Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I really hope for you that you do not do this for a living. The UK, specially the UK, where until now every second iPad and other Apple stuff (ex iPhone) is brought in directly from the states, the UK, that has the highest quota of regular business and private travel between the two countries, the UK is going to be the last complaining about a product that allows them finally to roam on both continents with speed.
What in your opinion would have been gained to install a LTE chip that will support the non existing british networks (that the frequencies and bands are not even known until next year seems to be a meer technicallity as well) that will not work in britons favorite travel destination?
Fact remains, the new iPad IS supporting LTE 4G. It is NOT supporting it in the UK but then, no device is, because IT DOES NOT EXIST.

I haven't for a moment suggested that they should have included an 800/2600MHz LTE Chip. In fact, I've argued that it wouldn't make sense to sell a separate model in the EU due to the immature nature of most EU Member State's 4G Deployments. What we do know is that UK Networks (with the possible exception of "Everything Everywhere") will follow the EU Guideline to allocate 800/2600MHz as the Standard LTE Spectrum. Trials are happening and the Licenses will be purchased at auction sometime after Analogue Television signals finally die in April with initial LTE Deployments being switched-on before the end of this year and yet still...I don't care one bit whether Apple supports these standards.

What I do care about is being lied to. A device that cannot support 4G outside of America is not 4G to any non-American and should not be sold as such. At best it's misleading, at worst disingenuous, and local law (meaning EU Law) supports the consumer in this regard. The device should be sold without "4G" being thrust to the forefront in available descriptions.

In the 80s/90s, A "Foreign" (to the US) Manufacturer wouldn't have sold an American a Television claiming it had the "Feature" of Higher Resolution than any other television sold in the US on the off-chance that they might lug that television to another country and take advantage of PAL Broadcasts.

European cars sold in America tend to be poor cousins of their European counterparts, simply because Europe standardises on much higher Octane fuel (typically "Premium"/"Super Unleaded" (97 RON) is the LOWEST rated fuel with 95 RON being the EU Legal Minimum). We insist that for use in the US, users utilise only the highest Octane fuels OR convert the cars (or manufacture them especially) to accept the "dirtier" fuels in North America/Australasia. What the likes of VW & BMW don't then do in their marketing for converted cars is quote the EU Figures for Acceleration and BHP etc. because these would be outright lies as any Turbochargers simply wouldn't work as well with US gas.

It's just common sense, a Product should not have a feature so pre-eminently championed in it's marketing that is so severely tied to being in another geographical region outside your own.

PS. The vast majority of travel by UK Nationals is to EU Member States where we have freedom of movement across borders to live & work. I don't know where you obtained your data, but it probably has something to do with London Heathrow Airport acting as something of a Hub Airport into Europe for flights of Trans-Atlantic Origin.

I also severely doubt that 1 in 2 iPads sold in the UK ship from the US. The benefits of a favourable exchange rate are obliterated by the Sales/Import taxes involved, the additional power converter purchase required to utilise 230/240V Electrical Sockets, and the inconvenience of the time taken to make the delivery. We're certainly characteristically a frugal culture, but we're not THAT cheap!
 
I saw Bigfoot stomping through the woods one day too...

I think that you are intentionally trying to be obtuse. There is no reason that I can see for your lack of comprehension.

How original. Unless you're a shareholder I feel kind of sorry for you, defending a corporation sad. Mark my words, the EU will react and it won't be in Apples' favor.
 
Explained, sure, but solved? Hardly. All that article concludes is that US customers wont know the difference because their LTE is so crappy anyways
LTE is suddenly very good in select US markets. Even the burg I live near has excellent Verizon LTE coverage.

What in your opinion would have been gained to install a LTE chip that will support the non existing british networks (that the frequencies and bands are not even known until next year seems to be a meer technicallity as well) that will not work in britons favorite travel destination?
Fact remains, the new iPad IS supporting LTE 4G. It is NOT supporting it in the UK but then, no device is, because IT DOES NOT EXIST.
And the planned Qualcomm chip to support all LTE bands (including some that, as you point out, don't exist IRL yet) won't begin shipping engineering samples until the end of 2012.
 
How original. Unless you're a shareholder I feel kind of sorry for you, defending a corporation sad. Mark my words, the EU will react and it won't be in Apples' favor.

