Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Source for the statement that it doesn't sell well please?

My understanding surface Pro 3 is a runway hit, they shrunk it in Surface 3, and released a successor (Surface 4), and a spin off (Surface Book)
Well, consider this. The Surface line outsells every other 2-in-i on the market, and the 2-in-1 market, on average, has almost doubled sales this year, and again Surface is well above the average of its OEM partners like Dell, Lenovo and HP. It was confirmed that there were at least a few million Pro 3's sold last year. So doubling that, at least 6 million Surface Pro's will sell this year and if we are being more realistic since it sells much more than its OEM partners' products do, perhaps 10 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jase1125
Tim, you'd sell a lot more of these iPad Pros if users were able to run OS X on it and pair a mouse with it.

Apple already sells more iPads and MacBook Air/Retina's combined than Microsoft sells Surface devices. So why switch to the losing (and thus less profitable) strategy? Two separate product lines works better, and thus sells better. The customers money (in aggregate) has already spoken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CEmajr
Only 2 problems with the surface pro:
- the hardware is not as refined
- it isn't as good as an iPad in tablet mode and it is not a good laptop
Seems to me the buying public and Enterprises disagree with you. Build quality has been fantastic on mine and tablet mode works exceedingly well. True not as many apps, but many many iOS and android apps are little more than a web wrapper. There of course are many exceptions and some very good apps missing on the Windows platform. However, there is nothing I have run across than another Windows variant doesn't fill the void - and many times - better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSheepHunter
Unfortunately you are probably correct and that will prolong them from making a true iPad pro that could replace a laptop.
This iPad Pro got enough hardware power to replace a laptop for creatives already... Only if Apple would open up file system access and support mouse interface for developers to "port" OS X app to run on iOS for similar experience and usability.
 
Looks like I'm up to date, just getting a cumulative update right now on my SP3. My main issues come from flash, site rendering, and RAM use. I can easily have a single tab take up 400mb or RAM for WC. I also have issues typing stuff on some forums because the cursor disappears at times depending on the forum. YouTube is the bane of my battery. These are issues that is likely not their fault.



I get less than 4 hours of battery life when doing my normal browsing on Edge. Then again, my normal browsing generally involves videos. iPad has apps which take less power for whatever reason than flash.
If you are getting a cumulative update, then you are not on the latest build.
 
No, no, no, didn't you hear? It's supposed to be a PC replacement. It's supposed to be Microsoft Surface. It's supposed to be running iOSX. It's supposed to make you a grilled cheese sandwich. Apple PROMISED all these things.
you forgot /s
Intel's Core-M processors are not about speed. They are about a tradeoff between sipping power and running a real x86 operating system.

It does not surprise me that the i5 is not impressive compared to an A9x. An i5 is how old?
Compared to a dual core or quad core i7, oh there really isn't one.

Also raw performance is just one aspect. You also need balanced I/O.
So to think the A9x is a desktop class processor with no real disk I/O or PCIe is just silly.
Broad well and Skylake i5 are from 2015 ....

And the best part about it is the Surface Pro 4 at $999 outperforms both the entry level MacBook Pro and the iPad Pro while doing everything both can do... and more. I only need one device that is cheaper than either individually! :D
except it's not true ...
Apple stores are filled with dumb people.
yes, because smart guys are all here, right ?

Search the context for the photo. It, of course, had no stylus. It is what Jobs said that Apple now went back on that is gloriously hilarious.

With this, I agree. If you like iOS for its UX, simplicity, and so on, get it. Same for any device. But for most people, if you are considering performance, screen quality, stability, support, compatibility (Android can run on Windows) and so on, the Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book are better in their respective categories than competing products.
better than what ? give me a break ... BTW I think you could enjoy windows central website: a god place to speak about how "terrific" Microsoft products are.

No that is incorrect. Surface Pro has been growing. Specifically, up 44% this past quarter. And this is why Apple released the SurPad Pro. ;)

wrong.
Microsoft's revenue was down during the first quarter of its 2016 fiscal year, the company reported today in an earnings release. Revenue came in at $20.4 billion, down 12 percent year over year, while income came in at $5.8 billion, down just 1 percent from the same time last year. Net income was at $4.6 billion, a 2 percent increase. Declines came from a number of categories, but one of the notable dips was in Surface hardware. While Surface revenue had been climbing quickly over the past year, it's now fallen to $672 million, down from $908 million in the same quarter of 2015.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/22/9599674/microsoft-q1-2016-earnings
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
I get less than 4 hours of battery life when doing my normal browsing on Edge. Then again, my normal browsing generally involves videos. iPad has apps which take less power for whatever reason than flash.

I'd say I get around 6ish, maybe 7 on the high end out of the SP4. I think the biggest problem with the SP3, and probably the reason why it eats so much battery power, is that it uses the SP2 internals in a body designed for the more efficient Skylake processors. Kicking that fan on every 15 seconds does have a bad habit of sucking down the juice.

As for the reason why apps use less power than Flash, it's because mobile apps are designed to be as efficient as possible. Flash isn't.
 
Seems to me the buying public and Enterprises disagree with you. Build quality has been fantastic on mine and tablet mode works exceedingly well. True not as many apps, but many many iOS and android apps are little more than a web wrapper. There of course are many exceptions and some very good apps missing on the Windows platform. However, there is nothing I have run across than another Windows variant doesn't fill the void - and many times - better.

