Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's Slim, Pro, Ultra, Plus and Max... .... the iPhone 16 Ultrimproplax! Apple really needs to throw Mega into the mix... when folks tell me there's been a bozo infiltration into Apple over the last 10 years all I need for confirmation is their product SKUs and naming.
 
I think you misconstrue why they want this- it’s a great feature and it should exist across the entire product line. Not just special boy Pro phones. But Apple is seemingly out of ideas so they artificially gate this sort of stuff like people are rubes. I guess many are. The Android camp copied so much of what made early iPhones captivating, turn about is fair play. iOS 18 (poorly) borrowed the Home Screen arranging of icons by giving flexibility while sadly still using a grid. Why not take some of the camera and screen features too? Seems like they’ve been fresh out of ideas since the 11/12 era
It is a great feature and should be accross the range. But it isn’t. If u want the feature buy a pro, or android, or go without, or wait until it is accross the range. No big deal.
 
Listen up there buddy. a) clearly some give a hoot given the reactions on my post and the post just after yours, b) you think criticism is out of place on a forum discussing Apple products? Think again, bud.
Hey if you too poor to afford the pro model with the screen you want that’s ok, we cant all have the latest and greatest. Just wait until the tech comes down to the base level non-pro phones.
 
The more I think about this phone, if it ends up with rounded sides instead of flat sides like current phones I will absolutely buy it.

Rounded sides on a phone are to me my most sought after premium phone feature.
 
They gave up on the mini too soon. They needed to find a way to give it more features and capabilities. I love the size but it lacks capabilities. If they were to find a way to make it current and keep the size they might be on to something
If they’d stop gatekeeping features with “Pro” and just sell iPhone as a premium device they could just do a 5.4”, 6.1”, and 6.7” model
 
Hey if you too poor to afford the pro model with the screen you want that’s ok, we cant all have the latest and greatest. Just wait until the tech comes down to the base level non-pro phones.

That's my point, 120Hz has already come down to budget smartphones for years, just not iPhone. It's not some kind of passive trickle down like you make out it to be, it's Apple purposely keeping this a Pro only feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danskin
This “many of us” is like 5 or 6 people that are constantly whining about big phones on Macrumors….. in reality nobody wants tiny phones any more. They didn’t sell and Apple stopped making them…. In fact they went even bigger, so what does that tell you?
Apple hamstrung the model from the features to the marketing and pretend to be shocked when it doesn't have high sales. Everyone I know that's tried the mini has loved the size. The 13 mini is great and I've really enjoyed it.

They didn't sell because most of us that want a small phone want a premium iPhone, not a "base" configuration. I'd have gladly paid a $100 premium for a "Pro" mini. They could have added a few mm thickness to it to give it all day battery life and room for a "Pro" camera model.

5.4" isn't tiny, and with slim bezels it could easily be brought to 5.6" and be smaller than iPhone 7.

You don't have to defend their "climb the ladder" practice, Tim Apple isn't reading this. They can simply make iPhone a premium product in 3 sizes with all the features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danskin
Apple hamstrung the model from the features to the marketing and pretend to be shocked when it doesn't have high sales. Everyone I know that's tried the mini has loved the size. The 13 mini is great and I've really enjoyed it.

They didn't sell because most of us that want a small phone want a premium iPhone, not a "base" configuration. I'd have gladly paid a $100 premium for a "Pro" mini. They could have added a few mm thickness to it to give it all day battery life and room for a "Pro" camera model.

5.4" isn't tiny, and with slim bezels it could easily be brought to 5.6" and be smaller than iPhone 7.

You don't have to defend their "climb the ladder" practice, Tim Apple isn't reading this. They can simply make iPhone a premium product in 3 sizes with all the features.
The only flaw in your argument is that the iPhone 15 and 15 plus variants are the best sellers. most people don't mind buying the under spec'd phones if they can save some money. I have a feeling that Apple can spec up the mini and sales results may get a small boost but not enough to make it a viable product. I get that you prefer that size, but I think it's time to admit that you are in the very small minority.
 
What world are we living in where 0.32 inches is considered fat and 6.5 ounces is considered heavy... jeeeez
For a device that must be manipulated with fingertips, small differences in size and weight can make a difference. Lower weight makes the phone easier to hold and harder to drop. It makes it easier to pull out of your pocket and flip around to use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ab2c4
If they’d stop gatekeeping features with “Pro” and just sell iPhone as a premium device they could just do a 5.4”, 6.1”, and 6.7” model
I don’t see that happening. They could just have one pro max version for those that want it. There is a market for people that want the highest end device. I won’t fault them for catering to them. I do like your idea.
 

Attachments

  • Bender_Rodriguez.png
    Bender_Rodriguez.png
    400.6 KB · Views: 38
Apple made such a big stink about the ability to record 3D 'stereo' video that would be useful with the Apple Vision. Doesn't look like this new camera config will support that in landscape? Sounds un-Apple of them.
 
Based on absolutely nothing other than ‘make it look thinner’ I wonder if this iPhone air will have an iPhone 6 rounded profile again?
 
Based on absolutely nothing other than ‘make it look thinner’ I wonder if this iPhone air will have an iPhone 6 rounded profile again?
I think it might be like the old school ipod touches . They tapered off like a macbook air. That would be really neat. Still holding out for a foldable iphone, or a 8210 sized iphone. Or something size of the iphone when app switcher renders the smaller iphone view. I cant believe there isnt an appetite for a smaller device. I do all my computer stuff on a laptop i only need a decice for camera messages ringo parking etc. apple watch is still too gimped. How about Apple pocket watch. About 55x55 (half iphone pro size) that basically does everything an iphone can do but screen is half size. Put it on a chain and have a neat flip case. So mich they could do but no we get a sh**y extra camera button. This is weird it goes against the apple way. Im actually surprised thatvwe arent at zero buttons yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iZac
Thinner is better? Well in some cases. Just hope we do not have BendGate with the iPhone 17 Slim phones. Hope they don't skimp on the battery power capacity though.
What you refer to as BendGate was actually Apples first attempt to make a flip phone. This will be their second attempt. :)
 
Apple always makes total dollar amount equal value/$ of the iPhone’s hardware.

-Absolutely no way a >$799 iPhone Air’s camera won’t be on par with or better than the standard $799 iPhone.

This Air will certainly be no less than an iPhone 17 Plus but with the addition of ProMotion and a much slimmer and lighter design than the scaled up versions of the $799 mid tier iPhones we have gotten so far.

The Plus only offers a bigger display and slightly bigger battery.

Transforming the Plus into an semi-Pro Air and selling it at $899-$999 makes a lot of sense for those that want more from iPhone Plus but don’t need all the features and weight of the Pro or Pro Max.

I believe this rumor.
 
Hmm. Sounds like Apple is trying to differentiate the Pro and non-Pro lines some more. With Pros being aimed at creatives and this Air lineup for the people who don’t care about the cameras except to have a basic point and shoot.

Personally I’m loving the versatility of the Pro camera setup. A full frame mirrorless is too big and ridiculous to carry around and this one device phone is a good compromise.
 
What many of us want is a smaller (not thinner) iPhone with all of the newest features.
A very vocal minority understandably wants a <6.1” iPhone.

But the majority of people who have bought new iPhones in the last couple of years have gone for 6.1” and > iPhones.

Apple’s first priority is maximizing profits.

Suggesting that Apple quit making <6.1” for any other reason than suboptimal sales figures is ridiculous.

I’m not in favor of it, personally. But <6.1” iPhones are not coming back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.