Unfortunately you are probably correct and that will prolong them from making a true iPad pro that could replace a laptop.Although, several million people will disagree with you.
Unfortunately you are probably correct and that will prolong them from making a true iPad pro that could replace a laptop.Although, several million people will disagree with you.
Well, consider this. The Surface line outsells every other 2-in-i on the market, and the 2-in-1 market, on average, has almost doubled sales this year, and again Surface is well above the average of its OEM partners like Dell, Lenovo and HP. It was confirmed that there were at least a few million Pro 3's sold last year. So doubling that, at least 6 million Surface Pro's will sell this year and if we are being more realistic since it sells much more than its OEM partners' products do, perhaps 10 million.Source for the statement that it doesn't sell well please?
My understanding surface Pro 3 is a runway hit, they shrunk it in Surface 3, and released a successor (Surface 4), and a spin off (Surface Book)
Not necessarily. As much as I hate atom processor, there are people who prefer the form factor of MacBook and does not demand processing power of a properly specced laptop.So with iPad pro...it basically kills of mac book.
Define refined. The Surface Pro 4's display, for example, is the most accurate tablet display on the planet.Only 2 problems with the surface pro:
- the hardware is not as refined
- it isn't as good as an iPad in tablet mode and it is not a good laptop
Tim, you'd sell a lot more of these iPad Pros if users were able to run OS X on it and pair a mouse with it.
Seems to me the buying public and Enterprises disagree with you. Build quality has been fantastic on mine and tablet mode works exceedingly well. True not as many apps, but many many iOS and android apps are little more than a web wrapper. There of course are many exceptions and some very good apps missing on the Windows platform. However, there is nothing I have run across than another Windows variant doesn't fill the void - and many times - better.Only 2 problems with the surface pro:
- the hardware is not as refined
- it isn't as good as an iPad in tablet mode and it is not a good laptop
This iPad Pro got enough hardware power to replace a laptop for creatives already... Only if Apple would open up file system access and support mouse interface for developers to "port" OS X app to run on iOS for similar experience and usability.Unfortunately you are probably correct and that will prolong them from making a true iPad pro that could replace a laptop.
If you are getting a cumulative update, then you are not on the latest build.Looks like I'm up to date, just getting a cumulative update right now on my SP3. My main issues come from flash, site rendering, and RAM use. I can easily have a single tab take up 400mb or RAM for WC. I also have issues typing stuff on some forums because the cursor disappears at times depending on the forum. YouTube is the bane of my battery. These are issues that is likely not their fault.
I get less than 4 hours of battery life when doing my normal browsing on Edge. Then again, my normal browsing generally involves videos. iPad has apps which take less power for whatever reason than flash.
you forgot /sNo, no, no, didn't you hear? It's supposed to be a PC replacement. It's supposed to be Microsoft Surface. It's supposed to be running iOSX. It's supposed to make you a grilled cheese sandwich. Apple PROMISED all these things.
Broad well and Skylake i5 are from 2015 ....Intel's Core-M processors are not about speed. They are about a tradeoff between sipping power and running a real x86 operating system.
It does not surprise me that the i5 is not impressive compared to an A9x. An i5 is how old?
Compared to a dual core or quad core i7, oh there really isn't one.
Also raw performance is just one aspect. You also need balanced I/O.
So to think the A9x is a desktop class processor with no real disk I/O or PCIe is just silly.
except it's not true ...And the best part about it is the Surface Pro 4 at $999 outperforms both the entry level MacBook Pro and the iPad Pro while doing everything both can do... and more. I only need one device that is cheaper than either individually!![]()
yes, because smart guys are all here, right ?Apple stores are filled with dumb people.
better than what ? give me a break ... BTW I think you could enjoy windows central website: a god place to speak about how "terrific" Microsoft products are.Search the context for the photo. It, of course, had no stylus. It is what Jobs said that Apple now went back on that is gloriously hilarious.
