Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Based on how "fast" a lot of the competing Android phones run even if equipped with high spec CPU hardware, I doubt it. You're confusing the "phone" being slow with the raw speed of the CPU. You'd be hard pressed to find an Android phone that does its general functions faster than even the 4S.
How to put it... That's simply not true.

I have both a 4S and a Galaxy Nexus. Galaxy Nexus seems at least as fast as the 4S, it actually loads websites faster.

Did you just argue that one phone processes things faster than another by comparing page load speeds, when one is LTE and the other is not
 
Your app argument isn't valid any more and you know it. The UI isn't well designed at all. Try turning off 3g wifi or blue tooth without the hassle of the settings menu. Not to mention you have to open an app to get any data out of it. My S3 is made very well out of glass metal and plastic oh and doesn't shatter like iPhone's. Oh and resale value is all relative. The contracts and phone prices are way higher for no other reason than its apple. And everyone knows a apple fanboy and his money are easily parted.

And who cares about upgrades when the upgrade is iOs 6 lol. I'd rather have custom roms

The app argument is completely valid. I am an app developer and Apple is always the main focus when beginning an app. It's much easier to make money through iOS apps then Android. Additionally you are coding to a known family of devices and iOS versions. Android is chaos with all the different device sizes, OS versions, and carrier extensions. There are many great looking, professional Android apps but not to the same extent as iOS.

For the UI, saying it is poorly designed is comical. It's aesthetically pleasing, intuitive, and offers a consistent experience. Android phones are all over the place, forcing the consumer to adjust each time they upgrade.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about with your price argument. Data plans don't vary based on which device you are using. Data is data. For the phone, the price is the same as the high end Android phones. The difference is I can sell my iPhone 4 for 275 bucks, how much will a two year old Android fetch?

Your response on upgrades make no sense. What does iOS 6 have to do with Android phones having terrible support for getting future versions of the OS? You seem to have a problem with facts...
 
Wow, what a surprise, a phone that is about to be released has a slightly better performance than the S3... :rolleyes: Reactions here are amusing.
I would be extremely surprised if the iPhone 5, which hasn't even been released yet, was slower than the competition. :rolleyes:

Yeah, does anyone here realize that the iPhone 5 is newer than the S3? It hasn't even been released yet. If the benchmark was showing a faster Samsung phone that is newer than the 4S, you'd all go apes***.
I just don't get the Apple fans here cheering about the iPhone having a slightly better benchmark test than the S3. The S3 is simply an older phone.
I don't see anything impressive about a new processor being faster than an old one. I will only be impressed if/when the Android phones in the months after this are slower in benchmark, but I doubt that will happen, hence the "impressed".
Guys, you're going to be hugely embarrassed when another Android phone comes out that is faster than the iPhone 5.

you completely miss the point. The Point is that Android fans typically quote specs of the android devices (IE: SG3) like "Quad core" "2 GB Ram" as proof that the phone is better. These numbers, if correct would prove otherwise, and show that arguing the specs of an Android phone as being better would make that person ignorant.

You are incorrectly thinking that people here are just amazed that a newer phone performs slightly better than the SG3, but they are simply cheering on Apple who was able to make a phone with much lower specs, out perform the SG3
 
get real people.. celebrating a win btw a score of 1601 vs 1560? that's so negligible.

Absolutely negligible. Rounding error from a too-small sample size.

But just being in the same ballpark now (using half the cores and cooler clock rate), given that Apple could sell earlier products enormously well against higher spec'd competition, makes this new iPhone look like it will have even more upside.
 
This whole issue is totally redundant anyway.

I have an IPhone 4 and a Sony Ericson Ray, which is a year newer than the iPhone and should in theory have a better CPU.

But the problem with the Android is not the specs, it is a fast phone, but the OS. I have frequent system slow downs and freezes when doing simple tasks like trying to open the phone software to make a call, the battery lasts only a few hours if I use it much. (NTT docomo are still only allowing us to use GingerBread, they haven't let us update yet)

The iPhone has iOS.

It feels like when OSX was up against Vista. In that situation, specs didn't matter because it was all about the OS.

Now we have Windows 7, which is actually a really good OS (for enterprise environments). But for usability, OSX still kills it (I haven't downloaded Windows 8 yet so can't comment about it, sorry.

At some point. Android will improve. But so will iOS and at the moment, iOS has the best user experience.
 
Interesting post from HN:
jfpoole 2 hours ago | link

Geekbench developer here.
Out of curiosity I built Geekbench with Xcode 4.5 (it's not available on the App Store yet) and took a look at the code generated for the armv7 and the armv7s architectures. Surprisingly there weren't a lot of differences between the two. The biggest difference I saw was that Xcode uses conditional VFP instructions (e.g., vaddeq.f64) for the armv7s but doesn't use them for the armv7 despite the fact that these instructions are supported by the armv7.

