.5. If I'm paying $2000, I want guaranteed eye-candy for the next 5 years.

I love you. Pardon me, that may have been forward, but REALLY. I know EXACTLY how you feel. Apple's are upscale computers for the people who were intelligent enough to throw in a few extra bucks and get something that doesn't suck... so why are we getting outdated technology?
 
computerfan said:
You fail to realize that you can buy video content stored on media at a resolution of 1920x1080 progressive. It's rare right now but it will become more popular as the HD standards get pushed and market prices come down. Also, all the ultrahigh end HD monitors (eg 60+ inches) are getting better de-interlacing processors. This means that your interlaced 1080i signal going in can be upsampled to 1080p and look good, ie. no artifacts. I work at a company that creates these chips and as processing power increases, these de-interlacing chips can do magic.

So 1920x1080p (progressive scan) is the way to go!!! So for a 1920x1200 23" iMac, I'd buy it! It would be great for work!
I realize that 1080p material is out there. I left that out in the interest of brevity. Thanks for rounding out what I brought up though and acknowledging that 1080p material is rare. The closest to 1080p broadcast will be 23.98 material with the help of 3:2 pulldown. Otherwise it'll be as you said, distributed by other methods (D-VHS, files on hard drives, WMV9 and upcoming optical disc formats).

At the moment there are only two native 1080p TV monitors on the market and both are 45" Sharp Aquos models. If you have a link to a 60"+ 1080p native screen I'd be interested in learning something new. As far as I know everything else in LCD and plasma TV land is in the 1280x768 neighborhood.
 
revjay said:
It would be great to have a HD display on an iMac, an improved graphics card, but that would only enable viewing...not authoring...why has no one mentioned that a blu-ray burner would be necessary if you wanted your HD production all on one disk?
No one has mentioned that because it's not true. You (well really I) can today burn HD content onto a regular DVD-R and play it back in full HD resolution on an HDTV. You need the $249 AVeL Link player made by IO Data. That thing can play HD content off USB pen drives (as well as DVDs, of course). Hopefully they'll add AVC/H.264 playback to it by way of a firmware update.

You can export WMV9 HD using your Mac by using Flip4Mac.
 
bosrs1 said:
Well anything to replace the last rev of PBs would be nice. The current rev is awful. The trackpad sucks, the graphics cards got no real improvement and I don't know about you, but Bluetooth has always been useless to me so the speed bump on that does nothing for me. I'm glad I bought the 1.33 rev of the PB 12. That was the longest lived rev in a long time, and one of the best ever.

The coolest thing about the current Powerbooks was submitted by a guy at IBM. He figured out how to write a program that accesses the hard drive shock resistant sensor to allow playing games by tilting the powerbook

http://idisk.mac.com/ams2hid/Public/AMS2HID_neverball.mov
 
Rod Rod said:
No one has mentioned that because it's not true. You (well really I) can today burn HD content onto a regular DVD-R and play it back in full HD resolution on an HDTV. You need the $249 AVeL Link player made by IO Data. That thing can play HD content off USB pen drives (as well as DVDs, of course). Hopefully they'll add AVC/H.264 playback to it by way of a firmware update.

You can export WMV9 HD using your Mac by using Flip4Mac.

But can you (I) burn a full 2 hrs of HD content to a DVD-R?
 
revjay said:
But can you (I) burn a full 2 hrs of HD content to a DVD-R?
Yes you can, because WMV9 HD at 8-9mbps is what Microsoft has been showing at demos. I read into the link I provided and it turns out that the AVeL Link Player is firmware updatable, so I figure there's a good chance it should get AVC/H.264 added to it in the next few months.
 
Rod Rod said:
Yes you can, because WMV9 HD at 8-9mbps is what Microsoft has been showing at demos. I read into the link I provided and it turns out that the AVeL Link Player is firmware updatable, so I figure there's a good chance it should get AVC/H.264 added to it in the next few months.

I've got quite a bit to learn...evidenced by my "newbie status"
thanks for the info...
I'm a few years from worrying about HD video editing...my mini DV cam is still quite new...+ it's hard to justify the massive expense for a HD cam today when I'm sill quite happy with regular DV.
I'm sure my opinion will change the more HD content I view and the less expensive the cam's become.
 
StarbucksSam said:
I love you. Pardon me, that may have been forward, but REALLY. I know EXACTLY how you feel. Apple's are upscale computers for the people who were intelligent enough to throw in a few extra bucks and get something that doesn't suck... so why are we getting outdated technology?

Amen. I'm dreaming of a new iMac for my house...the only requirement is that it has to have ANY graphics card better than a 5200. 23" would be great, HD would be great, 2ghz would be marvelous, but all of that stuff is a distant second to a bumped up GPU in my opinion. That's the only thing holding me back.

-Joe
 
MacSA said:
overdue?.......ummmm did you see when Apple last updated the eMac? lol

Agree, but the Powermac is a much more important computer than emac.
all professional folks are in need for a newer machine. Macmini could easily substitute the emac.
 
Reliability

I'm going to be a little more realisitic.
The iBooks won't get a 64mb graphics card, they will just be slightly improved, they also will be out in the latter not quite as soon as some are hoping. The powerbooks all run a 64 mb gpu it ain't happening to the ibooks this time. They should really update the iBooks without worrying too much about the crossover of the Powerbooks, as the Powerbooks do have other features. And they in turn will also get there updates in following months. They really should make the iBook 64mb Gpu.

HD imac I don't know. maybe. Updated GPU's to 128mb at the two top models definately. And the option for a higher type of card.