With this, I agree. If you like iOS for its UX, simplicity, and so on, get it. Same for any device. But for most people, if you are considering performance, screen quality, stability, support, compatibility (Android can run on Windows) and so on, the Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book are better in their respective categories than competing products.
No that is incorrect. Surface Pro has been growing. Specifically, up 44% this past quarter. And this is why Apple released the SurPad Pro.![]()
I get less than 4 hours of battery life when doing my normal browsing on Edge. Then again, my normal browsing generally involves videos. iPad has apps which take less power for whatever reason than flash.
Seems to me the buying public and Enterprises disagree with you. Build quality has been fantastic on mine and tablet mode works exceedingly well. True not as many apps, but many many iOS and android apps are little more than a web wrapper. There of course are many exceptions and some very good apps missing on the Windows platform. However, there is nothing I have run across than another Windows variant doesn't fill the void - and many times - better.
People with limited needs and limited budget, or just want 2-in-1 just because are the market for surface because it is one and only, until Apple decides to compete.
Define refined. The Surface Pro 4's display, for example, is the most accurate tablet display on the planet.
http://www.displaymate.com/Surface_Pro4_ShootOut_1.htm
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9727/the-microsoft-surface-pro-4-review-raising-the-bar/6
It's almost like apple doesn't understand users' needs.
I disagree. I would not want to run a full OS on a tablet. It won't work. That's why the iPad sells so well. And hey - guess what? The typing experience on the new iPad Pro is amazing, even without a keyboard attachment. Because the keys are so much bigger, it actually feels amazing to type on.
I do not want a full OS on my tablet device. If it's going to be a full OS, it needs to specifically customized for a touch screen. Windows 10 isn't there yet, sadly.
I love my iPad Pro, and it positively destroys the iPad Air 2. Can't see myself going back.
I'd say with the Pro, Apple is just about in the 2-in-1 market. The SPs and Pro are far more similar than they are dissimilar in form and function.
Apple already sells more iPads and MacBook Air/Retina's combined than Microsoft sells Surface devices. So why switch to the losing (and thus less profitable) strategy? Two separate product lines works better, and thus sells better. The customers money (in aggregate) has already spoken.
Reality check: this is not 2007 anymore AND the Apple Pencil won't be used on an iPhone .
So with iPad pro...it basically kills of mac book.
Exactly. Those who keep whining about an Apple hybrid fail to understand business. When the market demands it through sales, only then will Apple cannibalize their MacBook sales in favor of a hybrid device.Apple already sells more iPads and MacBook Air/Retina's combined than Microsoft sells Surface devices. So why switch to the losing (and thus less profitable) strategy? Two separate product lines works better, and thus sells better. The customers money (in aggregate) has already spoken.
You think apple people know what they are talking about?you forgot /s
Broad well and Skylake i5 are from 2015 ....
except it's not true ...
yes, because smart guys are all here, right ?
better than what ? give me a break ... BTW I think you could enjoy windows central website: a god place to speak about how "terrific" Microsoft products are.
wrong.
Microsoft's revenue was down during the first quarter of its 2016 fiscal year, the company reported today in an earnings release. Revenue came in at $20.4 billion, down 12 percent year over year, while income came in at $5.8 billion, down just 1 percent from the same time last year. Net income was at $4.6 billion, a 2 percent increase. Declines came from a number of categories, but one of the notable dips was in Surface hardware. While Surface revenue had been climbing quickly over the past year, it's now fallen to $672 million, down from $908 million in the same quarter of 2015.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/22/9599674/microsoft-q1-2016-earnings
yeah...i hate those type of people.Not necessarily. As much as I hate atom processor, there are people who prefer the form factor of MacBook and does not demand processing power of a properly specced laptop.
It's getting there, but not quite. The problem is in the software itself.
Additionally, it is Apple that is piggy backing off the Surface Pro 3 design.