It would seem like your hand would cover it up when holding the device in landscape...
.....then it would turn itself off like the screen on an iPhone when you bring it to your face.
It would seem like your hand would cover it up when holding the device in landscape...
Maybe it will ship with a camera or maybe they decided to not ship with a camera to satisfy business and government need for security. I understand that Apple supports disabling of the camera in the iPhone for military clients.
Maybe it will ship with a camera or maybe they decided to not ship with a camera to satisfy business and government need for security. I understand that Apple supports disabling of the camera in the iPhone for military clients.
I'm pretty sure you are correct about OS 4.0, not too sure about the camera. Possible but I wouldn't say any better than 50:50 chance.No... At the iPhone OS 4.0 event in March (before the iPad is released), they will show off iPhone OS 4 with multitasking and show it off with the iPad using videoconferencing.
Then the iPad will be released shortly after in late March, with a built-in camera of limited utility. The iPad gains videoconferencing abilities in June when iPhone OS 4 is final and ships. You will be able to call and share your screen with the 2010 iPhone too.
They can't show off videoconferencing or the camera now because videoconferencing requires multitasking (it's not much use otherwise). The multitasking interface isn't a feature of OS 3.x
There will only be one revision of iPad in 2010.
Why? None of the software they are building on 3.2 will fail to run on 4.0 and there will be several months between the iOS 4.0 announcement and its release, so they'll have time to test and update any apps. Pretty common timeline for the iPhone world.No offense but from a developers standpoint that's seriously flawed.
It requires a case change to incorporate the antenna, and includes a GPS which is not present in the WiFi-only model. So that plus the radio/modem chip for cellular, $130 seems about right.
Also, price it just a couple bucks more and no one buys the WiFi-only version!
Excuse me, but some of us have careers in which our clients expect us to have this technology, so yes, I will be in line and my bank account will thank me.
gizmodo and engadget had hands on with the iPad neither reported anything about a camera. I think they would have seen the camera.
That would be a neat trick, since "IOS" is the registered trademark for Cisco's router operating system.
I think it is clear that Apple originally intended to have a camera in the iPad. However Apple are also a company that would not want to implement a feature that worked poorly. I am not a video compression expert, but I know that to compress video well so that you can stream over WiFi or 3G the software compares each frame and looks at the information that moves from frame to Frame. If you have a stable camera on say a desktop mac or notebook then the compression software only has to worry about what is moving ( the face), on a handheld device like the iPad the whole frame is probably moving, and I suspect the video quality was poor. I belive that is why it was pulled. Yes I know that many phones have video camera capability, but these issues will not appear to be so bad as the screen resolution is a lot less.
Yes you can dock the IPad, but that defeats the purpose of it in the first point. Apple don't want people to say 'the web cam quality sucks'
This is just my theory on why you will not see an iSight in the iPad.
That said, while I hope that there is a camera lying in the bottom portion of the iceberg, I have a hard time beliving that there is.
Video conferencing on a phone, however, is much more iportant than video confencing on a tablet.
If this is true..
EVERYONE BUY AN iPAD AND MAKE IS A SUCCESS. That way version 2 will come out and be better for me to buy![]()