Even funnier is that you can't tell the difference between "truth" and something you made up.![]()
oh trust me on this
Even funnier is that you can't tell the difference between "truth" and something you made up.![]()
As an owner of a 4:3 iPad 4 and a 16:9 Surface 2, I can say that one AR is more suitable for touch/tablet operation and one is more suitable for netbook operation.
16:9 (or 16:10) AR is too narrow in portrait mode to make typing feasible. The added height in portrait adds to the mechanical leverage of the device in the hand causing fatigue more quickly.
16:9 (or 16:10) in landscape is too wide causing the onscreen keyboard to take up 3/4 of the screen.
When I want to operate in "tablet mode" I use my iPad. But because of the 4:3 AR, keyboards the same size as the iPad are a little on the small size. But with the 16:9 of the Surface 2, the keyboard cover's keyboard is exactly the same size as the keyboard on my 15.4" Macbook Pro.
It's one or the other. There isn't an aspect ratio that is optimal for both.
That is old information. It was true under Windows 8, but with 8.1 Microsoft introduced the ability to have a range of split screens sizes. It is quite handy with 8.1... aided by the 16:9 aspect ratio of the screen. I don't think it will be as beneficial on the iPad.When you're in Tablet mode, you can bring up a thin side-bar for viewing other content, like a movie. It's pretty small, so there's a big limitation in productivity.
Someone will soon talk about a lack of RAM...... :?
Old news
Have this already
Lets hope Apple is taking notes with these concepts.
hahahaha this is just funny
98% macrumors users Before this rumor came out:
iPad doesnt need multi-tasking like Samsung and windows tablets have!!
100% macrumors users after this rumor came out:
Yes! ipad needed this so badly! i cant wait for this!
/truth
Probably i am the only one in the world who doesn't care. I just want to use 1 app at time on my iPad, i have my Mac for these kind of things.
There are probably some of those people but most of us like Apple products for what they get right and live with what they don't... and are happy when it seems like Apple may make a good improvement.
When the Apple fans can no longer pooh-pooh the competition, and their advances, they always revert to the "ah, but Apple will do it better."
Right on cue!
I don't know about this whole idea of "general consensus". It's not really something one finds on the internet
Basically, I think Apple releases features when the complete picture is ready, and competitors release them when it's initially technically feasible, so sounds good on a spec sheet. To each their own. I know what sounds more useful to me.
Followed by this a few months later (not necessarily the same poster):Samesung phablets sukz dude, Apple will never copy that trash, lulz!
Yea, Apple's going to show Shamesung how to do phablets korrekt manz, PWNED, lulz!
If it'll be indeed (artificially) restricted to newer models (to force people to upgrade, as is so frequently done by Apple), I have some good news: the recently-released JB windowing environment "OS Experience" runs just great on "old" hardware too. I've used it a lot on my iPad3 and found it excellent.
See https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1724497/ for more info.
that aint happening since most of iDevices are for personal use.
My Galaxy S5 has that feature. I've never used it. I played with it once and then disabled it.
I didn't know Apple was going to start copying Samsung Tablets...
Only because you think it is a "must have" feature. Everybody has a pet feature that they think will cause people to line up around the block to buy.
I'll offer you a response that many others receive: "Looks like what you need is a laptop."
That is the standard response to the following:
- I need a physical keyboard for my iPad
- I need a mouse for my iPad
- I need splitscreen on my iPad
- I need support for SD cards on my iPad
- I need enough RAM to have 8 Safari tabs open without reloading
Why does multi-user profile deserve a different answer?![]()
Or they could just use Touch ID to determine which user to switch to...The multi-tasking thing would be great, but the user account feature could be very simply implemented:
You know how you type in a 4-digit passcode now? Depending on which of multiple passcodes you enter, you log in to that account. 1122 could be the password getting you in to user A's account, while 3344 could be the password letting you in to user B's account.
I can hear Microsoft Surface customers laughing all the way to heaven
This is not fair.... And when Apple "does" add feature for split screen, its implemented very poorly ?
Why must you go via the task switcher and then add want you want to split ?
Too much effort.. how about an easy flick in an app to have split screen ?
I could say really great things Apple does for iOS, but this implementation is not one of them.
You realise that Macs could do this far longer than Samsung Tablets have been around, right?
It really does. I think we will see this when iPads get touch Id, then the user account is locked to the fingerprint allowing for seamless access.
You do like those goal posts dont you Todd!
Were talking tablets here, not PC's or Macs.
Tablets and desktops have different purposes. It sounds like what you want is a laptop.
Because you can't copy features from PCs to tablets?![]()
They are different technology. PCs can do a lot more then phones/tablets.