Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?
Lol I know. This will never be good, not while Federeigh is thereYou think they will master this in 19, after their track record with Siri.
Even if it’s coming in 18.4, that’s going to be released in April, that’s 7 months after launch.We should wait until the beta drops before assuming it isn't coming until 18.5 beta.
I would too but it’s the only reasonable high end phone with at least some privacy features in mindOh well im finally at the point where im ready to leave apple behind. Since the first iPhone I never had anything else, but apple keeps on disappointing. Additionally their decisions lately don’t play well with me…
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they purchase Siri from an independent company and integrate it?
Ahem - I think the valuation is around $3 trillion now.Love the folks who say "Apple needs to (insert advice here)". Going to tell a trillion dollar company what they need to do.
I would too but it’s the only reasonable high end phone with at least some privacy features in mind
Objectively true. Sadly.I'd say Siri was better when Apple purchased the company, and it has only gotten worse since.
My S25 Ultra DOES on device processing thoughThat’s because unlike Samsung, Apple wants this and other AI functionality to process locally and not have to transfer to a server in the cloud.
Honestly, Apple needs to stop with the "annual hard release date for major iOS iteration" thing and just move to rolling incremental updates when things are actually ready and not tied to a fake date on the calendar. The software release announcements are very much becoming "over promise and under deliver" and they need to do the opposite.
Well said. Stability and bug fixes don't touch the circle of shareholder value on Apple's venn diagram. It can be beneficial when customer interests dovetail with corporate initiatives and priorities but this hasn't been the case with Apple for some time. They do what they need to do to make the money machine go brrrrrrWhile I agree with you, money rules all and there's just too much money in the annual release show. Personally, I'd like a year (or two) focused on "just works" bug fixes and refinements... kind of a Snow Leopard-like proposition again. But rolling out visible gimmicks etc. stirs up more money than fixing bugs in stuff already sold. 💰💰💰
Well, Apple did ignore the new team from Siri Technology, refused to implement their suggestions, refused to allocate money, and the significant Siri Technologies staff all quit as soon as their contract allowed. Might have something to do with the lack of evolution.Correct. Siri technology and Siri, Inc. were engineered and co-founded by Stanford Research Institute cohorts Adam Cheyer, Dag Kittlaus, and Tom Gruber.
They launched Siri on the App Store in February 2010, and within a few weeks Steve Jobs personally called them to make an offer for the company. It was sold in April 2010 for more than $200 million.
Reportedly the underlying technology was in development long before the iPhone even shipped in 2007, so it's understandable that there's a lot of technical debt in there. That might explain why it's been slow to evolve and integrate GenAI features today.
Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?
Unlikely... because A.I. is Wall Street HOT right now and the money is all that matters. Instead, they'll finish this A.I. foundational work and then integrate it into up to all of the Apple apps making it towards essential to turn "ON"... like altering the file storage format when in macOS generational changes as part of the method to motivate people to install the new macOS versions (so they can open a file touched by someone on an updated Mac).
The choice of "OFF" is likely only short-term.
Just today, with intelligence enabled in my iPhone 16 Pro, I asked Siri to look something up on the web which yielded this:
View attachment 2483198
Pretty sure that the “i” in iPhone stands for Internet…Yet this thing in 2025 tells me that it doesn’t see an app called Web.
F F S
Until proven otherwise.My S25 Ultra DOES on device processing though
Do you know what the customer interests of billions of iPhone users are? Or just your own priorities and those of MR posters?Well said. Stability and bug fixes don't touch the circle of shareholder value on Apple's venn diagram. It can be beneficial when customer interests dovetail with corporate initiatives and priorities but this hasn't been the case with Apple for some time. They do what they need to do to make the money machine go brrrrrr
Well, the real question is why is AI Siri worse then old one? I mean back in a day it could at least sometimes have it right but now it’s disaster.Except Siri never got better, almost like Apple forgot about making it better. After all these years, Siri is embarrassingly bad. Apple doesn't seem to know how to make AI work.