What's truly said is that you even when presented with facts you rather have your own special version of the facts. The EU will not bother with this because (and I'll go slow for you):
1. There are many different version of LTE. Which one would you like them to make work for you?
2. See number 1.
3. See number 2.

You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. Prove with a picture that Apple changed the website, and you might have a point, but you can't so your argument is moot and the obtuse comment is sound. I feel sorry for those who actually have to put up with you. That is really the sad part.

----------

@inxu,

Spoke to a friend working with Sonera in the network planning section. They will bid on the 800Mhz spectrum in a few months to a year. Soooooo this point will be moot in a few years.
 
Hey people, if you live in the UK and really feel you've been mis-sold to, then it's very easy to complain to the Advertising Standards Authority online. Someone has posted the link elsewhere in the thread but hear it is again:

http://www.asa.org.uk/Complaints/How-to-complain/Online-Form/Step1.aspx

If enough people do it, then maybe some customers can avoid being let down in the future.

And just how did Apple defraud you? Exactly. What did they say they would deliver and then reneged on?
 
The latest official figures (2009) show that the USA was only fourth on the list of British holiday destinations, with about 3m visits by people from the UK.

Spain had almost 12m visits, France almost 10m, and Ireland about 3.5m. Italy, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal and Turkey each had around 2m.

So that means about 37.5m holiday visits were made to countries where Britons could not and could never use the so-called iPad 4G, and about 3m were made to one where they could. Just for your info.

Well, I was really referring to business trips, but thats besides the point. The point is, that in Europe (I did include that for the british traveler, as we speak about European networks) the humble Briton CAN use his new shiny iPad, exactly because it is supporting the fastest networks around with up to 42Mbs. Here in Spain Vodafone and Movistar, the two major providers, got a very well functioning 42Mbs network up and running, the two smaller networks, Orange and Yoigo, still top out at "only" 21Mbs, still twice as fast as LTE in the States.

The point I am making is, that with the inclusion of the US LTE chip you get the best of both worlds. If you leave out LTE it will not work well or comparable to Europe in the States.
If you include a Euro LTE chip, it would also not work in the States and you have no advantage what so ever in Europe either. Only higher battery use and way higher costs in the few enclaves where you get LTE at all.

So, if you travel and want high speed, the new iPad ist the best gadget around. If you do not travel and want the highest speed, the new iPad is the best gadget around. No matter where you are.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B179 Safari/7534.48.3)

Chlloret said:
immaculate said:
The latest official figures (2009) show that the USA was only fourth on the list of British holiday destinations, with about 3m visits by people from the UK.

Spain had almost 12m visits, France almost 10m, and Ireland about 3.5m. Italy, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal and Turkey each had around 2m.

So that means about 37.5m holiday visits were made to countries where Britons could not and could never use the so-called iPad 4G, and about 3m were made to one where they could. Just for your info.

Well, I was really referring to business trips, but thats besides the point. The point is, that in Europe (I did include that for the british traveler, as we speak about European networks) the humble Briton CAN use his new shiny iPad, exactly because it is supporting the fastest networks around with up to 42Mbs. Here in Spain Vodafone and Movistar, the two major providers, got a very well functioning 42Mbs network up and running, the two smaller networks, Orange and Yoigo, still top out at "only" 21Mbs, still twice as fast as LTE in the States.

The point I am making is, that with the inclusion of the US LTE chip you get the best of both worlds. If you leave out LTE it will not work well or comparable to Europe in the States.
If you include a Euro LTE chip, it would also not work in the States and you have no advantage what so ever in Europe either. Only higher battery use and way higher costs in the few enclaves where you get LTE at all.

So, if you travel and want high speed, the new iPad ist the best gadget around. If you do not travel and want the highest speed, the new iPad is the best gadget around. No matter where you are.

But is it 4G? (as implied)
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B179 Safari/7534.48.3)



But it's it 4G? (as implied)

Of course it is. Its slow in the States, its LTE, but the British call it 4G while the faster conection at home is classed as 3G.
Whatever, at the end it is the speed that counts and there the new iPad delivers.
The packaging says 4G and that is correct. If it is not available in your region, its hardly Apples fault. After all, they give you a FASTER conection, do you really want to insist on the slower standard because of advertizing?

----------

Orange & T-Mobile cleared to use 1800MHz LTE today, shame about iPad not being compatible :-(
http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/03/13/ofcom.oks.orange.t.mobile.lte.in.uk/

Great, they bring now a complete different frequency into play. So, neither the US devices or any future European devices will be compatible with everything anywhere. Cool. They will manufacture there own devices?

