Bring on the complaints and crying.
These same people will complain if Apple moves to the new release cycle Intel is going to. They'll cry that the new processors aren't a big enough leap to justify a new machine.
You can never win. Everyone always wants more than what's announced and for less.
That's really not the case. The most recently released parts that Apple would use in the Macbook Pro lineup, those that include the Iris Pro 580 GPU, were shipping in January 2016. And to the extent Apple will be using parts that include the parts with lesser integrated graphics, those were shipping in September 2015.
At the outside, there's no reason Apple could not have been shipping a Skylake Macbook Pro by the end of Q1'2016 - more than three months ago - if the CPU were the gating factor.
I write this very slowly, I hope you can follow: NO!
T-H-O-S-E "MacBook Pro Skylakes" HAVE BEEN
D-E-L-A-Y-E-D, and you cannot buy them from anywhere. And so can't Apple.
Intel and AMD have both failed in their release schedules. Intel just released Broadwell Xenons last month. AMD just released Polaris series - what was late one year (because the previous TMSC 20nm process was cancelled).
And other laptops have been using Skylakes for a while now. And as for your suggestion of a delay in Skylake, please provide proof as I cannot find any information about that on Google.
Indeed, and Apple is waiting for the versions with the 'high-end' integrated graphics to ship.Integrated graphics are only difference between 00 and 70 models
update cycle decides that they are outdated. they are not updated as they usually are. meaning something big is coming or apple is shifting focus away from macs altogether.Who decides they are outdated? I'm very happy with my 2015 15" Pro. Blazing fast compared to what it replaced (late 08 Pro) and while newer stuff might give me a few more minutes of battery and a few better specs I need a computer to edit 4K videos and this one does it and does it well. Specs are for PC users and always have been.
Who decides they are outdated? I'm very happy with my 2015 15" Pro. Blazing fast compared to what it replaced (late 08 Pro) and while newer stuff might give me a few more minutes of battery and a few better specs I need a computer to edit 4K videos and this one does it and does it well. Specs are for PC users and always have been.
Care to elaborate which i7? Intel has still not released all the Skylake processors it had announced. Look at the 'Release date' column on the right:
View attachment 641238
It is true that shipping on the parts with the Iris Pro 580 was delayed beyond Q1. It is not true that they are "unavailable" or "delayed to unknown time." The i7-6770HQ, for example, has been available and shipping to customers since May.Intel didn't ship any Iris Pro 580 chips on Q1/2016. They didn't ship them even on Q2/2016. They have been delayed to unknown time...
It is true that shipping on the parts with the Iris Pro 580 was delayed beyond Q1. It is not true that they are "unavailable" or "delayed to unknown time." The i7-6770HQ, for example, has been available and shipping to customers since May.
Amazon.If that is true, where are the products?
Amazon.
As for computers containing the mobile i5 and i7 parts with the Iris 550, you can walk into a Microsoft store and pick up a VAIO Z Flip containing either, as has been the case for some months.
Dell, Razer, HP, Asus, Lenovo, etc. have all produced laptops with Skylake chips similar to the MBP.
The 15" MBP is still using Haswell processors, never mind Broadwell, Skylake or Kaby Lake.
It's a great shame, as Apple used to be on the forefront of personal computing. It wasn't too long ago they had chips before any other manufacturer.
Quite frankly, I find it insulting that Apple still charge thousands of dollars for technology which is years old, without reducing the price at all, but there you go.
I can't quite find the exact model where Apple had the chips before general release, but I'm pretty sure it did happen to a couple of the early Intel Macs.
I disagree with your statement in bold, though. That has only tended to be true over the past few years. Take a look at the release dates for past MBPs and the release quarters for their corresponding Intel CPUs:
Intel chip: T8300 (Q1'08)
Mac release date: Feb 26, 2008
Intel chip: T9400 (Q3'08)
Mac release date: Oct 14, 2008
Intel chip: T9550 (Q4'08)
Mac release date: Jan 6, 2009
Intel chip: P8800 (Q2'09)
Mac release date: Jun 8, 2009
Intel chip: i7-620M (Q1'10)
Mac release date: Apr 13, 2010
Intel chip: i7-2720QM (Q1'11)
Mac release date: Feb 11, 2011
Intel chip: i7-2760QM (Q4'11)
Mac release date: Oct 24, 2011
To me, that doesn't look like it always being a generation behind. It's really only very recently the worrying trend of lagging far behind Intel's CPU schedules has appeared.
Perhaps. But don't tell me that a product isn't shipping to or available for purchase by consumers when that's obviously not the case.It's the Iris Pro 580 that has been late. But good, we have finally one computer in the world selling this part. Where's the competition, why Intel only? Low yields perhaps...
It's the Iris Pro 580 that has been late. But good, we have finally one computer in the world selling this part. Where's the competition, why Intel only? Low yields perhaps...
There are some mobile Xeons that came out 31st of May. But it really seems that there's still a production problem with P580.
You guys at macrumours assume that Apple is going to release any new macs until next year...
[doublepost=1469124662][/doublepost]
https://buyersguide.macrumors.com//#Mac
Hey whoa there! Developing those watchbands isn't cheap. Nor was developing a single-port Macbook for those noodle-armed Portlandia hipsters. (It's okay, I'm a native...)
Bring on the complaints and crying.
These same people will complain if Apple moves to the new release cycle Intel is going to. They'll cry that the new processors aren't a big enough leap to justify a new machine.
You can never win. Everyone always wants more than what's announced and for less.
Perhaps. But don't tell me that a product isn't shipping to or available for purchase by consumers when that's obviously not the case.