Last time this kind of rampant SKU differentiation happened Steve had to return and slash the range to refocus on value. Hopefully there's someone waiting in the wings who understands Apple's core values to take over when Tim finally decides he has enough money - I assume he's not in it for the love of the tech.
This sounds like some Gurman nonsense. Apple is so big into cameras; there’s no way their flagship is going to have less cameras. Four cameras maybe, but 2 is ridiculous.
I will pay anything to eliminate the damned Dynamic Island. It’s a joke of an appearance which I can’t stand. Waiting patiently for any upgrade that eliminates ridiculous decisions taking away from the viewable area. A hole punch camera is the most I want to deal with. The island is basically no better than the notch.The pricing feels like canary trap info to find the leaker. It makes no sense to position a non-Pro chip, 8GB RAM, dual rear cameras, aluminum, and a smaller display as something more expensive than Pro Max.
Even if Slim has an under display camera and Face ID, nobody is paying $1,299 for that.
Call me crazy, but I like a product to be more than rumours and guesses before I decide I'm buying it.Slim 17 will be my next upgrade.
I think that is a typo. It meant to say "dual deer camera system". You know, great for the nature photographer.I‘d like to see that „dual dear“ camera system. Will be called iPhone Air btw.
iPhone X had a brand new design and sure the display size was big on spec sheets but the physical size of the phone was smaller than the 8+. I wouldn't be surprised if the 18 series introduced a bigger sized of the rumored "new" design, like the Xs max was just a bigger iPhone XSo less display=more in price?
iPhone 8 Plus - $799So less display=more in price?
But in what world did the 8 Plus have a smaller display than the X...iPhone 8 Plus - $799
iPhone X - $999