Well, they have a year to test, they optimistically hope to go live in 2013, lets see whats happened until then. Who knows, the Brits might find some obscure frequency nobody else is using yet, walky talkies anyone?
 
1. There are many different version of LTE. Which one would you like them to make work for you?

None of them. Of course Apple can't include chips that aren't available yet, or support LTE systems who's specifications haven't been decided yet.

...but if they can't do that then they shouldn't imply that they can by selling something called an "iPad with WiFi and 4G" in countries where they know damn well that their "4G" is incompatible with the 4G networks under development.

No feat of engineering required - just fix the box and the website. Call it the "iPad with WiFi and Mobile Broadband" and clearly explain what will work where in the product description (not the current ambiguous footnotes to the tech specs). Hype the "super fast 3G" in the UK blurb, not the 4G. They should have done that when they changed all the "$"s to "£"s, put the "u"s back in "colour" and threw in the reassuringly chunky 3-pin mains plugs.

"Future proofing" is a consideration when purchasing tech, you know, and I'd expect 3-4 years out a bit of premium kit like an iPad - even if a new model appears next year. There will be 4G networks in the UK in that time frame, and a product shouldn't be sold as "4G" if its not going to support them.
 
None of them. Of course Apple can't include chips that aren't available yet, or support LTE systems who's specifications haven't been decided yet.

...but if they can't do that then they shouldn't imply that they can by selling something called an "iPad with WiFi and 4G" in countries where they know damn well that their "4G" is incompatible with the 4G networks under development.

No feat of engineering required - just fix the box and the website. Call it the "iPad with WiFi and Mobile Broadband" and clearly explain what will work where in the product description (not the current ambiguous footnotes to the tech specs). Hype the "super fast 3G" in the UK blurb, not the 4G. They should have done that when they changed all the "$"s to "£"s, put the "u"s back in "colour" and threw in the reassuringly chunky 3-pin mains plugs.

"Future proofing" is a consideration when purchasing tech, you know, and I'd expect 3-4 years out a bit of premium kit like an iPad - even if a new model appears next year. There will be 4G networks in the UK in that time frame, and a product shouldn't be sold as "4G" if its not going to support them.

Totally agree you've hit the nail on the head.
 
Orange & T-Mobile cleared to use 1800MHz LTE today, shame about iPad not being compatible :-(
http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/03/13/ofcom.oks.orange.t.mobile.lte.in.uk/

It isn't going to go live for another year. By then, there will be better LTE chipsets and radios out there for Apple, and anyone else, to use. Apple appears to be moving very deliberately when it comes to LTE. Theoretically, they could have released an LTE iPhone 4s last year, since AT&T and Verizon had it working in some parts of the country (particularly Verizon). However, it would be too big a drain on the battery life (there isn't room to increase the battery size on the 4S by as big a percentage as they did with the new iPad), and AT&T's network just hadn't been built out enough for the lack of LTE to cost it much in sales. Now AT&T and Verizon are reaching critical mass. By this time next year, so will more markets in Europe.

But, in the meantime, those of you in Europe still get "3G" data that is just as fast as our "4G" in the real world, and for the most part it is cheaper for you, too. And you'll likely get better battery life than those of us using LTE to get the same speeds.
 
Great, they bring now a complete different frequency into play. So, neither the US devices or any future European devices will be compatible with everything anywhere. Cool. They will manufacture there own devices?

LTE spectrum use is already absurdly complicated.

The US's LTE band use includes 4 separate bands in the 700 range in addition to the 850, 1700, 1900, 2100, and 2500 bands. I believe Canada is also using the former two frequency ranges.

Internationally, the 800, 1800, and 2600 bands seem to be the most common.

I can understand why Apple doesn't have support for Europe's LTE yet, considering it's not deployed yet in some places and its spectrum isn't finalized in some others yet either.

No, but the next generation chips (MDM9615 and MDM9215) support all LTE bands.

IIRC, the problem isn't the chipset, the problem is the antenna.
 
IIRC, the problem isn't the chipset, the problem is the antenna.

I think it's a matter of both. AnandTech pointed out that iPad isn't using the MDM9615, but rather than MDM9600 series. Also, antenna support is needed. LTE has brought a common standard, but unfortunately, a plethora of frequencies.
 
