Fox News had such a great track record for the iPad event last week.![]()
Just continuing tradition I suppose
Fox News had such a great track record for the iPad event last week.![]()
kind of off-topic but is the iphone coming to verizon?
If this is true than the iphone will probably come for verizon too.
Do these "iPhone/iPod moving to Verizon" rumors ever end?
Why should Apple waste all sorts of time and money developing a CDMA iPhone/iPad when Verizon is replacing their CDMA network within a couple years?
not a low use item like the iPad.
Pros:
Verizon 3G network better than AT&T's.
Cons:
Still doesn't matter as I'm not paying $15-$60 per month for limited data needs outside of WiFi range.
AT&T should get smart and offer bundled iPhone/iPad data plan for $40-50 per month unlimited or a Pay as you go model with 250 MB for $x.xx and you refill it when it runs out. Otherwise, I'll take WiFi only, use my iPhone only when I can't get WiFi and invest that $130 model price difference in larger storage capacity.
Once ATT loses its exclusivity contract, people will want flexibility on carriers. Particularly, they will not want to have to pay a phone bill to one company and then a data bill to another.
When Steve said that the AT&T pricing was remarkable on the iPad data plan at $15 and $30 per month rather than $60, sorry, but that is for full fledge usb dongle internet service on a laptop, not a low use item like the iPad.
You want remarkable AT&T:
a. All iPhone customers paying a data plan get iPad 3G coverage included in what they already pay!
b. All iPhone customers can get WiFi only model and tether their iPhones.
Unless one of those situations was announced, then it's not remarkable.
Give me Pay as you go refill model with months to use it up or I'll take a WiFi only but no way I give AT&T another $15 or $30 a month.
I suspect your opinion on that is based on something you overheard in the lunchroom at the Nerd's Table (you know...over there in the corner).You need to understand version wont get anthing anytime soon. Att and apple love each other. Get over it version sucks
I figured there was going to be a CDMA radio in there on tear-down.
Guess we will see - but i don't see there being a CDMA version, and then a GSM version. It will do both if it does CDMA - the customer will get a choice thru iTunes who they want to use.
OR, like I really thought might happen - you pay APPLE the $15-30 and they take care of the network side. Load sharing at it's finest.....
I totally agree with you. I'm not paying another penny to AT&T for a data plan. iPhone users should get it at no additional charge especially since you are not using them both at the same time, at least I don't know why you would. Additionally, the $130.00 charge for the 3G hardware is nuts.
Right - if it has a Gobi chip it can do EV-DO (not CDMA voice). And, interesting, the Gobi chip does GPS with "assisted GPS". And, very interesting, the 3G Ipad does GPS with "assisted GPS". Coincidence?
The SIM card is irrelevant to the discussion. Instead of a portable SIM card, Verizon keys off the hardware ID of the radio (similar in a sense to the MAC address of an ethernet card).
It won't be "low use." At all.
We're going to see users addicted to their iPads. It's the internet virtually anywhere, on the most attractive device out there.
Do these "iPhone/iPod moving to Verizon" rumors ever end?
How do they know you aren't using it at the same time?
Why does it seem like AT&T customers expect tethering to be.... FREE??
It won't be. NOT. AT. ALL. This data offer from Apple/AT&T - is indeed an incredible deal here in the states. (and that is coming from a Verizon customer, and someone that would never use AT&T. But this is tempting all based on price)
Why should Apple waste all sorts of time and money developing a CDMA iPhone/iPad when Verizon is replacing their CDMA network within a couple years?
Ditto.
We need a law in the US denying exclusivity of one carrier over others with phones and whatnot. People should be allowed to choose.
That is correct, and in the case of Apple, their customer is the world market, not just the US, and the rest of the world uses GSM/HSDPA, not EVDO. Apple is all about efficiency in their mass production and higher margins. Sure, Verizon has a lot of customers, but that means another production branch, a different chipset, more FCC testing, more legal stuff to do a deal with Verizon, more tech support cost, etc, and all that just to satisfy a market in 1 country?Maybe they should listen to the old addage: "The customer is always right."
Verizon CDMA? So much for the idea of an "unlocked" iPad then. Not only it would be locked to a single provider, it's locked to 1 country too. Unless it will be using LTE, but that's a given for a future product, nothing surprising.
Why the hell would Apple want to stick it to AT&T?It's just my thoughts (NOT RUMORS)...
But Apple could really stick it to AT&T by rolling out an iPad for Verizon with webcam. With an ad something like "Their network can support the extra bandwidth that video needs!"
People that want to be on Verizon and want the iPad can simply buy the wifi only iPad and Verizon's MiFi. So Apple still gets the money without doing anything different.A market of around 80 MILLION Verizon subs either locked into that network, and/or not willing to switch to AT&T?