I didn't say the build quality is not "fantastic". I said it's not as refined as iPad.

People with limited needs and limited budget, or just want 2-in-1 just because are the market for surface because it is one and only, until Apple decides to compete.
 
It's almost like apple doesn't understand users' needs.

Apple understands users quite well. That's why Apple sells far more iOS devices to real users than MacBooks (or any other vendor's laptop model for that matter.) Users have voted for their needs with their money: in total revenue, iOS wins.

But Apple also sells lots of MacBooks for people with needs perhaps closer to yours.
 
I disagree. I would not want to run a full OS on a tablet. It won't work. That's why the iPad sells so well. And hey - guess what? The typing experience on the new iPad Pro is amazing, even without a keyboard attachment. Because the keys are so much bigger, it actually feels amazing to type on.

I do not want a full OS on my tablet device. If it's going to be a full OS, it needs to specifically customized for a touch screen. Windows 10 isn't there yet, sadly.

I love my iPad Pro, and it positively destroys the iPad Air 2. Can't see myself going back.

This, I don't understand how people think using a desktop OS on a tablet is going to be easy to use. it is such a hassle clicking on the menus with a finger.

And I DONT WANT a desktop OS with giant buttons either.
 
Apple already sells more iPads and MacBook Air/Retina's combined than Microsoft sells Surface devices. So why switch to the losing (and thus less profitable) strategy? Two separate product lines works better, and thus sells better. The customers money (in aggregate) has already spoken.

Well if you are going there you need to include laptops from other OEMs as well. Microsoft is in the hardware market to push OEMs to build better devices and propagate Windows. Microsoft isn't in it to own the hardware market like Apple. Apples / Oranges on the respective strategies of each. Furthermore, the hybrid device is growing and tablet only is falling quarter over quarter. Additionally, it is Apple that is piggy backing off the Surface Pro 3 design.
 
Reality check: this is not 2007 anymore AND the Apple Pencil won't be used on an iPhone .

You obviously don't understand the context... at all. Watch the full video. Jobs condemns styli of any kind as awkward and unwieldy, and believes touch and a desktop OS never should be mixed together. This meme is not implying that the iPhone will ever have a stylus. The point is this: Jobs was adamantly against a stylus on iOS products because he knew it would pull their focus from the consumer market, where they have the most success. Now, Cook has done exactly what Jobs told them not to do--put a stylus on an iOS device and market it to professionals and corporations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Am I the only person who thinks that the Apple Pencil would be less of a ripoff if it was included with every iPad Pro purchase? Basically, it would would be the same mentality as including a bluetooth keyboard and Magic Mouse with every iMac and if the Apple Pencil is so vital to the iPad Pro experience, why not just included instead of making customers fork over another $100 for something that's already overpriced at $800? Is Cook that greedy? Then again iPads still don't come with earbuds, do they?
 
Apple already sells more iPads and MacBook Air/Retina's combined than Microsoft sells Surface devices. So why switch to the losing (and thus less profitable) strategy? Two separate product lines works better, and thus sells better. The customers money (in aggregate) has already spoken.
Exactly. Those who keep whining about an Apple hybrid fail to understand business. When the market demands it through sales, only then will Apple cannibalize their MacBook sales in favor of a hybrid device.

As of now these Surface devices just aren't selling enough or generating enough profit (if any) for Apple to release a direct competitor device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: firewood
you forgot /s

Broad well and Skylake i5 are from 2015 ....

except it's not true ...

yes, because smart guys are all here, right ?


better than what ? give me a break ... BTW I think you could enjoy windows central website: a god place to speak about how "terrific" Microsoft products are.

wrong.
Microsoft's revenue was down during the first quarter of its 2016 fiscal year, the company reported today in an earnings release. Revenue came in at $20.4 billion, down 12 percent year over year, while income came in at $5.8 billion, down just 1 percent from the same time last year. Net income was at $4.6 billion, a 2 percent increase. Declines came from a number of categories, but one of the notable dips was in Surface hardware. While Surface revenue had been climbing quickly over the past year, it's now fallen to $672 million, down from $908 million in the same quarter of 2015.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/22/9599674/microsoft-q1-2016-earnings
You think apple people know what they are talking about?

Not necessarily. As much as I hate atom processor, there are people who prefer the form factor of MacBook and does not demand processing power of a properly specced laptop.
yeah...i hate those type of people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hahaha, a powerful device gimped by a mobile OS the same as the iPhone runs.... [FACEPALM]

Oh Apple Apple Apple, how this could have been with a special touch version of OSX.

And as for the Surface Book being diluted, erm, yeah, a device that makes the iPad Pro look like a toy.

Loving this war of words, it's like Sony VS Microsoft during the PS3 VS 360 day's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pat500000
It's getting there, but not quite. The problem is in the software itself.

On both ends. The SP4 doesn't have nearly the same amount of touch-centric apps the Pro does, but the Pro doesn't have the apps that can take advantage of its awesome hardware yet.

I've always said we'd reach a point where a laptop and a tablet would be one and the same. We're getting close to it. Apple and MS both are coming to the same solution from opposite ends. But we're not there yet. Not entirely.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.