Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Better get ready for the returns, Apple! People will keep exchanging until they get the better chip like the 32nm A5 iPad 2.

Oh my. Cue the people who will exchange one dozen times and still not be happy with their replacement. I feel bad for the employees that have to deal with this insanity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHorrorNerd
Did anybody else notice on iFixit teardowns that the APL0898 is in the 6s and the APL1022 is in the 6s Plus? The smaller chip in the smaller phone, bigger chip in the bigger of the two..
 
Oh my. Cue the people who will exchange one dozen times and still not be happy with their replacement. I feel bad for the employees that have to deal with this insanity.
When extensive research has been made on both versions of the chips and if the results say that the smaller version is even slightly better at performance and/or efficiency, then I wouldn't blame the customers for wanting to exchange. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't feel bad for the employees as well.
 
When extensive research has been made on both versions of the chips and if the results say that the smaller version is even slightly better at performance and/or efficiency, then I wouldn't blame the customers for wanting to exchange. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't feel bad for the employees as well.

But the difference is likely so small, you would never ever notice.
 
WOW. Turns out my wife and I have same phone, one runs hot and has been more laggy. I bet this is the reason. How do I find out which chip we have? Will definitely return one. Why Apple would do this is beyond me.

Or maybe more likely you got a different config, different apps running in backgroup, etc.
If anything, Apple would have clocked down the TSMC one (so it would be slightly slower by a few percent), so the temp would be pretty similar on both.

I also think TSMC's process is not exactly the same as Samsung (so, size is not the only difference). It's not as straight forward an assessment as it may seem just looking at the sizes.

You do you Apple has pretty decent engineers who know what they're doing hey.

Seriously, there's going to be whining about this, like everything else. Depressing really.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: btrach144
Are says it is possible that the larger chip is in the 6S+ but they have no sure fire way of saying it is always the case.
 
whats funny is that the people who actually cares about this, are the ones who just texts and make phone calls here an there, with maybe some occasional web browsing/youtubing/and candy crush gaming, yet they will act like they need incremental performance enhancements for their oh soo performance throbbing tasks..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transeau
No it's not amazing it's pathetic. Like I said people need to just enjoy their deviceses and quit looking for problems!

Tell me about it. God forbid people spending $700+ on a device demand that they're receiving the same performing device as everyone else.

If you're going to use different suppliers (which is almost mandatory), make sure both parts are identical (not physically, but performance wise). If one outperforms the other, it's unacceptable and I dare say unethical in my opinion.

I guess we'll soon find out if this is a real issue when they start testing the two against each other.
 
Screen quality, yes that did concern me in the past, but I can't imagine these chip sizes (other than perhaps a very minor battery-life edge for Samsung's 14nm chip) would produce a noticeable speed difference amongst iPhones with distinct silicon. My wild guess would be the 'larger' chip to end up in the 6s Plus, because of the extra room, but at this point that's all it is, conjecture.
 
To avoid confusion They shouldve just put one in the 6S and the other in the plus. i guess the 14 would go in the 6S to help the battery life there. Assuming it does

The only evidence thusfar is just that, one speculation is that the 6s+ has more room for heat dissipation, so it would go there. I hope that's the case (that one fab'd chip goes in only one of the 2 models) just because I don't want to hear about this for the next 12 months :)
 
Did anybody else notice on iFixit teardowns that the APL0898 is in the 6s and the APL1022 is in the 6s Plus? The smaller chip in the smaller phone, bigger chip in the bigger of the two..

Correct! A few Chinese sites have noticed this as well. the APL0898 is the 14nm process according to its datasheet.
 
whats funny is that the people who actually cares about this, are the ones who just texts and make phone calls here an there, with maybe some occasional web browsing/youtubing/and candy crush gaming, yet they will act like they need incremental performance enhancements for their oh soo performance throbbing tasks..

This is exactly the problem here! I have a nephew that constantly brags that his phone's "XLTE" is so much faster than mine. And he's right, speedtest.net shows that I average about 30x30 and he averages about 90x50. He has let to show me a use for that.

This "ChipGate" is stupid. The only case I can see here is if one gets a noticeable increase in battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deelron
Is this why i've been experiencing stuttering and freezing occasionally?

6 and 6S running iOS 9.0.1. Same user content. 6S will occasionally freeze for 3-5 seconds, or stutter.

6 runs without issue.

Probably not but can't help but ask

And to all the uppity naysayers, its a simple question. Get off your high horse.

I get the same issues with my 6s and not with my 6 ..

when I unlock the 6s the screen freezes for 3/5 seconds before I can select apps...

also running a game for 10 min my iphone heats up so bad I have to stop playing as it starts to burn my hand .. I may need to visit an apple store for this as my iphone 6 does not have these issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: daneoni
Tell me about it. God forbid people spending $700+ on a device demand that they're receiving the same performing device as everyone else.

If you're going to use different suppliers (which is almost mandatory), make sure both parts are identical (not physically, but performance wise). If one outperforms the other, it's unacceptable and I dare say unethical in my opinion.

I guess we'll soon find out if this is a real issue when they start testing the two against each other.

Please just return your 6s and switch to a different phone please
 
Tell me about it. God forbid people spending $700+ on a device demand that they're receiving the same performing device as everyone else.

If you're going to use different suppliers (which is almost mandatory), make sure both parts are identical (not physically, but performance wise). If one outperforms the other, it's unacceptable and I dare say unethical in my opinion.

I guess we'll soon find out if this is a real issue when they start testing the two against each other.

How on earth do you even know one performs less than the other. THEY DIDN'T EVEN SAY ANYTHING THAT. They're specialists and even them aren't sure about it. They want to test them!

Is this a preemptive rant session? Seems like it...

Considering chips must run in the same phone, it's probable that thermal constraints have led to both chips being tuned to perform pretty much the same (within a margin of error). You know engineers can do that don't you?

I wouldn't be surprised if this tuning is the reason why clock rate tested in Geekbench have varied so much.

There are small variance even of processors on the same process from the same fab.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.