My guess is that the A6 implementation of these instructions is much faster, but I won't know for sure until I can run benchmarks on the iPhone 5 myself.
Also, I could only find two instructions (sdiv and udiv) that Xcode generates for the armv7s architecture that aren't supported by the armv7 architecture.
 
We aren't talking development here. We are talking taking advantage of fast cpu in the phone. The iphone doesn't multitask unlike the S3 so it's always just running the app your on which generally are pretty low power. Heck you can't even run flash which the S3 does fantastically. Half the time I'm downloading torrents running messaging clients and browsing all at the same time with no freeze state trickery going on


Right why dont you buy your stuff instead of stealing by torrenting it
 
These are pretty close to Macbook Air performances.

Anyone care to take a guess at how long it'll be before Apple releases a Macbook Air with ARM & OS X for ARM?

A battery that size could last for days.
 
The battery life on this will be terrible.

Faster processor + LTE radio but with the same size battery as the 4S? I'll be lucky to get 8hrs of moderate use out of this.
 
Just something to consider:

Those results measure theoretical performance. As if each thread was under full load.

That's not what happens in most real-life task. Multi-threading isn't perfect and for most basic interactions with your phone a single thread has the vast majority of the load.

Those results show that a single core of the A6 is about as fast as 2 cores in the GS3 / N7. What this means is that all single-threaded tasks will be twice as fast.

Multi-core performance is always better on paper than in practice, so it's much better to have fewer cores that deliver the same level of performance.

According to Anandtech, launching an application, starting a song, opening an email attachment and saving are all tasks that mostly use a single thread.

iPhone5-301-1_575px.jpg

threaded.png
 
I wouldn't say they are dead; but this looks to me or any tech enthusiasts ..that apple focuses on details not only on the outside, but also on the internal engineering.

Anyone can dump in 3000 + mAh worth of battery and claim that their phone has the best battery life; but making a thinner phone with better performance and battery life? That's innovation.

It's not innovation, it's an incremental change.

in·no·va·tion   [in-uh-vey-shuhn]
noun
1. something new or different introduced: numerous innovations in the high-school curriculum.
2. the act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods.

Innovation refers to the introduction of things that weren't there before. So the introduction of an anodized aluminum back is innovation. The sapphire glass over the camera is innovation. The new Apple-designed CPU is innovation. The Lightning cable is innovation. Obviously, the larger screen with its touch sensors integrated into the glass is innovation.

The various properties, like the industry-leading thinness, the incredible performance, and the excellent battery life are incremental changes that are made possible by innovation.
 
I hate how people have double standards. First, numbers don't matter, only real world use does. Of course this is only true when your numbers are lower, but when they're higher, they're the most important thing in the world.

Please, let's just enjoy our devices and stop criticizing people that disagree with our opinions. Do it for the children. :p
 
The battery life on this will be terrible.

Faster processor + LTE radio but with the same size battery as the 4S? I'll be lucky to get 8hrs of moderate use out of this.

That's why the speed at 1Ghz is impressive. Obviously Apple designed its own micro architecture to get the best battery vs. speed.

But it's somewhat sad to see the thread devolve into yet another Apple vs. Android thread. GeekBench isn't a good tool compare one platform against another because there are so many factors involved. You can get an idea on the rough raw power available but the user experience doesn't necessarily reflect that.

On the other hand, we know iPhone 4S is a joy to use so iPhone 5 at double the GeekBench score should be a doozy.
 
Apple didn't even bother packing quad-core into that... Can you imagine if it had 2 more cores?
Holy crap.

Spec race fandroids? You need to start appreciating everything as a whole not solely your specs. Reminds me of the time windows laptop makers were stuffing their laptops with lots of ram but apple was still sitting on 1GB/2GB ram and still running smoother.

Specs don't do jack samsung.
 
Its funny how all the people in this thread have yet to acknowledge the posts that have the S3 as higher than the iPhone 5:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • ss.JPG
    ss.JPG
    83.2 KB · Views: 277
iPhone 4s screen 3.5", iPhone 5 4.0"

Does the math escape you, or were you hoping to hold a tablet up to your ear?

you hold the phone to your ear? you know they came out with these new bluetooth headsets for that.

I email, txt, surf for 90% of my IPhone use. I want a bigger screen, Note 2 is high on my list.
 
Its funny how all the people in this thread have yet to acknowledge the posts that have the S3 as higher than the iPhone 5:rolleyes:
Sure, you can overclock the Galaxy S3 to 1800MHz if you don't care about battery life.

As has been noted repeatedly in this thread, the S3's scores at stock speed vary dramatically depending on the OS, the power management settings, and the android services that are running in the background. You can disable power saving features (or run the benchmark while charging) and background processes like notifications, and increase the S3's score by 10-20%, but not many folks are interested in a crippled functionality with half the battery life.

Furthermore, as mentioned earlier, Geekbench has not been recompiled with Apple's Xcode v4.5 compiler to take advantage of some enhanced functions in the A6. We'll have to wait and see, but that could boost the iPhone 5's score by another 10% or more.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.