Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Honestly Apple's improvements on everything at this point are really not that significant. I kinda wish they would lose the annual cycle and just make updates when they are truly significant, because it's getting ridiculous. Wishful thinking, I know.
You have to think that the heavily rumoured 'rent your idevice' from Apple scheme will launch early next year, to kick start 'sales' again.

(I said 'sales' as I'm assuming that you'd only ever rent your phone with this - for a lower monthly price point - and never get a chance to own it i.e. unlike the upgrade program).

They've obviously reached a point where the iPhone has plucked all of the low hanging fruit.

But they might tempt a lot of people with older iPhones to sign up to a relatively low rental price point for a newer model.
 
Wow Johny Srouji's team starting to splinter. Nothing related to Mac OS (gui choices, QA) suggests that the current Apple mgmt is very good at dealing with system complexity. If JS's team (which had been its own entity) is by necessity coming under the aegis of Apple's main mgmt team...
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Gudi and nt5672
I dont want ray tracking on my video cards and definitely not on my phone!!!!!
Not on the phone but this would be perfect for AppleTV and apparently, it would already be doable since power isn't an issue there. Heat? Put that fan back in, I don't care. It could finally become a decent game console competitor if Apple wasn't treating gaming like a hobby. :rolleyes:
 
I'm really shocked that Apple would get rid of so many people who were involved. Mistakes happen, and this report makes Apple sound like a toxic workplace.
You’re making a lot of assumptions. It could just as easily be that this was the *cure* for the toxic workplace that they had.

There has been a lot of stories about people poaching the chip team OGs. So the fill-ins have been responsible for the most recent rounds of chip designs.
 
This is interesting. I think we’re going to come to a point where our phones have fans but our laptops don’t.
 
This sounds like the development cycle for everything I’ve ever worked on… “Hey here’s a great idea, it’s going to be amazing, the team worked really hard to complete the design, it’s ready for production, oh shoot we just got some numbers in and it’s going to be too expensive/inefficient/risky, scrap that, just go back to something simple and we’ll figure that part out next time.”
The bean counter Tim didn’t want to invest the resources and capitol to substantially iterate over the 13? The annual slow trickle of “improvement” sounds about right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
‘Just work’ like the crash detection triggered in rollercoasters or maybe like the new HomeKit architecture that removed access to partner and flat mates so now they can’t control lights and speakers?
Well, there are things that they rushed to us though. And sure those ended up ugly to almost all of us. Lucky they haven't gone the "rushing to the public" route for this ray-tracing extra feature. Because if they did, boy it would be a perfect storm + utterly epic disaster combo. Think of it like Antennagate + Bendgate + Batterygate, all combined in one device.
 
Because I only feel like explaining this once.


[…]

More advanced designs do not necessarily draw more power. The issue here is that Apple may need to wait for proper TSMC 3nm for the transistor bump to balance out with the power consumption. Despite the wording of the article this was definitely not a last minute thing - these chips take months to tape out before they're even test fabbed.



Please tell me what you need more power in your Watch for. That you won't be able to answer the question is why there isn't a new core design there.
You answered your own question. A new chip would give the watch more battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Someyoungguy
You answered your own question. A new chip would give the watch more battery life.

As I told the last person who thought this was a gotcha, no, it's not.

The Watch does not do static compute loads the way the iPhone does. There is only so much you can do with a tiny battery to begin with. They could achieve a better power draw drop with a simple process node shrink on the existing chip.


The people complaining about not getting a new Watch SoC are complaining because it's not NEW SHINY and not because they wanted a battery life increase.
 
Folks, don’t fall for the Apple PR spin machine. Apple PR loves to “leak” sensational statements about a “just missed,” or “changed at the last minute,” feature, to build hype about how “bleeding edge” Apple is. In reality, the chip decision was made well before the iPhone 14 was in production.
 
With the power of iPhones increasing and the adoption of a Thunderbolt 4 port it should be possible to plug an iPhone into the Studio monitor and use it as a Mac. The ultimate portable Mac, but I'm not holding my breath as I'm sure they will never do that.
 
With the power of iPhones increasing and the adoption of a Thunderbolt 4 port it should be possible to plug an iPhone into the Studio monitor and use it as a Mac. The ultimate portable Mac, but I'm not holding my breath as I'm sure they will never do that.
If Mac OS isnt on the iPad, which uses desktop chips, it’s not going to be on the phone. Besides, what good is all that power when it’s a tiny sealed enclosure that would overheat and throttle when you try to use it as a Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noraa and dysamoria
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.