HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
OK so trying to match up these rumours I've come up with a suggestion. So far we've got:
What if it's something like this with a raised aluminium top half which runs the width of the device. The triangular camera arrangement however is maintained except they are now flush with the device, and it also stops it wobbling on a table. The lower part of the device remains glass (needed for MagSafe and antenna). Weight distribution of the thicker top half is maintained by using aluminium on the raised half and glass on the thinner, lower part of the device. Could this be it?
- Full width camera bar
- Split materials (aluminium/glass) on the rear
- Maintains triangular camera design
View attachment 2463654
You're asking apple to spend 18¢ more per unit for added aluminum when "thinner" is about subtraction (of cost-per-unit) to Apple.
Why not just original MBair "wedge" shape it with thickened end of wedge housing flush cameras and thinner end of the wedge the one spun for "thinner" messaging purposes?
Someone else suggested a similar idea with both ends getting thicker to address the "wobble" problem but "thinner" in the middle. Instead of the P shape your profile shows, it would be like an I shape minus the left bits of the horitontal bars beyond the vertical line. That concept doesn't wobble either, flushes the camera and lets marketing spin "thinner" (by emphasizing the middle"... much like how MBs and iMacs had the thin edges but then thickened in the middle some years ago, and marketing focused on the thin edges vs. the fatter middle). However, that concept might add 31¢ to each unit, so absolutely NOT.
My guess at modern Apple thinking: JETTISON the camera to an add-on case so they can spin a much thinner iPhone "at same great price" and rake in much more money when people pay more to add the camera back to the phone via that Apple case "you need anyway." This would simply be another variation of jettisoning the 3.5mm jack and selling the dongle, jettisoning the free wired buds and selling "the future" for $16X or more, jettisoning the SIM card but having e-SIM only available at the pricier carriers who support iPhone marketing, etc.
Maybe make this camera case with a proprietary connector so that third parties can't easily make compatible camera cases priced lower without paying Apple a fat licensing fee? Maybe have base, pro and max camera cases to really jack the "essential" add-on revenue. Yes, I'm somewhat joking, but of the 4 concepts, which seems more like modern Apple Inc? 💰💰💰
Bonus: while they are at it, jettison the battery to the case too to absolutely make the case add-on essential while significantly thinning the iPhone at "same great price." Now everyone HAS to pay way up for the case add-on and base, pro & max (cases) can spin various levels of battery life options too. "We think you'll love it!" 💰💰💰
Last edited: