Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dricci and Razorpit
Oh well im finally at the point where im ready to leave apple behind. Since the first iPhone I never had anything else, but apple keeps on disappointing. Additionally their decisions lately don’t play well with me…
I would too but it’s the only reasonable high end phone with at least some privacy features in mind
 
Take your time and make sure you get it right, Apple. Focus on quality, not rushing out features according to a marketing schedule.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they purchase Siri from an independent company and integrate it?

Correct. Siri technology and Siri, Inc. were engineered and co-founded by Stanford Research Institute cohorts Adam Cheyer, Dag Kittlaus, and Tom Gruber.

They launched Siri on the App Store in February 2010, and within a few weeks Steve Jobs personally called them to make an offer for the company. It was sold in April 2010 for more than $200 million.

Reportedly the underlying technology was in development long before the iPhone even shipped in 2007, so it's understandable that there's a lot of technical debt in there. That might explain why it's been slow to evolve and integrate GenAI features today.
 
This is what happens when you let marketing people take over the business.

A few emojis here, a new color there, 2mpx more, a control centre that is just more cluttered, bugs and issues all over the place due to ridiculous timelines…

Sooner or later they will hit a wall.. it’s just matter of time
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect and nt5672
I was high on Apple's AI announcement, thinking it would be just right for the average user. But that was before I'd had much experience with the various LLM's out now. For the past several months I've had need to familiarize myself with what is really happening in the AI world...

Apple is not even in the game really. None of these offerings do much of anything useful, and there are significantly better tools available on the iPhone than what Apple is offering.

Apple and AI are dead in the water for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chungry
Just today, with intelligence enabled in my iPhone 16 Pro, I asked Siri to look something up on the web which yielded this:
IMG_8698.jpeg


Pretty sure that the “i” in iPhone stands for Internet…Yet this thing in 2025 tells me that it doesn’t see an app called Web.

F F S
 
I would too but it’s the only reasonable high end phone with at least some privacy features in mind

Well, after Apple betrayed their support for minorities and every value they have been promoting in their ads for the last decade by climbing up Elons ass, I no longer believe in their privacy promises either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chungry
Honestly, Apple needs to stop with the "annual hard release date for major iOS iteration" thing and just move to rolling incremental updates when things are actually ready and not tied to a fake date on the calendar. The software release announcements are very much becoming "over promise and under deliver" and they need to do the opposite.

While I agree with you, money rules all and there's just too much money in the annual release show. Personally, I'd like a year (or two) focused on "just works" bug fixes and refinements... kind of a Snow Leopard-like proposition again. But rolling out visible gimmicks etc. stirs up more money than fixing bugs in stuff already sold. 💰💰💰
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chungry
I have really enjoyed the Apple Intelligence features introduced so far and I'm looking forward to what's coming. Integrating Siri with ChatGPT has been really nice as well. I use Siri constantly both at home and on my mobile devices. Friends who upgraded are also enjoying it. Perhaps the higher-end tech folks are disappointed, but the customers who make up most of Apple's sales are likely pretty happy with it all.
 
  • Love
Reactions: surferfb
While I agree with you, money rules all and there's just too much money in the annual release show. Personally, I'd like a year (or two) focused on "just works" bug fixes and refinements... kind of a Snow Leopard-like proposition again. But rolling out visible gimmicks etc. stirs up more money than fixing bugs in stuff already sold. 💰💰💰
Well said. Stability and bug fixes don't touch the circle of shareholder value on Apple's venn diagram. It can be beneficial when customer interests dovetail with corporate initiatives and priorities but this hasn't been the case with Apple for some time. They do what they need to do to make the money machine go brrrrrr
 
Correct. Siri technology and Siri, Inc. were engineered and co-founded by Stanford Research Institute cohorts Adam Cheyer, Dag Kittlaus, and Tom Gruber.

They launched Siri on the App Store in February 2010, and within a few weeks Steve Jobs personally called them to make an offer for the company. It was sold in April 2010 for more than $200 million.

Reportedly the underlying technology was in development long before the iPhone even shipped in 2007, so it's understandable that there's a lot of technical debt in there. That might explain why it's been slow to evolve and integrate GenAI features today.
Well, Apple did ignore the new team from Siri Technology, refused to implement their suggestions, refused to allocate money, and the significant Siri Technologies staff all quit as soon as their contract allowed. Might have something to do with the lack of evolution.
 
Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?

Unlikely... because A.I. is Wall Street HOT right now and the money is all that matters. Instead, they'll finish this A.I. foundational work and then integrate it into up to all of the Apple apps making it towards essential to turn "ON"... like altering the file storage format in macOS generational changes as part of the method to motivate people to install the new macOS versions (so they can open a file touched by someone on an updated Mac). Open an iWork file on a newer version of macOS and then save it, then try to open it on an older version of macOS and it probably will NOT. To even USE Apple app files can "force" upgrades of macOS. What's to stop the same strategy from "forcing" A.I. "on"?

The choice of "OFF" is likely only short-term. IMO: in the next round or two, deep integration across Mac apps will basically force it "ON."
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: CoMoMacUser
Unlikely... because A.I. is Wall Street HOT right now and the money is all that matters. Instead, they'll finish this A.I. foundational work and then integrate it into up to all of the Apple apps making it towards essential to turn "ON"... like altering the file storage format when in macOS generational changes as part of the method to motivate people to install the new macOS versions (so they can open a file touched by someone on an updated Mac).

The choice of "OFF" is likely only short-term.

I hope it goes full server/net sooner rather than later (an Apple version) honestly

To me, the more voice assistant based things get, the more I want that to be fully accessible across a wide range of devices (like a cellular watch) and not be reliant on the "patio paver" in my pocket
 
Just today, with intelligence enabled in my iPhone 16 Pro, I asked Siri to look something up on the web which yielded this:
View attachment 2483198

Pretty sure that the “i” in iPhone stands for Internet…Yet this thing in 2025 tells me that it doesn’t see an app called Web.

F F S

Would it have been better if Siri said: "I don't know what you mean by look something up on the web. Here's what I found on the web for look something up on the web" ;)
 
Well said. Stability and bug fixes don't touch the circle of shareholder value on Apple's venn diagram. It can be beneficial when customer interests dovetail with corporate initiatives and priorities but this hasn't been the case with Apple for some time. They do what they need to do to make the money machine go brrrrrr
Do you know what the customer interests of billions of iPhone users are? Or just your own priorities and those of MR posters?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: rmadsen3
Except Siri never got better, almost like Apple forgot about making it better. After all these years, Siri is embarrassingly bad. Apple doesn't seem to know how to make AI work.
Well, the real question is why is AI Siri worse then old one? I mean back in a day it could at least sometimes have it right but now it’s disaster.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.