Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 3G Unboxing Photos [Updated]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
... Shaking head in disbelief.....
I think that for videos, a white front might not give enough contrast, making it hard to watch. I don't know, just sharing thoughts from other MR posters.
alright, i haven't read about anyone else noticing this, but there's no way i can be the first...
THOSE BLACK BANDS ON THE SIDES OF THE SCREEN!!!! between the metal "frame" and the actual screen of the iphone, there are these two thin black bands. now i'm pretty sure the screen itself isn't smaller than that of iPhone 1.0, so does that mean that iPhone 2.0 is wider??
THOSE BLACK BANDS ON THE SIDES OF THE SCREEN!!!! between the metal "frame" and the actual screen of the iphone, there are these two thin black bands. now i'm pretty sure the screen itself isn't smaller than that of iPhone 1.0, so does that mean that iPhone 2.0 is wider??
The fingerprints aren't a big deal because you can always get an InvisiShield. But still, why wouldn't they give the plastic a fine texture?
Which is why I had my 9 year old cousin make me one out of Lego bricks yesterday. It turned out nice too.
Here's the white iPhone I want:
+1
I'd take one in a heartbeat.
And btw hail to the white iPhone. I'd prefer white over black any time, as I'm still loving all my white Apple products.
I also love my white Samsung LCD-TV. Looks so much better!
Nice And Smudgy!
I wonder why they veered away from the aluminum back casing, bad call IMHO, however was probably based on cost?
Either way the plastic backs make it look cheap and those fingerprints! Looks like it will be a whitey for me if I "upgrade" from my gen1 iPhone.
As long as those 2 little screws on the bottom of the iphone near the speaker/mic allow one to remove the backing, I am sure 3rd parties will make replacement backings in all colors of the rainbow.... PLEASE OFFER ONE IN ALUMINUM!
I wonder why they veered away from the aluminum back casing, bad call IMHO, however was probably based on cost?
Either way the plastic backs make it look cheap and those fingerprints! Looks like it will be a whitey for me if I "upgrade" from my gen1 iPhone.
As long as those 2 little screws on the bottom of the iphone near the speaker/mic allow one to remove the backing, I am sure 3rd parties will make replacement backings in all colors of the rainbow.... PLEASE OFFER ONE IN ALUMINUM!
32gig iPhone???
Does anyone think that there might be a 32gig iPhone in the works and out by the end of the year??
-Paul
Does anyone think that there might be a 32gig iPhone in the works and out by the end of the year??
-Paul
Yikes
I just want to know if it's gonna be worth the extra coin.
I mean, is this going to be a waste of money?
I'm really luke warm about it.
They might have made a bigger one or something to make it interesting.
pretty boring IMHO
Now if there's tons of neat apps...........
I just want to know if it's gonna be worth the extra coin.
I mean, is this going to be a waste of money?
I'm really luke warm about it.
They might have made a bigger one or something to make it interesting.
pretty boring IMHO
Now if there's tons of neat apps...........
Tínhamos que ser os primeiros... [We just had to be the first... It's no wonder, we have a cellphone-per-capita ratio bigger than one! ]
That is, indeed, the correct form. I think I should just point out why : in some romance languages, namely portuguese and spanish, there are actually *two* different "to be" verbs, one for intrinsic qualities and auxiliary use, "ser" (literally, in the "to be or not to be" sense, as in "she's tall"), and another for for the current state of affairs of anything at the present moment or at a given period in time (thus trasmitting a sense of duration), "estar" (as in "How are you" or "the glass is half full").
This makes english-to-portuguese automatic translation virtually impossible, whether free or not. Also, english speakers, be they native or not, usually find this utterly confusing and portuguese speakers, on the other hand, may find english difficult to comprehend at times, as the verb "to be", in english, can only be understood in context. In fact, some ambiguities remain in english which have no counterpart in portuguese as we can say, for example, "she's cute [today]", without having to add the "today" part, whereas an english speaker cannot.
Ahahaha, esperemos que não seja, senão está lixado com a ASAE [Let's hope he's not, otherwise he'd be in trouble with our very own FDA-like hounds, much mocked by everyone here because they keep shutting down popular but (allegedly) improperly sanitized restaurants — most people just think they're being too anal and that they're also endangering many traditional products and places, but in some cases, it's good they're setting some standards already]
Hmmm, no luck for you... They're just basking at the coverage they're getting and making bets on whether their server will hold up...
[We just had to be the first... It's no wonder, we have a cellphone-per-capita ratio bigger than one! ]Now Steve Jobs will have to learn how to fire people also in portuguese.
São despedidos!
("You are fired!" in Portuguese - courtesy of FreeTranslation.com)
Thank God it's free cause it's just plain wrong.
"Você está despedido!" is the correct way.
That is, indeed, the correct form. I think I should just point out why
: in some romance languages, namely portuguese and spanish, there are actually *two* different "to be" verbs, one for intrinsic qualities and auxiliary use, "ser" (literally, in the "to be or not to be" sense, as in "she's tall"), and another for for the current state of affairs of anything at the present moment or at a given period in time (thus trasmitting a sense of duration), "estar" (as in "How are you" or "the glass is half full").This makes english-to-portuguese automatic translation virtually impossible, whether free or not. Also, english speakers, be they native or not, usually find this utterly confusing and portuguese speakers, on the other hand, may find english difficult to comprehend at times, as the verb "to be", in english, can only be understood in context. In fact, some ambiguities remain in english which have no counterpart in portuguese as we can say, for example, "she's cute [today]", without having to add the "today" part, whereas an english speaker cannot.
The person should have washed his hands before handling.
I just hope he is not a cook/chef of some kind!
Ahahaha, esperemos que não seja, senão está lixado com a ASAE
[Let's hope he's not, otherwise he'd be in trouble with our very own FDA-like hounds, much mocked by everyone here because they keep shutting down popular but (allegedly) improperly sanitized restaurants — most people just think they're being too anal and that they're also endangering many traditional products and places, but in some cases, it's good they're setting some standards already]Hmmm, no luck for you... They're just basking at the coverage they're getting and making bets on whether their server will hold up...