Thank youThe 29W charger required for fast charging is the power supply which comes with the 12" Macbook.
Thank youThe 29W charger required for fast charging is the power supply which comes with the 12" Macbook.
This is excellent news.
I'm hoping this will trickle down to the rest of the iPad and iPhone lineup. Charging at 29W will completely blow away any current fast charging techs. Even Qualcomm's QC 3.0 standard is limited to 18W.
What would be amazing is if portable batteries started operating at these speeds. Imagine being able to charge a 20,000 mAh portable external battery to full in 1-2 hours, then doing the same with an iPad Pro, or in just a few minutes for an iPhone.
[doublepost=1458753791][/doublepost]Doing some quick research, it looks like the closest competitor is the Motorola turbo power 25 at 25W. One advantage - if you're loyal enough to the Apple / iOS ecosystem, you would potentially get broad 29W charging capability across all your gadgets.
It would be nice, but I'm concerned that if Apple makes a push into wireless charging (which is very slow), they won't focus on wired charging speed. Which is much more important for most people. Imagine being able to charge up your phone completely in 5-10 mins!
I've done mild video creation workloads where the battery was actually running DOWN while plugged in. So for people trying to use the iPad Pro as a Pro device then having a charger that "just works" is fantastic. (But paying $75 for something that should've been included is just damn evil)It's amazing to learn that so many people have a shorter sleeping and therefore charging time at night than 4.5 hours. Maybe I am sleeping too long.....
It's amazing to learn that so many people have a shorter sleeping and therefore charging time at night than 4.5 hours. Maybe I am sleeping too long.....
I just got my Cable and the 29W charger, and woah! It charges crazily fast. Especially compared to the included 12W charger. The iPad gains 1% every 1.5 minutes or so, even though it is turned on. My guess is: 80% in 1.5 hours or so, the last 20% maybe another 1.5 hours, maybe a little bit faster.
This is definitely the charger apple should have included with the 12.9" iPad. Maybe one day, when USB-C is more common, all iPads will come with the big charger.
I've probably owned every iPad since the first one (skipped the 4 of course and any Mini after the first).
The iPad Pro is the first one where I put it on the charger when I went to bed and it wasn't fully charged the next morning.
I couldn't believe it.
Yup that is the charger .. Now just need the usbc to lightning cableI've probably owned every iPad since the first one (skipped the 4 of course and any Mini after the first).
The iPad Pro is the first one where I put it on the charger when I went to bed and it wasn't fully charged the next morning.
I couldn't believe it.
[doublepost=1458758547][/doublepost]
Can you link to both parts to verify exactly what is needed?
I assume this is the charger:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...r_us_title&tag=amz-mkt-chr-us-20&tagbase=abba
Is this possible using a 3rd party USB-C to lightning cable?
I've done mild video creation workloads where the battery was actually running DOWN while plugged in. So for people trying to use the iPad Pro as a Pro device then having a charger that "just works" is fantastic. (But paying $75 for something that should've been included is just damn evil)
I do remember seeing people tHat had tested using the 29w charer with a 3rd party usb-c to lightning cable and it did not increase charging speeds at all. It would appear that the chipset in the lightning end of this new cable is what's regulating the increased powerflow. So if i am correct, then i would be sorta the opposite of what you may be thinking in that you need the OEM cable, but you can use any usb-c charger that can supply the power for faster charging.
I'd be willing or overpay for Apples $25 USBC cable. But it's really tough to justify $50 USBC brick. Using 3rd party should be safe, right?I'd be careful about that. Third-party USB C cables (even legitimate ones from Amazon) have been known to fry the attached device. The only legitimate USB-C to Lightning cable is the one Apple just released.
I'd be willing or overpay for Apples $25 USBC cable. But it's really tough to justify $50 USBC brick. Using 3rd party should be safe, right?
(Seriously though. If this is the way the Pro should be charged then why not bundle it?)
All the third party cables as of yet do not support USB 3 and thus not fast charging.
Also, the USB-C power supply can deliver either 2A @14.5V or 2.4A @5.2V. By default it will only supply 2.4A @5.2V, unless both the device and cable (!) confirm that they support a higher voltage. Because the iPhone will not do this, it will charge just as fast as it does with a 12W iPad power supply.
What about cables like this one? It says USB 3.1.![]()
Also, the USB-C power supply can deliver either 2A @14.5V or 2.4A @5.2V. By default it will only supply 2.4A @5.2V, unless both the device and cable (!) confirm that they support a higher voltage. Because the iPhone will not do this, it will charge just as fast as it does with a 12W iPad power supply.
If what Daku93 said is true, the phone needs to confirm it can handle the higher voltage. It wouldn't, so I imagine it would be fine.My concern is whether or not it would damage the iPhone. Are you sure it will charge the iPhone without damaging it?
I would be willing to spend the money on the new charger and cable, but I don't want to have to carry around 2 chargers and 2 cables when I travel, so if I get this new USB-C power supply and the USB-C to Lighning cable, then I would want to use that to charge both the iPhone and the iPad Pro.