The security certificates are renewed. Apple put in the work to do this. They even provided the solution free of charge and really easy to do. It's called update to iOS 7. Because you want a different free solution doesn't mean they did not provide one.
Anyone who disagrees with you is an apologist? I would like to know if your argument passes logic and reasonableness tests. If it doesn't, then calling you out on it is not apologizing for Apple. I empathize with you. From reading your posts, you feel you are in the right, so your arguments should carry the day regardless if they are good arguments. Unfortunately that is not enough.
Make an argument why Apple is morally, ethically, commercially, logically, or reasonably obligated to go to lengths to provide you with a different free solution because you don't like theirs. Make it a good argument. You feel you are right, I can tell. Put this into an argument that holds water.
You say "no matter what" like you know that those disagreeing with you are completely without merit and yet speaking out against you.
So, if you would indulge me, answer some questions. In your opinion is it even possible for Apple to be right in this situation? Is it possible to be right in any situation where consumers disagree with them? How do you draw the line then for when Apple should be defended because they are right? What evidence would it take for you to believe that Apple is in the right? What arguments about reasonableness in situations could persuade you that Apple is in the right?
If you answer that Apple cannot be right, and that no evidence or arguments could exist that could persuade you, then I'm afraid it is you who is being dogmatic and arguing "no matter what."