I guess Intel is busy making and selling sizzle, while Apple sells the steak and makes a bundle.
That's pure ignorance. Intel has been reporting record revenues and profits quarter after quarter. I guess Intel and Apple are both dying then.Nothing like an incompetently led dying company taking a dump in the garden of a customer on the way out.
More an attempt to confuse the situation and get purchase intenders to delay purchase decisions until Intel has something competitive.I recently purchased an M1 MacBook Air to replace an aging 2011 iMac. I also work with an Intel computer everyday for work. I am not confused as to which one works best for my everyday computing needs. (Hint: it's not the Intel computer)
But my personal needs aside, it seems that Intel's advertising misses the mark. People who are big into gaming or into scientific workstations are usually not in the market for Macs anyways. It seems like a desperate attempt to hold on to their existing customers.
Because Apple never delivers on their product promises, right? You seem rather jealous of understated success.The Apple Silicon architecture is a Best Fit for the MacBook Air.
Apple can go up a-little (various MacBook Pro models) & down-alittle (a lower-end MacBook Air model) from there, but NOT much in either direction.
Anything more than that is just Tim Cook's Smoke & Mirrors / Dog & Pony Show marketing.
I'm trying not to be objective and not just be an Apple fanboy here, but... this is desperate stuff from Intel, isn't it? Is this the best they can do?
Yes to all this, to superleccy, I come across as an Apple fanboy often so me too often ask myself, but these statements aren’t...How about;
‘If you haven’t had to plug your laptop in all day and it’s still running, you’re on a Mac’
or
‘If you can edit photos while on battery power for more than a couple of hours, you’re on a Mac’
Apparently the two biggest features for Intel are touchscreens and an ancient esports title that you can run on an M1 Mac smoothly with emulation.
What are you talking about? M1 is best fit for the products they’re in, and if you think that this isn’t scalable you’re going to be eating your words in a few months time.The Apple Silicon architecture is a Best Fit for the MacBook Air.
Apple can go up a-little (various MacBook Pro models) & down-alittle (a lower-end MacBook Air model) from there, but NOT much in either direction.
Anything more than that is just Tim Cook's Smoke & Mirrors / Dog & Pony Show marketing.
m1 not perfect point price compare intel. but cheaper value then older generation(worth value).What are you talking about? M1 is best fit for the products they’re in, and if you think that this isn’t scalable you’re going to be eating your words in a few months time.
I would honestly *hate* a touch-screen MacBook. I flip out even seeing a single accidental fingerprint on the screen and will wipe the screen down with a microfiber pretty often. I can't imagine my MacBook screen looking like the mess that is my iPhone screen. 🤢“Only a PC offers tablet mode, touch screen and stylus capabilities in a single device”
Strange, I thought an iPad had all that, too.
You'd have a point if iPad was a Mac. It is not thus Intel claim stands.Doesn't an iPad provide tablet mode, touch screen and stylus capabilities in a single device?
I assume you don't have an iPad then?I would honestly *hate* a touch-screen MacBook. I flip out even seeing a single accidental fingerprint on the screen and will wipe the screen down with a microfiber pretty often. I can't imagine my MacBook screen looking like the mess that is my iPhone screen. 🤢
My Ryzen CPU is by far the best CPU I have ever had in a gaming desktop. Not even close. AMD and Apple are just killing it and I love it!It's funny, I do have a PC for playing Rocket League. However, it has an AMD Ryzen CPU like so many other PCs these days.
I do not. My son does though, and the screen is like some sort of petri-dish of foulness and filth 🤣.I assume you don't have an iPad then?