As for the pro mouse. 2 button, no. They have spent there entire life developing progrmas around this, trying there best to make things more user friendly, this is what they stand for, not giving up and taking the easy route. But a Mouse with a touch like scroll, definately. Its overdue.

I think the main reason for any of these updates (except the iBook) should be to improve reliability. The iMacs have many flaws (the fans, motherboards, psu's etc etc) The powerbooks have trackpad problems, and there isn't even an update. The Monitors (Aluminium) have many colour problems, although I haven't witnessed them in person. The pictures I have seen online do show those yellow stripes, blue stripes and pink patches, but from what I can see they aren't all that bad. But there is still many people complaining, and they have a right to. They are buying the most expensive montiors on the market and from the best recognised brands in graphics computing. I don't know about the powermacs, but there were many psu problems with them earlier, If Im not wrong they are still on going.

IMO all of these issuess should be taken care off immediately. If they choose to throw in some upgrades while doing this then let that be, JUST MAKE SURE THEY WORK PROPERLY. Apple, in order to stay alive are taking as many shortcuts as they can. They are using cheaper manufacturing methods or the testing labs have experienced a cut in funds. Whatever it is SORT IT OUT STEVE!!!

Thank you for reading.
 
revjay said:
I've got quite a bit to learn...evidenced by my "newbie status"
thanks for the info...
I'm a few years from worrying about HD video editing...my mini DV cam is still quite new...+ it's hard to justify the massive expense for a HD cam today when I'm sill quite happy with regular DV.
I'm sure my opinion will change the more HD content I view and the less expensive the cam's become.
You're welcome. I'm learning more all the time, mostly by doing. I think you'll have an HD camcorder within a year. I think the prices of HDV gear will drop and lower tier models will be introduced much more quickly than how it was with miniDV. This guess is based on the recent rollout of those useless (ok, they have some uses, but they're not economically feasible for editing) DVD camcorders.
 
i'll be PO'd if the ibooks go 1.33 to 1.5ghz this soon after the Powerbook update. i say this in all selfishness, as i just got a 12" PB a month ago.

that is way too close of an overlap if you ask me.
they wouldn't sell any 12" powerbooks. especially to the users that buy the 12" because they can't afford the larger ones.
of course i'll live with it if that means we won't be waiting long for a TRUE powerbook revision (G5).
 
burntoutjoy said:
And anyway, the whole 'we work with things that scroll vertically' argument doesn't wash - we have many easy ways to scroll vertically, so it shouldn't be an issue. If you have a 16:9 screen you can make better use of space by scrolling windows that can be scrolled, and keeping other things to the side.

Gah. I completely disagree. When I work, I don't want distractions in the periphery of my vision. I want to see one document and I want to have the text big enough so it doesn't hurt my eyes and enough vertical space so I can view an entire page on the screen (when writing, I mean really writing, you need to have context. You can't get that scrolling up every few sentences to see how you referred to something or how you characterized it 2 paragraphs ago).

At work I have a 19" Dell that I leave rotated at 90 degrees vertically. It has the height of 4, and the width of 3. A 16:10 rotated would be great height-wise, but probably too skinny.

Hey, it's all a matter of preference. 4:3 is mine.

-p-
 
Rod Rod said:
That "unsightly" big white area below the LCD on iMac G5s is a design homage to the original 1984 model Macintosh. The Happy Mac icon used to remind everyone of this part of Apple history until it was retired with the release of Jaguar. I suppose the reference would be clearer if the LCD were 4:3 or 5:4 instead of 16:10, so if you get what you want (a squarer iMac) you might still get what you don't want (white space under the screen).

Actually, the "big white area below the LCD on the iMac G5" is due to a design constraint.

I just replaced a power Supply and it is located at the bottom (center) and uses the entire thickness. and bottom vents the speakers also use the entire thickness of the case.
 
Rod Rod said:
...This guess is based on the recent rollout of those useless (ok, they have some uses, but they're not economically feasible for editing) DVD camcorders.
I wholeheartedly agree with you there...the DVD camcorders 'kinda' make me chuckle...just seems dumb. However, if I was 'Joe Average', I would not be editing my home movies anyway...with a DVD, at least I could play them virtually anywhere.
 
dicklacara said:
Actually, the "big white area below the LCD on the iMac G5" is due to a design constraint.

I just replaced a power Supply and it is located at the bottom (center) and uses the entire thickness. and bottom vents the speakers also use the entire thickness of the case.

What size iMac, 17 or 20"? When we got a 20" at workthe first thing we did was have a look inside. It looked to me that there is room at the top centre to have an iPod dock slot. So you could pop your iPod directly into the top of the iMac. I wonder if there is such a space in the 17". :rolleyes:
 
Tiger in iBook 1.2 GHz?

With the comments about Core Video etc and the upgrade of GPU, does anyone have any ideas or opinions on what the current iBook might be like running Tiger?

I was worried about this hardware "incompatibility" but couldnt wait anymore cuz the damn PC failed me again and I decided to give up on them.

help??
 
r u sure about that one?

Kagetenshi said:
The Japanese, for one.

~J

when is the last time you saw a japanese website that printed text vertically (other than for asthetic reasons)? I have never seen one.
 
damnpanpan said:
With the comments about Core Video etc and the upgrade of GPU, does anyone have any ideas or opinions on what the current iBook might be like running Tiger?

I was worried about this hardware "incompatibility" but couldnt wait anymore cuz the damn PC failed me again and I decided to give up on them.

help??

I can't see you having much of a problem. I have been running 10.3.x on a 350Mhz iMac that I got in 1999. It is slow but it does work. Lots of RAM will help too. :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.