Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 6s Uses Different-Sized A9 Chips From Samsung and TSMC
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It was rumored yesterday that AMD will be using TSMCs 16nm fabs instead of Global Foundry's 14nm fabs for their next gen CPUs next year. GFs 14nm should have the same specs as Samsungs 14nm*, so that would suggest that TSMCs 16nm process is quite mature and a suitable alternative to 14nm.
*(Samsung and Global Foundries developed their 14nm technology together, but samsung got their fabs operational much more quickly than GF has been able to).
*(Samsung and Global Foundries developed their 14nm technology together, but samsung got their fabs operational much more quickly than GF has been able to).
at the quantities that apple is ordering, it was very smart that they split the order because of how new the 14/16nm node is. Samsung is probably very reliable producing 14nm at high quantity because theyve been doing it for abotu a year already with the s6. So they probably charged apple more.
I'm not even sure that matters. As long as the lower battery life of the two, should it somehow exist, meets what's advertised.
Last edited:
That would make sense. The 6S+ has a larger battery so can handle the greater power consumption of the bigger one.
The rumor is that TSMC is providing 30% of the chips, which sounds about right for the 6s/6s+ distinction.
No doubt the supply pipeline, and the possible disruptions to that inherent with single-source providers were foremost on Apple's mind; hopefully their testing revealed the performance differences between the chips to be negligible.
We've got enough to worry about already.
We've got enough to worry about already.
All I know is my geek bench score pretty much doubled. And that's all I've got to say about that.
We have the right to complaint because the phones are not free.
I remember back when Apple used both Toshiba and Samsung to source SSDs for the MacBook Air. The Samsung SSDs were somewhat faster on certain benchmarks, and people would do elaborate tests to figure out which version they had. In this case, I doubt there will be any noticeable difference. It's not like one is on a 28nm process and the other is on a 14nm process. It's probably a yield issue. Samsung uses 14nm for its own products, and hasn't yet scaled up to make enough chips for both itself and Apple. TSMC has a similar process that yields processors only slightly larger, and so Apple sent the "overflow" to them.
No, you only have the right to complain if the phone does not meet the specs quoted.
Not sure if serious.
If you do have a laggy phone, have Apple look at it. Maybe you got a defect or a bad software installation. I doubt TSMC vs. Samsung is going to make any noticeable difference.
Multiple sources, especially for critical components, is always a good thing.
Also, two words: "bidding wars."
Who cares what the logo looks like? Spend the money on the tech, not stupid designers making logos.
haha. Next headline: Apple genuine leather cases not made form cloned cows
Perhaps. My guess is that Apple gets a pretty good volume discount when they order 90 million A9 chips to meet the launch demand.
Buy Intel. Fire everybody. Shut down all manufacturing operations in the US. Ship all the cutting edge manufacturing know-how to TSMC/China to mass-produce Apple A-processors 365 days a year. Move all Apple products to ARM. Watch the entire PC industry + Microsoft, reliant on Intel chips file for bankruptcy. In one stroke Apple owns the personal computing, server and mobile markets.
Congratulations, you've just discovered the joke, even though you didn't get it was the joke.
You're like the Christopher Columbus of humor.