Its not. A product that costs £1149 and is visually bothering me is not silly. Its a valid reason.Seems a bit silly, but whatever works for you.
Why paying so much money for a product that is going to bother you?
Its not. A product that costs £1149 and is visually bothering me is not silly. Its a valid reason.Seems a bit silly, but whatever works for you.
Its not. A product that costs £1149 and is visually bothering me is not silly. Its a valid reason.
Why paying so much money for a product that is going to bother you?
You could turn it off—perhaps not what you’d prefer, but I finally had to turn off my husband’s ID on his Ipad as it continued to give him issues (touch ID)
I'm willing to bet they'll call it the iPad X.
The same way people hold their ipads today. Realticaly nothing will change, palm rejection is good and most of the time people have their ipads in cases or use a typ if smart cover for holding or placing on a flat surface. The “holding ipad” argument is getting old.How are you supposed to hold an iPad that looks like one in the mock-up? You can't hold an iPad like a phone with your fingers wrapped around the sides.
The same way people hold their ipads today. Realticaly nothing will change, palm rejection is good and most of the time people have their ipads in cases or use a typ if smart cover for holding or placing on a flat surface. The “holding ipad” argument is getting old.
Also with ios11, i have used the home button maybe 1% in the beginning and now dont even use it. Glad to see apple moving forward without the homebutton. I am pretty excited for this years ipad.
It has this thing called palm rejection. A iOS device knows when your palm or thumb it just resting on the screen to hold the device and rejects its inputs.
As someone that is firmly in the notch-hating group, I hope this doesn't happen to the iPad too. Leave a bit of bezel at the top for the sensors to hide.
As someone that is firmly in the notch-hating group, I hope this doesn't happen to the iPad too. Leave a bit of bezel at the top for the sensors to hide.
Please no. That mock-up with the notch looks so ridiculous.
Apple should just wait for under-glass finger print readers to hit production. A pretty good one was showcased at CES. There’s really no need for FaceID on the iPad, or the notch for that matter. It’s okay to have some bezel for such a large screen!
If Apple doesn't allow multiple faces on the iPad, it will be a fail decision.iPad has never been touted Apple has a multi-user device, otherwise we would have such features in software by now.
As long as there is a front facing camera there will be some type of notch. Unless of course you make the bezel bigger in which case Face ID doesn't really make a difference.Please no. That mock-up with the notch looks so ridiculous.
Apple should just wait for under-glass finger print readers to hit production. A pretty good one was showcased at CES. There’s really no need for FaceID on the iPad, or the notch for that matter. It’s okay to have some bezel for such a large screen!
With a price bet. $1,499 and $1,799. I don’t think you’re hoping for that.I hope there is an OLED iPad in 2018
TrueDepth system might add $50 but since it’s a technology Apple wants to proliferate, they might eat it.Let me guess, the base price for a "modern iPad" will be at least $2,000?