He's not comparing two blocks of materials, he is comparing two phones.
When you buy a car, do you care about the exact mix of steel used in its engine? No, you care about design, about features, about performance...
When you take a plane, to you care about the particular brand of aluminum used? No, all you care about is that the wings will stay attached to the plane and will not bend...
When you buy a toilet seat, do you care about the precise brand of ceramic used or about what kind of steel was used to reinforce it? Nope. Unless you're an extremely obsessive individual, you just care that it won't crumble under you when you sit on it...
That's the same with a phone. You buy a phone based on its design, performance, application ecosystem, operating system... You don't care about the material. Picking the right material for the normal use of a phone is the burden of the manufacturer, not of the customer.
What the customer might care about is knowing if phone A is more resilient than phone B. How this resilience is achieved, whether it's through choice of material or layering of several materials or structure is really of no concern to the customer...
The problem is that you're looking at the whole problem with fanboy glasses. The issue is not too give a good mark for efforts to your favorite brand, whether it's Apple or Samsung. Only shareholder, employees or insane people care about that. The customer just doesn't give a damn about efforts, he just wants results. The issue is just to determine if a phone is fit for normal use or not.
He's not comparing two blocks of materials, he is comparing two phones.
When you buy a car, do you care about the exact mix of steel used in its engine? No, you care about design, about features, about performance...
When you take a plane, to you care about the particular brand of aluminum used? No, all you care about is that the wings will stay attached to the plane and will not bend...
When you buy a toilet seat, do you care about the precise brand of ceramic used or about what kind of steel was used to reinforce it? Nope. Unless you're an extremely obsessive individual, you just care that it won't crumble under you when you sit on it...
That's the same with a phone. You buy a phone based on its design, performance, application ecosystem, operating system... You don't care about the material. Picking the right material for the normal use of a phone is the burden of the manufacturer, not of the customer.
What the customer might care about is knowing if phone A is more resilient than phone B. How this resilience is achieved, whether it's through choice of material or layering of several materials or structure is really of no concern to the customer...
The problem is that you're looking at the whole problem with fanboy glasses. The issue is not too give a good mark for efforts to your favorite brand, whether it's Apple or Samsung. Only shareholder, employees or insane people care about that. The customer just doesn't give a damn about efforts, he just wants results. The issue is just to determine if a phone is fit for normal use or not.
Its finally all the recent people joining the forum just to say useless crap. Wonder how that note 4 release is going today. They sell out? Probably not.
What release?
Nobody cares about Samsung
----------
Trying to get hits on your ***** channel??
Did you watch the video, troll?
"I have been so careful with my S4, never dropped it. Looking after it. Today I put my phone in my front jeans pocket like always. Got in the car and after a 5 minute drive got out and the screen is showing funny colors and its cracked ;( "
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2287882
That forum is exactly like this one its hilarious. All you haters need to leave and stop the "apple made a poor design". People just break their stuff, simple as that. Jeez, I can't believe this was such big news, there's been no proof that Apple's design is flawed or that it'll bend in your pocket, Just a couple photos and videos of people intentionally breaking the phone. At least the iPhone keeps working after you bend it, all the other ones crack and break or they.
Im wondering how may display models Apple stores are going to have to go through from people going into the store and trying to flex the 6 plus, lol
is it coincidental that the Note 4 release was pushed to today and all this news comes out this week.
And how many of these bent iphones may have possible been bent out of the box as an issue with manufacturing and not actually bent in peoples pockets, they just never thought to look at it until all this fuss was made.
How about instead of posting a video you take the phone to Apple, let them know, and perhaps, maybe just perhaps, they will replace the device for you.
(Its actually difficult to be rational in the response to this issue and not sound like a troll)
Anyway, what a load of cobblers those tests are lol.
"here is a video of us doing something to an iphone"
Seriously, Apple take you lot for a load of chumps.
I bet any engineer looking at that video is laughing at it.
How could 9 people cause all this genuine question.
It's called the MacRumors Reality Distortion Field.
Understand this skanska...Someone ranted that is was only 2 that complained just yesterday, and now its 9. Give it more time, and more customers receiving the iPhone 6+ will weigh in or will complain directly to Apple since they may not know of this forum. Remember it just came out.
