I've seen multiple people suggest that plasmas have some non-zero amount of light output. Can someone provide a source for that? (Still, marketing people are going to call it infinite regardless I understand).
It damn well better have a retina display. Right now, I have $700 held back for an iPad. The only reason I haven't gone out and bought an iPad 2 is because of all the rumors surrounding the iPad 3. If it doesn't have retina, I'll be soooo maaaaad.
"What we meant by 'amazing screen' is that the colors are, like, really good. I mean look at these colors!. They're really good"!
....soooo maaaaad![]()
Hope it's "truly amazingly" lighter and thinner because the display on there now doesn't exactly suck. --R
The iPhone 4S Retina screen is sharp, but one thing I've been disappointed with is the black levels, and this includes the current iPad screens. The black level is very high (i.e. what should be "black" is actually "gray"). This reduces color saturation and contrast and is very noticeable in darkened lighting situations (for example, try reading an iBook in the dark with the "night" theme and turning the screen brightness down). Some of this is backlight leakage around the screen edges and some may just be the nature of the LED technology they're using. Would really love to see closer to true blacks on these screens.
And, it would also be great if you could somehow color calibrate these screens, they tend to ship too blue out of the factory, as most screens do. As iPads are being used for more complex applications, the need for better color criticality is increasing. iPads are increasingly being used for content creation and display. For example, showing clients your photographs or artwork. Obviously you want your work to look as good as possible, something Apple should understand. A lot of people won't need to or want to calibrate their iPad screen, but it would be great for Apple to open a way to do it you you are someone who wants or needs that functionality. Even downloading a separate color calibration app would be fine with me, and Apple doesn't even need to create it, they just need to provide the API for it and storing those settings.
If you can turn a pixel completely off, it's light level is 0. Any number divided by 0 is infinity, so the white number is actually meaningless when you have a true "off" option for your pixels. Now, if you want to talk about light bleed or relative intensity, that's different. In a way, it shows how the idea of a contrast ratio is broken for newer displays.
edit: I've seen multiple people suggest that plasmas have some non-zero amount of light output. Can someone provide a source for that? (Still, marketing people are going to call it infinite regardless I understand).
That's odd: my math instructors always said that division by zero is undefined.
edit: I've seen multiple people suggest that plasmas have some non-zero amount of light output. Can someone provide a source for that? (Still, marketing people are going to call it infinite regardless I understand).
D.T. said:"who did not want to be identified because Apple is not fond of leaks."
haha smart guy
Tim Cook: "Jony, check it out, I made a couple of anonymous calls and it's already on Mac Rumors"!
komodrone said:probably a 3d screen like 3ds
yuck.
Truly amazing!
I don't need to provide a source, all I have to do is look at my plasma TV.
While it's certainly better than an LCD, it still emits light when it should be truly black.
Now, back to the discussion about the iPad 3, which will not have a plasma display...
What more can we possibly learn about this from now to the beginning March??
...my iPad 1 screen is perfectly fine for everything that it does.
If apple wants to be revolutionary they don't need a retina display they would incorporate a 4th led into the screen and that would be yellow.
So you would have red, blue, green and yellow.
Would make the display look great.