Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's pure ignorance. Intel has been reporting record revenues and profits quarter after quarter. I guess Intel and Apple are both dying then.

Intel are at risk of being overtaken in multiple angles from not only Apple moving to their own silicon away from Intel, NVIDIA providing compelling compute alternatives, AMD beating down their down and having to outsource to TSMC for fabrication of their chips whilst struggling with their own processes. Intel have missed many of their own roadmap targets over the last few years and lost much of the impressive lead they used to have. They're not down and out by any stretch of the imagination but they're at a junction point.


You'd have a point if iPad was a Mac. It is not thus Intel claim stands.

The ad literally says "it's not a Mac". iPad is not a Mac and difference goes way beyond the name.

The tweet says "Only a PC offers tablet mode, touch screen and stylus capabilities in a single device" which is what draws many to counter with the iPad offers all of those capabilities in a single device. Intel's claim


M1 Macs are going to be a hard sell to Big Corporations with No Bootcamp or dual boot Windows/macOS.
Not to mention Lack of upgrading and probably Tuff to repair.
What you buy at time of sale on an M1 Mac your stuck with.

But of course the Die Hard Apple Fan boys don't or refuse to think of this.

I have worked in IT for Big Corporations.

I know how they feel about Windows, backwards compatibility, cost of ownership and easy of repairs.
Most corporations I've worked with didn't upgrade their computers and generally had an enterprise support contract with their preferred vendor who dealt with machines that failed. AppleCare Enterprise is a pretty solid version with an even better experience than the general AppleCare experience with the added advantage of Apple's retail network of stores as well for first party support and even support for the AASP network as well. Apple's device management framework means that the device is tied to your corporation and even if someone attempts to wipe it, when MacOS comes back up on it again it will reach back to Apple and configure itself based on how the enterprise wants it. The M1 Macs actually provide even more ability to lock down the device which is an advantage for a corporate IT shop.
 
The 11th get i7 1185g7 CPU referenced in the Intel advert is over $400 per unit - my M1 Mac mini bottom of the range cost me $699... and I sold my hex core 3GHz i5 32GB with 512Gb SSD and RX580 eGPU for almost $1500 - I both myself the Mac mini plus bottom of the range MB Air M1 - I do video work with Davinci Resolve - and I'm getting FAR better speed in every way with the M1 - Intel can bleat all they like, I don't care!
Fine, but its not Adobe so hardly a fair comparison. ;)

/s
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
This seems awkward considering apple is still currently a customer of Intel having not fully transitioned away, especially if the rumors of a refreshed Intel Mac Pro are true. They're essentially advertising against one of the their customers and for a long time a decentish chunk of their revenue.
 
That's pure ignorance. Intel has been reporting record revenues and profits quarter after quarter. I guess Intel and Apple are both dying then.

This article is an interesting read.


At its best, the x86 market is a 330-350m a year in total shipments for client and server CPUs. Arguably, only a small fraction of that market sells at premium price points necessary to justify the investment in cutting edge process technology. Once upon a time, Intel was increasing their CapEx annually and roughly every 18-24 months, building out a new foundry for cutting edge process. As the PC market matured and refresh rates dramatically slowed, it made it harder for Intel to justify the CapEx for leading-edge nodes on a two-year cycle, and thus they moved more to a 3.5 to a four-year cycle.

Basically, the problem seems to be that Intel’s addressable market is shrinking year after year, in part due to slow refresh cycles amongst PCs. Intel is making money not so much because they are selling more chips, but because they are spending less on R&D.

And now they have lost Apple as a customer.

It doesn’t take a genius to see how this poses a problem for Intel in the long run. How long do you think Intel can keep pushing the same incremental updates to their designs and expect people to keep buying them when Macs continues to leapfrog them in performance and (soon) price?
 
>"Only a PC offers tablet mode, touch screen and stylus capabilities in a single device,"

Soooo... a tablet then? How does an iPad not offer tablet mode, touch screen and stylus capabilities?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Intel lools pretty desperate. Remember the old adage “don’t let them see you sweat”? Call us fanboys on this forum, but if I can take an average desktop or laptop buyer and in 30 minutes show them the advantages of M1 over Intel they might not immediately switch platforms but they will almost certainly be impressed. Apple has hit a home run and even Intel knows it.
It’s an impressive developmen. Man 20 hr battery life s unreal but the performance to boot, wish I could have waited and delayed buying my 16 inch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Intel is making record revenues and profits. What’s your definition of "struggling"?
I would say they are falling behind in tech , they have fierce competition coming from once partners (see Apple , Microsoft rumored to be soon a CPU maker , Amazon) , new competition is coming in Qualcomm after buying Nuvia and Nvidia after buying ARM , TSMC basically won the race for the foreseeable future , in X86 AMD are murdering them in design.

Now , can they still get it together and leapfrom everyone ? sure , but they lost a TON of their best engineers to all of those companies due to subpar pay as they were basically the biggest game in town for a long time , and as they are not the clear leaders anymore with bigger companies coming to play in their backyard , they wont be getting those 60% margines anymore , prices will go down (good for us!) if they want to stay competitive as they are not #1 in the tech side to command the high prices.

Thats my take on that.
 
thats interesting
one is comparing a brand new processor against 2-years old processors
the other compares os-features, not explaining the advantages of thunderbolt-4 and m.2 pcie-4
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
This reminds me when Blackberry made fun of the iPhone. Intel must be really terrified, since ARM-based Apple Silicon trounces Intel x86. Both Intel and AMD should move to ARM. There is no other way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
The Apple Silicon architecture is a Best Fit for the MacBook Air.

Apple can go up a-little (various MacBook Pro models) & down-alittle (a lower-end MacBook Air model) from there, but NOT much in either direction.

Anything more than that is just Tim Cook's Smoke & Mirrors / Dog & Pony Show marketing.
You will see a new Mac Pro in WWDC 2022, half the size of the current one and more powerful.
 
No Mac has a touch screen, this is true. But this has nothing to do with intel/ARM and personnally, I don't see the appeal of a touch screen on a device that has a keyboard and trackpad. The only use cases I see are: drawing and handwriting on screen, which I never do.
For every other interaction, you're better off with a trackpad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Living here in Portland and formerly knowing 2 engineers from Intel (one from France and the other England) I can say they’ve been struggling for many years with this. Of course you already know. Intel is huge to Oregon’s economy. Well, in 10 years it’s toast...
As an Oregonian, that leaves me with a feeling of foreboding…
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.