No they both run desktop operating systems, so they are in the same class.
An iMac runs a desktop operating system. A Mac Pro runs a desktop operating system. A rack-mounted server can run a desktop operating system............
No they both run desktop operating systems, so they are in the same class.
An iMac runs a desktop operating system. A Mac Pro runs a desktop operating system. A rack-mounted server can run a desktop operating system............
One's a laptop, one's a tablet. iPad Pro == Surface. Macbook /= Surface. Since they're both personal computers, can I compare an iMac to a Macbook Air? No.
Excluding the server. An iMac, a Mac Pro, a MacBook, and a MS Surface are all Personal Computers....
Either way MacBook is beating Surface in consumer polls.
And they are not all in the same class. Period. An iMac cannot be compared with a Macbook, just like a Macbook cannot be compared with a Surface.
Depends. If you're talking about the Surface RT, then yes, but the rest of the line does run a full desktop OS and runs all Windows desktop software. Comparing that to an iPad would be an unfair comparison for the iPad.
Depends. If you're talking about the Surface RT, then yes, but the rest of the line does run a full desktop OS and runs all Windows desktop software. Comparing that to an iPad would be an unfair comparison for the iPad.
bullpoop, just look what trumped the vacuum above. apple watch is 11th cause it's a useless product for anyone but apple tech enthusiasts.
Of course they can be compared. What are you some kind of nut? They're all personal computers. Sure they come in different packages, but the end goal is the same.
iPad Pro. Which Apple have specifically designed to compete with the Surface for a reason, because they have had nothing in this sector at all. It was Apple's own dumb decision to load it with iOS.
Apple Watch would be way higher, I think, if consumers really understood how tremendously it simplifies daily life - and of course had a compatible iPhone. I was pretty 'meh' about it, especially being a version 1.0 product, when it was announced. I cannot imagine not having one now. My wife, who has a hate-love relationship with all tech and never knows where her iPhone is, absolutely loves hers.
Most consumers don't have an iPhone. Apple enthusiasts tend to overlook that.Apple Watch would be way higher, I think, if consumers really understood how tremendously it simplifies daily life - and of course had a compatible iPhone. I was pretty 'meh' about it, especially being a version 1.0 product, when it was announced. I cannot imagine not having one now. My wife, who has a hate-love relationship with all tech and never knows where her iPhone is, absolutely loves hers.
I think you're just upset Apple products cost so much in Australia... The iPad is a different class then the Surface.. Sure they both have touch as an input, but so does my touch screen monitor for my PC... Is my PC the same as a Surface?
So where is the Gear S2, LG Urbane, Moto Almost 360, and Huawei Watch? I ask because the tech meme seems to be round is better. Yet none of those watches make this list.
Ummmmm......what does the price of Apple products in Australia have to do with anything (which at the current exchange rate actually come in at the same if not cheaper than US...)?
What was the main thing that the iPad Pro was aimed at? People wanting a professional workspace that was super portable and could be used on the go in any situation. What is the Surface aimed at? The exact same thing.
Just because Apple stuck iOS 9 on a device that screamed for a desktop OS, doesn't make it comparable to an iMac. By your logic, when someone is looking at buying a new computer just for home, they're going to sit down and think hmmmmm should I buy a Macbook which is specifically made to be portable and as energy efficient as possible to maximise battery or will I buy a desktop computer which is what I am actually looking for? No. They sit down and compare different iMacs. Possibly the Mac Pro. Possibly Windows desktops.
Exact same for Windows users. Do they have a toss up between getting a Surface to sit on a desk in an office at home and never move, or a desktop computer.
I think most people see smart watches as completely pointless. Why have a watch that tells me I have a text message when I can just look at my phone.
So why is Watch on the list then?I think most people see smart watches as completely pointless. Why have a watch that tells me I have a text message when I can just look at my phone.
I know plenty of people who own MacBooks just for home...
Mobile OS:
iPad
iPhone
Android
Windows Phone
etc.
Desktop OS:
Macs
Windows PCs (including Surface)
iPad is just a bigger iOS device, it doesn't put it in a different class just by stitching Pro to the end.. Same goes for Surface Pro...
There are Personal Computers, devices that run Desktop Operating systems. And Mobile Devices, devices that run Mobile Operating systems.
With my logic you can mac a comparison between a Macbook and a Surface. And people do all the time; look up Macbook vs Surface...
... so many people actually like Bose products?![]()
A vacuum beat the Apple Watch.
So by your logic, the iPad Pro is in the same class as an iPhone 4S (both run latest iOS), and Apple have created it to compete with the Microsoft Lumia smartphone? Eh....no. They created it to compete with the Surface/Surface Pro. Everyone but you knows that.
By your logic, someone who is considering a Range Rover (iMac 27"/Mac Pro) will also be considering a Peel P50 (Macbook/Macbook Air 11")? They're both cars? They both do the same thing?
A small hint for you: just because you have your logic, doesn't mean you share the logic with the majority. Not to say my logic does but you're so adamant that your logic is perfect on this one....................just saying.