None of them. Of course Apple can't include chips that aren't available yet, or support LTE systems who's specifications haven't been decided yet.

...but if they can't do that then they shouldn't imply that they can by selling something called an "iPad with WiFi and 4G" in countries where they know damn well that their "4G" is incompatible with the 4G networks under development.

No feat of engineering required - just fix the box and the website. Call it the "iPad with WiFi and Mobile Broadband" and clearly explain what will work where in the product description (not the current ambiguous footnotes to the tech specs). Hype the "super fast 3G" in the UK blurb, not the 4G. They should have done that when they changed all the "$"s to "£"s, put the "u"s back in "colour" and threw in the reassuringly chunky 3-pin mains plugs.

"Future proofing" is a consideration when purchasing tech, you know, and I'd expect 3-4 years out a bit of premium kit like an iPad - even if a new model appears next year. There will be 4G networks in the UK in that time frame, and a product shouldn't be sold as "4G" if its not going to support them.

I don't agree that fixing the box and websites is enough. People who buy the Wifi + 4G in Europe are paying extra for LTE tech that is useless in Europe. Apple need to come out with either a Wifi + 3G or a Wifi + LTE 800/2600 for European use.
 
I don't agree that fixing the box and websites is enough. People who buy the Wifi + 4G in Europe are paying extra for LTE tech that is useless in Europe. Apple need to come out with either a Wifi + 3G or a Wifi + LTE 800/2600 for European use.

There is a WiFi+3G. It is the WiFi+4G model, which also includes DC-HSDPA and HSPA+. Why would you want a version that is otherwise identical to the one they are selling but omits the North America LTE? If you don't need it, it won't be on. If you do travel stateside, you'll be able to get LTE from AT&T during your stay. It isn't as if Apple would charge any less for a WiFi+3G-only version.
 
Orange & T-Mobile cleared to use 1800MHz LTE today, shame about iPad not being compatible :-(
http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/03/13/ofcom.oks.orange.t.mobile.lte.in.uk/
Did you miss the salient part of the article?

The first British LTE networks are expected to go live in 2013.

I'd bet next year's iPad (4th generation) will support the common European LTE bands when it's released, assuming Orange and T-Mob actually get around to building out their networks by then...
 
Last edited:
None of them. Of course Apple can't include chips that aren't available yet, or support LTE systems who's specifications haven't been decided yet.

...but if they can't do that then they shouldn't imply that they can by selling something called an "iPad with WiFi and 4G" in countries where they know damn well that their "4G" is incompatible with the 4G networks under development.

No feat of engineering required - just fix the box and the website. Call it the "iPad with WiFi and Mobile Broadband" and clearly explain what will work where in the product description (not the current ambiguous footnotes to the tech specs). Hype the "super fast 3G" in the UK blurb, not the 4G. They should have done that when they changed all the "$"s to "£"s, put the "u"s back in "colour" and threw in the reassuringly chunky 3-pin mains plugs.

"Future proofing" is a consideration when purchasing tech, you know, and I'd expect 3-4 years out a bit of premium kit like an iPad - even if a new model appears next year. There will be 4G networks in the UK in that time frame, and a product shouldn't be sold as "4G" if its not going to support them.

Apple did not deceive anyone as much as you want to believe it. They wrote on the box that this device will work on various network to include LTE, but maybe not your version of LTE (paraphrase). How hard is that to understand? Should the people in the US complain that they can't use the DC-HSPA+ networks even though it is written on the box? Also, who wants to keep an iPad for 3 to 4 years? Really? Sorry but you are wrong and you just want something to complain about.

----------

It isn't going to go live for another year. By then, there will be better LTE chipsets and radios out there for Apple, and anyone else, to use. Apple appears to be moving very deliberately when it comes to LTE. Theoretically, they could have released an LTE iPhone 4s last year, since AT&T and Verizon had it working in some parts of the country (particularly Verizon). However, it would be too big a drain on the battery life (there isn't room to increase the battery size on the 4S by as big a percentage as they did with the new iPad), and AT&T's network just hadn't been built out enough for the lack of LTE to cost it much in sales. Now AT&T and Verizon are reaching critical mass. By this time next year, so will more markets in Europe.

But, in the meantime, those of you in Europe still get "3G" data that is just as fast as our "4G" in the real world, and for the most part it is cheaper for you, too. And you'll likely get better battery life than those of us using LTE to get the same speeds.

