Exactly... Plus, I need access to energy when I need access to it. I already try to do things like washing and drying clothes in the evening, after "peak" usage periods are over. But generally, I'm not going to inconvenience myself by not getting tasks done when I've got the free time to do them, just because some energy graph tells me it would be more "environmentally friendly" to postpone them.For perspective, it costs less than $1/yr to charge your iPhone.
You don't need to know anything. The service knows your location and your local provider. After that it can look up what the current generation mix is. It can then calculate what the mix is from available sources.I still don’t understand how this is supposed to work like how do you even know where your electricity is coming from unless you have your own solar on the roof
Apple, IF you are THAT concerned about electricity usage STOP offering WIRELESS charging!
wireless charging is so much less energy efficient vs plugging in ...
and I almost always charge overnight when renewables (solar, wind ...) are not available ...
It can and does - certain solar/battery products will top up the battery when energy prices are low and release electricity when the price is higher.
Some system will turn on your EV charger when grid prices are low.
Hmm, I'll have to see if my state has something like this. It won't really affect how I do things, I just find it odd that in an area completely powered by "clean" energy...this doesn't reflect that.so for example in California, there is the CA ISO and they can provide you to the minute where the power in CA is coming from, they have a public website for that.
Came here to say something similarMother Nature is pleased
I was not going to get into the efficiency of MagSafe vs Qi, merely pointing out that wireless in general if quite a bit less efficient, MagSafe by at least 10-15% whereas Qi is at least 20% ...compared to wired.I would not have survived with an iPhone the past 5 years without Qi charging. The Lightning connector on my 3 separate iPhones has failed me miserably, and I'm not rough with my phones. No idea why I had such bad luck with Lightning, but I charge my iPhone 13 Pro using only Qi charging now. I never connect a cable because it wouldn't work even if I tried. USB-C could not have come soon enough, and I used to be a huge Lightning advocate. Just a faulty connector design, unfortunately.
What's missing in your argument is that Apple is about pushing technology forward. Sure, Qi charging may be less efficient, but Apple's mission is to make it more efficient. The use of magnets allows for a perfect alignment, reducing energy loss. Apple actually donated MagSafe to the next major version of Qi, so now it will become standard across the industry.
![]()
Qi2: how Apple might finally harness MagSafe by giving it away
MagSafe is coming to Android — kinda?www.theverge.com
Its asia and US FYIWill this be used in Asia and Africa, the two biggest polluters on the planet and have the nine most polluted rivers on the planet?
It would be even more pleased if Tim and his billionaire buddies didn’t all have a carbon footprint of a small city.Came here to say something similar![]()
Yup. LOVE your quote btw)It would be even more pleased if Tim and his billionaire buddies didn’t all have a carbon footprint of a small city.
...
If this is a real concern for the public utilities? They can incentivize behaviors by giving people discounted rates during the preferred times to use power.
Hey I never claimed to have good jokes…you forgot bundles of wires that those magnets interact with
It makes perfect sense.really? gonna disable from day one, makes no sense to me
It’s amazing how elites with gargantuan carbon footprints were able to convince large numbers of gullible sheep that they urgently need to eat crickets while taking a cold shower. They even fly private jets to various “climate” summits and the drones still eat it up, quite jaw dropping really.All this brainwashing BS
Nature thrives on what they try to eliminate...
It’s called Freedom of Conscience.Of course there would be people against that