iSee said:No, the iBook and PowerBook lines *will* merge--really, they almost have already.
BUT, that's not the end of the story... Apple is just making room in the product line for something else. I predict that the iBook and Powerbook lines merge starting in January ((Solo, Dual) X (13", 15", 17")), and by mid-year Apple releases something mindblowingly cool in the the portable market.
It will really be the new consumer line, but a high-end, premium one. Sort of the iPod of the notebook world, although I expect a radical new design. From Apple's persepctive, the problem with the iBook line is that it has become a low end line. The pressure is on to keep lowering it's price--not really Apple's business. They want to be selling consumers $2000 really cool premium, feature-laden laptops, not $1000 mid-to-low-level laptops.
BTW, I kind of like MacBook--it's got a sort of retro-cool.
Stella said:.Mac webmail is down with appropriate messages
Hopefully we are going to get a good webmail client. The existing one is too limited - you can't even set email to read without reading it.
peterburk said:Surely he means a MacTel iBook, not an Intel MacBook!
Can't wait until tonight... only another 2 hours until the keynote. This MacWorld's gonna be good.
mtrctyjoe said:I agree.... I keep forgetting about the potential changes to .Mac... should be fun - maybe I will get something out of my $99.
kainjow said:Sadly, I agree. But I'm hoping for that "one more thing" ...
Porchland said:Depends. Did you have a little surprise when you woke up?
mtrctyjoe said:I agree.... I keep forgetting about the potential changes to .Mac... should be fun - maybe I will get something out of my $99.
I would like it to improve and maybe even reduce in price a little, (£69 in the UK currently, so an improvement for between £49 and £69 would be ideal). If so, I may give it a whirl for at least 12 months.iJaz said:It wasn't too long ago I filled out a questionnaire regarding the .Mac service, hopefully it will improve now.
Or we designate the current i models as Express, (as in Final Cut Express/Pro etc). Then the iMac would become the Mac Express and the iBook, MacBook Express. Also would suggest to customers speed and ease of use. Very good marketing tools. iMac stood for information when the internet was taking off, now peopel want speed and easy to use computers. Express would fit this new model very well.The Man said:Or Apple can do the lines like this:
iPod
iPod nano
iPod shuffle
iPod whatever
iMac
Mac mini
Mac pro
Mac whatever (HDTV, etc)
MacBook
MacBook mini
MacBook pro
iMac would be the exception (instead of simply Mac) because when we talk about Mac, we also talk about the Mac platform.
johnk said:Ok Ive finally have to say something, why does everyone think its going to be the laptops (ibook, or pb) or even the mini. Why replace a 32bit chip with another 32bit chip? Ok its faster. Why not wait until summer for Intels 64bit Merom chips for laptops after all isnt the G5 a 64bit chip, and doesnt his fit remarkably well with what Apple say about the first Intel Macs some time in the summer.
Ok I've said it now; Ill go back in my box.
I like your thinking...Yvan256 said:That could be the difference right there. Single/dual core, GPU/VRAM and max RAM could easily make the difference between iBook/PowerBook while still keeping everything else the same. They could even share the same shell: just continue to make the iBook white and make the PowerBooks black. Keeps the ease of manufacturing both lines of computers as the same, you just swap some parts/colors when building it.
worldwearyeyes said:And anyone else having a hard time SAYING "macBook?" Doesn't flow...