Stop, stop, stop. You are making too much sense and presenting totally cogent arguments. Some here simply can't be burdened with the facts so let them wallow in their own jaded OPINIONS... Apple did not lie to anyone but they better dumb down their advertising to the least common denominator because it is clear that some people simply do not have the capacity to read and comprehend.

----------

I don't agree that fixing the box and websites is enough. People who buy the Wifi + 4G in Europe are paying extra for LTE tech that is useless in Europe. Apple need to come out with either a Wifi + 3G or a Wifi + LTE 800/2600 for European use.

And people in the US are paying for technology that is useless in the US. Is it really that hard for you to understand? Really?

----------

There is a WiFi+3G. It is the WiFi+4G model, which also includes DC-HSDPA and HSPA+. Why would you want a version that is otherwise identical to the one they are selling but omits the North America LTE? If you don't need it, it won't be on. If you do travel stateside, you'll be able to get LTE from AT&T during your stay. It isn't as if Apple would charge any less for a WiFi+3G-only version.

Have you figured it out yet that you are arguing a losing cause on people who simply can't comprehend facts even when they are written down? Let them whine and complain...

The simple thing to do is: DON'T BUY AN iPAD..... There problem solved. Complaint and whining factor reset to zero until the next iPad is announced.
 
Last edited:
Should the people in the US complain that they can't use the DC-HSPA+ networks even though it is written on the box?

Imagine for a second Apple was a UK Company and had released a device in the US that was capable of supporting the EU's 800/2600Mhz 4G LTE networks (for when they roll out) but not US 4G frequencies.

Now imagine they were calling that device "The New iPad - WiFi + 4G" on all of their marketing material.

Would you not have a right to reasonably expect (without drilling into the small-print, spec-sheets and reading 3rd Party Tech Sites) that the device you were purchasing would support your version of 4G?

As I've stated previously, I don't have a problem with the product. I have a problem with misleading advertising.

And with regards to your assertion that nobody would have a use for a current generation iPad in 3-4 years...You're a misguided slave to Capitalism & fodder for purveyors of products with built-in obsolescence (like many of us), but there is no need to shout about it, or to criticise people who expect (reasonably) for their technology purchases to be relevant for more than 5mins and certainly to contain a feature THAT IS MENTIONED IN THE NAME OF THE PRODUCT
 
Imagine for a second Apple was a UK Company and had released a device in the US that was capable of supporting the EU's 800/2600Mhz 4G LTE networks (for when they roll out) but not US 4G frequencies.

Now imagine they were calling that device "The New iPad - WiFi + 4G" on all of their marketing material.

Would you not have a right to reasonably expect (without drilling into the small-print, spec-sheets and reading 3rd Party Tech Sites) that the device you were purchasing would support your version of 4G?

As I've stated previously, I don't have a problem with the product. I have a problem with misleading advertising.

And with regards to your assertion that nobody would have a use for a current generation iPad in 3-4 years...You're a misguided slave to Capitalism & fodder for purveyors of products with built-in obsolescence (like many of us), but there is no need to shout about it, or to criticise people who expect (reasonably) for their technology purchases to be relevant for more than 5mins and certainly to contain a feature THAT IS MENTIONED IN THE NAME OF THE PRODUCT


Drill down? What are you talking about? It is right there on the site, listed on the tech specs page. They didn't hide anything or make it difficult to find. For your edification, I took the liberty of taking all of 5 seconds and finding and posting the info for you: ** Wi-Fi + 4G for AT&T model: 4G LTE (700, 2100 MHz)3; UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)(3) **

(3)4G LTE is supported only on AT&T and Verizon networks in the U.S. and on Bell, Rogers, and Telus networks in Canada. See your carrier for details.
Cellular data plan is sold separately.

(4)The iPad with Wi-Fi + 4G model you purchase is configured to work with a particular cellular network technology. Check with your carrier for compatibility and cellular data plan availability.


None of this was hard to find or deceptive. If this is too hard to comprehend, then maybe the iPad is too complicated as well. Stick to pens and paper as your tablet experience. As for your analogy, I might be disappointed that my country didn't support a specific frequency but I would not say that Apple was deceptive. I tend to read before I purchase or complain about something. Second, I can make any assertion I want about what will and will not be useful in 3 to 4 years just as well as the OP.

