None of those are unique or interesting.View attachment 2483221
Ok so proven it is
None of those are unique or interesting.View attachment 2483221
Ok so proven it is
Do you know what the customer interests of billions of iPhone users are? Or just your own priorities and those of MR posters?
Me: Siri when is Apple Intelligence gonna work right?
Siri: Calling Mom
Mom has a better shot at giving you the correct answer.Me: Siri when is Apple Intelligence gonna work right?
Siri: Calling Mom
Appreciate the drive-by. I was asked to prove on-device was a thing on Samsung and I did grabbing a screenshot. I did not make nor did I imply any assertions other than that.None of those are unique or interesting.
I really was hoping for the promised AI features. I would have kept my 14 another yearIt’s going to be a year before they roll out all the features promised anyway so we haven’t gained much from an early release.
They’ve done it this way to appease the stock market rather than their customers.
None of those are unique or interesting.
Actually, you are "...missing a thing." You are just unaware of what you are missing, which is fine.You were silly enough to buy one. My iPhone 15 is still great. I’m not missing a thing.
I disagree. IMO Apple remains mostly not disappointing, despite some notable awfulnesses like killing MacProject and killing Aperture after enticing folks like me into building enterprise-critical workflows around Apple's apps.apple is one disappointment after the other these days, it wasn’t like this a few years ago.
I disagree. IMO Apple remains mostly not disappointing, despite some notable awfulnesses like killing MacProject and killing Aperture after enticing folks like me into building enterprise-critical workflows around Apple's apps.
IMO AI on or off is only temporary, perhaps while Apple figures out the current [IMO beta] clustermess. At some point soon AI will simply be transparently part of apps and the OS, on by default. At that point users that insist on no AI will pay a huge performance penalty.Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?
Miffed is a good word. I remain miffed about Aperture every day.I'm still miffed about Aperture -- good call Allen
Nah they can’t, privacy is a fundamental human right!!! 🤣Can Apple track how many users have AI turned off? If so, and if it's an amount that Apple finds worrisome, would that prompt them to rethink their AI strategy in terms of features and ROI?
Apple is very competent on skating the line between what's legal and what's misrepresented. Butterfly keyboards come to mind.Class action lawsuit should be considered for everyone that bought an iPhone 16 with the marketing being primarily “Hello, Apple Intelligence.” I would have never upgraded seeing we likely won’t get what was promised before WWDC 2025 or in worst case, the launch of iPhone 17.
Apple Intelligence has been available for months now, and in fact in other threads people are complaining loudly about Apple daring to turn it on by default.Class action lawsuit should be considered for everyone that bought an iPhone 16 with the marketing being primarily “Hello, Apple Intelligence.” I would have never upgraded seeing we likely won’t get what was promised before WWDC 2025 or in worst case, the launch of iPhone 17.
Apple replaced my butterfly keyboards at least twice over the years at no charge. No misrepresentation [to me]: the keyboards failed and Apple replaced them.Apple is very competent on skating the line between what's legal and what's misrepresented. Butterfly keyboards come to mind.
Correct. But billions of users made Apple their home for their own reasons.Nobody does know that, you're right
It's also why folks that claim the "billions of users" indicate happiness with all of Apple's actions are incorrect as well
Mass generalizing is a bad idea -- totally agree with you
Brings back memories of Copland:Apple was considering delaying or limiting at least some of its promised Apple Intelligence enhancements for Siri until iOS 18.5, due to the presence of bugs and other software engineering issues.
Gil Amelio stated that Copland was the primary focus of the company, aiming for a late-year release. Internally, however, the development effort was beset with problems due to dysfunctional corporate personnel and project management. Development milestones and developer release dates were missed repeatedly.
Didn't they already ship a brand-new Siri powered by LLMs?
They announced this at wwdc that there will be 3rd party independent inspections of apple cloud compute servers / software to verify their claims to be 100% private without storing any user data.Does anyone know what the "Verifiable privacy promise" is?
It's not a link on this page unfortunately
View attachment 2483097