As far as the other ranter saying that no iPhone can bend while inside the front pockets. Where does it say it cannot ? Who gave him this authority of knowing this ? Tight front pockets, bending over, getting in and out of a car, chair and yes one MIGHT bend it over time. Not to mention bumping into something. Goodness, why can't some people understand, some have issues and they have every right to voice their anger and disappointment on this forum. You nut cases that rant about them don't you ? They have the same right.
It's still funny that so many people think this is such a huge issue when in reality its the same damn pictures of the same phones over and over that are shown bent or its some guy claiming he is barely putting anything into it and it bends like he is controlling it with his mind, yet his hands are shaking while doing it.
Everyone thinks they are a reporter with social media today.
----------
wow look, you just joined this forum, no wonder you have nothing positive to say.
I bet any engineer looking at that video is laughing at it.
Also an engineer here. In my opinion, it's very likely that the engineers knew exactly where the weak points were prior to release, exactly why they are weak, and exactly how to improve the design.Nope. Materials engineer here. Those are very standard industry tests and if passed can give a reasonable indication that the average phone will be fairly durable. Obviously, there is no substitute for real world use, but viewing those tests makes me confident that they did a wide battery of testing on the phones before release and anticipated that this design might be more prone to bending. If a phone bent or deformed in those tests, they would have sent the design back for more reinforcement.
Nope. Materials engineer here. Those are very standard industry tests and if passed can give a reasonable indication that the average phone will be fairly durable. Obviously, there is no substitute for real world use, but viewing those tests makes me confident that they did a wide battery of testing on the phones before release and anticipated that this design might be more prone to bending. If a phone bent or deformed in those tests, they would have sent the design back for more reinforcement.
Also an engineer here. In my opinion, it's very likely that the engineers knew exactly where the weak points were prior to release, exactly why they are weak, and exactly how to improve the design.
Also, it's very likely that the engineers are not 100% happy with what had to be released (are they ever?? LOL). Due to schedule limitations (most likely), budget limitations, target cost limitations, promises/requirements to/from shareholders, marketing, management, etc with regards to design, thinness, cost, etc, they likely had to move forward with the best iteration that they had by the hard deadline.
This is not to say that they are not happy at all with what they produced. I'm sure they are -- it's beautiful in design and thinness, and I'm getting the impression that though the design appears to be weaker than other phones, it's overall weakness is being overblown.
Anyway, I would be willing to bet that they knew the phone is weaker than previous designs, wished they could improve it further, but due to limitations mentioned above, made the concsious and calculated decision that they believed it would stand up to real world usage to the point that it would not cause a major problem.
I'm not trying to say whether they were right or wrong in their assessment. I still believe we do not have enough information or data points to know for sure. It's clear that Apple tests the phones thoroughly (did anyone really think they didn't?), but the tests are only meant to replicate a repeatable version of "normal usage" and we were not provided with the data which led them to the test sets for what they call "normal".
The nature of the caused damaged being, allegedly, "real world usage", and therefore, being different for each individual, with some level of randomness in how often any given individual experiences a peak in the forces applied to the phone during their own normal usage, I feel that some users may happen to experience a slight bend very soon into ownership, while others might experience it after several weeks or months, if at all. It's a matter of waiting for the moment when the individual might experience a peak in the force applied that they still consider to be "normal", and whether or not that peak causes any damage (bending) to the phone. Time will tell if more bent phones surface as more people subject their phones to their own peak forces experienced by living their daily lives.
Not that any of you care, but if you want my opinion, I think we'll see more bent phones surface, probably more total bent phones than any other single phone model to date from any manufacturer, but the total number will still not be cause for alarm or any stir beyond the initial overblown assessment and comments/articles we've seen so far. Apple will quietly replace bent phones for users who have them, and this will go down in history as not as bad as antenna gate. People will learn to be even more careful with their phone than they thought they had to be, and the 6S+ will improve the rigidity.
So how many cases of these phone's bending have actually been reported in total?
Wasn't the figure only 9 as of yesterday?
----------
Buy what you like, its a free market, the choice is there and we are not forced.