Clear enough for ya?

BTW... Don't like the new iPad, then don't buy one... Another problem solved....
 
I don't agree that fixing the box and websites is enough. People who buy the Wifi + 4G in Europe are paying extra for LTE tech that is useless in Europe. Apple need to come out with either a Wifi + 3G or a Wifi + LTE 800/2600 for European use.

Or you can look at it another way.

The price of the new ipad is exactly the same as the ipad2, which supports 3G (but not 4G).

So you can choose to interpret it as paying for wifi+3g. If it can support your country's 4G, then good for you, treat it as a bonus. Else, you have not really lost out in any way, as you would still be able to access mobile broadband, albeit at a slower rate (and at a lower subscription rate). :)

I feel that having 3 versions (wifi only, with 3g or 4g) is simply going to complicate matters more, and either way, the savings from opting to go 3g only instead of 4g would be minimal at best that I would probably be indifferent between choosing either.

I ordered the 4g version knowing fully well it will not be supported in my country, but knowing that the nature of my usage would require 3g connectivity. I don't see why I should feel cheated...:confused:
 
Clear enough for ya?

No.

Ignoring the fact that you're quoting the Small Print from the US Website (which is quite different to ours here in the UK (which makes no reference to the carriers)) Are you seriously suggesting that everyone who walks into an Apple Store or who visits Apple.com needs to have an intricate knowledge of the nuances of international LTE Spectrum Standards before buying an iPad?

To 99% of people who buy one...this:

4G LTE (700, 2100 MHz)3; UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

Might as well be this:

!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+

The Law in this country thankfully supports me on this and caveats or no caveats, they will judge this to be misleading. All that matters is that the product is called "The New iPad - WiFi + 4G", and to most intents and purposes outside of North America, it isn't 4G.
 
No.

Ignoring the fact that you're quoting the Small Print from the US Website (which is quite different to ours here in the UK (which makes no reference to the carriers)) Are you seriously suggesting that everyone who walks into an Apple Store or who visits Apple.com needs to have an intricate knowledge of the nuances of international LTE Spectrum Standards before buying an iPad?

To 99% of people who buy one...this:

4G LTE (700, 2100 MHz)3; UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

Might as well be this:

!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+

The Law in this country thankfully supports me on this and caveats or no caveats, they will judge this to be misleading. All that matters is that the product is called "The New iPad - WiFi + 4G", and to most intents and purposes outside of North America, it isn't 4G.

Again, you are mixing apples (no pun I assure you) and oranges. 4G has been equated to LTE which is also viewed as DC-HSPA+ (or even HSPA). Your argument is with the ITU-T who made the classification of the standard. As for being fine print, are you still going to cling to the fact that it is not hidden on the website, in plain view, easy to ready, doesn't require Google Translate, or anything to make it understandable. By the way, the supplied link is from the UK website, either you have a reading comprehension problem or you are not being truthful: http://www.apple.com/uk/ipad/specs/. Notice the little (3), and (4)...Almost verbatim minus the reference to the Verizon network.
 
No.

Ignoring the fact that you're quoting the Small Print from the US Website (which is quite different to ours here in the UK (which makes no reference to the carriers)) Are you seriously suggesting that everyone who walks into an Apple Store or who visits Apple.com needs to have an intricate knowledge of the nuances of international LTE Spectrum Standards before buying an iPad?

To 99% of people who buy one...this:

4G LTE (700, 2100 MHz)3; UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

Might as well be this:

!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+!"£$%^&*()_+

The Law in this country thankfully supports me on this and caveats or no caveats, they will judge this to be misleading. All that matters is that the product is called "The New iPad - WiFi + 4G", and to most intents and purposes outside of North America, it isn't 4G.

Good luck. Apple did not break the law in any way shape or form. It is clearly explained on the website and thats the only way it could be ordered by now. And yes, even on the UK site it specificly names the providers ATT and Verizon as well as Canadian providers.
And when it will be on sale from Friday in the shop, you can be sure that, if you ask, the Apple genius will tell you that no, you can not conect in the UK to a non existing network but yes, you CAN conect to a far faster network then the US 4G.
It is simply not possible to be cheated here because of the number 4 on the pack. People that know about it, the geeks and nerds, know everything about it und make there decission to buy the device for sure not based on a pack or advert, people who do not about the technology get the best and fastest mobile device around for there country and there existing networks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.